| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
lavar703
Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Posts: 4832
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:59 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| footy_29 wrote: | | lavar703 wrote: | | I'm perfectly fine sticking with the receiver corp we have now for one more season to see if they develop. |
As long as that does not include Banks, I agree. The only one I would potentially bounce is Briscoe but they might as well give him another year and look to spend their cash and picks elsewhere. |
I considered him leaving a forgone conclusion Footy...
_________________
| Deets wrote: | | Absolutely nothing. In two years, Ryan Tannehill will be far better than RGIII. |
RIP Sean Taylor "Forever a Redskin" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lavar703
Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Posts: 4832
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mike23md wrote: | | lavar703 wrote: | | mike23md wrote: | | Well, I forgot to read the write up about Davis on the East West Shrine bowl and he didnt have as good of outing as I thought he might of had. So he could be a late 6th or 7th if he doesnt do well at the combine. |
Davis has amazing measurables but he loses focuse big time. He just doesn't seem interested in the game but that could be the horrible play-calling of Stynespring? I wouldn't mind going after Marcus late but he's just too inconsistent to select before the fifth and he's most likely going to go much higher due to his amazing speed. |
Its actually due to the inaccuracy of Logan Thomas. He has been really inconsistent this past year and returned to school to try and improve his stock for next year. |
Logan Thomas' inaccuracy didn't change the fact that Davis lost focus and had quite a few drops. I'm a Tech fan, I watch all the games, he drops the ball. His measurables are completely off the charts but he just doesn't seem to care some times.
_________________
| Deets wrote: | | Absolutely nothing. In two years, Ryan Tannehill will be far better than RGIII. |
RIP Sean Taylor "Forever a Redskin" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mike23md
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 6494
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Well, we certainly don't need another Hankerson around here.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
