Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

My mock offseason. Discuss.
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Tampa Bay Buccaneers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
RoeKG


Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 4233
Location: PA
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think we need both pass rushers and corners, with an edge to CB, IMO. The game against the Eagles convinced me that the coverage is the problem over the pass rush because we had a few sacks, but still couldn't stop them.

Personally I don't think it's a point like last year with the Claiborne vs. Richardson debate. The pass rush is broken and either approach will help it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
REDandPEWTER


Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 8156
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RoeKG wrote:
I think we need both pass rushers and corners, with an edge to CB, IMO. The game against the Eagles convinced me that the coverage is the problem over the pass rush because we had a few sacks, but still couldn't stop them.

Personally I don't think it's a point like last year with the Claiborne vs. Richardson debate. The pass rush is broken and either approach will help it.


Honestly I think one gets approached in FA and other. In draft.

I think if Bennett is resigned at a reasonable price we go after a cb and safety in FA. Then dlineman in rd 1 and address cb in rd 2 or 3.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DaRealdeal


Moderator
Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Posts: 9114
Location: Jamison. on the sig
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RoeKG wrote:
I think we need both pass rushers and corners, with an edge to CB, IMO. The game against the Eagles convinced me that the coverage is the problem over the pass rush because we had a few sacks, but still couldn't stop them.

Personally I don't think it's a point like last year with the Claiborne vs. Richardson debate. The pass rush is broken and either approach will help it.

Well said and I completely agree.

Pass-rush and pass coverage have a symbiotic relationship. A soft secondary can be protected by a dominant pass rush and a dominant secondary can give a less than talented pass rush more time to get to the QB. We just happen to need help in both areas.
_________________


Adopt-A-Buc Adrian Clayborn
Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Tampa Bay Buccaneers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group