| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
schuttje
Joined: 24 Jan 2008
Posts: 2232
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:14 am Post subject: Philip Rivers |
 |
|
|
| Would you trade our 1st and future 2nd for Phillip Rivers and SD's first? SD over values Matt Barkley and trades up to secure they get the USC QB who can bring fans into the stands and prepare the team for a move to LA if they don't show up. If my trade is weak, what would it cost? I would trade our future 1st if it was required. I would trade Weeden for a 3rd or 4th or maybe a player like Kyle Wilson. Draft Chance Warmack with SD's 1st and sign defensive free agents and the big name WR if he would come. What would you do to get Rivers and how would your offseason look? Or do you hate the idea? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
elfman55
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 1058
Location: Ashtabula,Ohio
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
No!!
elfman |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
schuttje
Joined: 24 Jan 2008
Posts: 2232
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| elfman55 wrote: | No!!
elfman |
Do you dislike Rivers or the trade? Is it unreasonable? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TRAIL'S END#307
Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Posts: 92
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| If it is true that" SD over values Matt Barkley and trades up to secure they get the USC QB…" Then we get their 1st, 2nd & 3rd this year & their 2nd & 4th next year & we draft BPA. I'd be ok ** BUT I DON'T WANT PHILLIP RIVERS! Go Browns! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
schuttje
Joined: 24 Jan 2008
Posts: 2232
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Somebody please explain to me why Philip Rivers sucks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dropkick_pride
Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Posts: 10805
Location: C-bus
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| schuttje wrote: | | Somebody please explain to me why Philip Rivers sucks. |
talent drain around him.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
schuttje
Joined: 24 Jan 2008
Posts: 2232
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dropkick_pride wrote: | | schuttje wrote: | | Somebody please explain to me why Philip Rivers sucks. |
talent drain around him. |
So reuniting with Norv and Chud would be a bad idea? Good oline, Gordon, Little, Benjamin, Cameron, and Richardson. I think that has potential of the VJackson, Floyd, Gates, and LT days. Not comparing the players, just overall offense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DawgX
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
Posts: 12354
Location: Cleveland, OH
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'm not sure what I'd give up for him. If the Browns are going to trade for a quarterback, I'd prefer to go after a younger one.
It's funny that people think Rivers is garbage. He had one down year and now people act like he's one of the worst QBs in the league. Most years of his career he's been one of the best QBs in the league.
_________________
Cleveland Browns Forum Hall of Fame Inductee |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dropkick_pride
Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Posts: 10805
Location: C-bus
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| schuttje wrote: | | Dropkick_pride wrote: | | schuttje wrote: | | Somebody please explain to me why Philip Rivers sucks. |
talent drain around him. |
So reuniting with Norv and Chud would be a bad idea? Good oline, Gordon, Little, Benjamin, Cameron, and Richardson. I think that has potential of the VJackson, Floyd, Gates, and LT days. Not comparing the players, just overall offense. |
| Quote: | | McCoy cited the presence of Philip Rivers as a primary factor in accepting the job. The respect is mutual. "Of the potential candidates, I can honestly say this is the guy I was hoping for," Rivers told XEPRS-AM on Tuesday. "I feel great about it." Jan 15 - 6:33 PM |
http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/1813/philip-rivers
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
schuttje
Joined: 24 Jan 2008
Posts: 2232
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| He is 2 years older than our rookie QB and proven. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
derekfelty
Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 739
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| No. we need our frist round draft pick. Plus his not gonna leave SD for us. He got his coach he wanted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BooyaCS
Joined: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 7520
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| schuttje wrote: | | Somebody please explain to me why Philip Rivers sucks. |
In the words of Bill Bellicheck... Diminishing skills.
Doesn't have the elite arm that he once had and cannot adjust. Still tries to think he can make throws that he cannot anymore.
Also he is somewhat of a head case and is 31 going to be 32. 6 years ago i may make that trade.
_________________
“From the ashes a fire shall be woken, a light from the shadows shall spring; renenwed shall be blade that was broken, the crownless again shall be king.” -- J R R Tolkien LOTR |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Estonianzulu
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 27078
Location: Middle of Nowhere VA
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| schuttje wrote: | | Somebody please explain to me why Philip Rivers sucks. |
He's a turnover machine.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
schuttje
Joined: 24 Jan 2008
Posts: 2232
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Next option then is Alex Smith? I don't hate the idea of Weeden starting in 2013, just weighing my options. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dropkick_pride
Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Posts: 10805
Location: C-bus
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| schuttje wrote: | | Next option then is Alex Smith? I don't hate the idea of Weeden starting in 2013, just weighing my options. |
Alex Smith will cost a pretty penny to get him.
He was performing at a very high level when he went down with injury, and 49ers have no reason to release him.
_________________
Last edited by Dropkick_pride on Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:13 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
