NFL Forum :: - La Canfora tweets that Bears are hiring Mel Tucker as DC

Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

FAQ Register Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in

FootballsFuture.com Home

La Canfora tweets that Bears are hiring Mel Tucker as DC
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Chicago Bears

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

PredatorPeppers

Joined: 14 Jan 2013
Posts: 95

Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:21 pm Post subject:

GOGRIESE wrote:

Madmike90 wrote:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

Hopefully he changes his " vanilla " style defense a little bit and blitzes, I don't want to see the same ol' cover 2 crap get lit up like a Christmas tree against good offenses that slant the crap out of the cover 2 into oblivion. I guess you could say I am disappointed with this hire, unless he changes his philosophy some.

We have already established that this is simply untrue.

Well if you repeat it in every thread then maybe itll come true! Laughing

What do you believe Mr. GOGRIESE?

Wes

Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 720

Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:36 pm Post subject:

Solid hire, no need to play around with the defense this year. We have a team built to win this year.

I am just praying Trestman can get this offense to at least tap into some of its potential.

GOGRIESE

Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Posts: 14651
Location: Use to live in Chicago Now Im in Austin Texas

Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:44 pm Post subject:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

GOGRIESE wrote:

Madmike90 wrote:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

We have already established that this is simply untrue.

Well if you repeat it in every thread then maybe itll come true! Laughing

What do you believe Mr. GOGRIESE?

Exactly what Superman and MM90 have been trying to pound into your brain the past few days.
_________________

^^ props to Ty on the sig Smile

War room link
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=512157

BonanzaHawk

Joined: 14 Jan 2013
Posts: 47

Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:51 pm Post subject:

No need to change the defense at all. We're a very good defense. We'll need to transition generationally, but there's no need to change in philosophy.

We got a new offense to pair with our old offense, and Tucker is being brought in for that, or at least closely resembling it.

ChiSportsFan

Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Posts: 5574

Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:57 pm Post subject:

GOGRIESE wrote:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

GOGRIESE wrote:

Madmike90 wrote:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

We have already established that this is simply untrue.

Well if you repeat it in every thread then maybe itll come true! Laughing

What do you believe Mr. GOGRIESE?

Exactly what Superman and MM90 have been trying to pound into your brain the past few days.

Meatball fans be meatball fans...

PredatorPeppers

Joined: 14 Jan 2013
Posts: 95

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:05 am Post subject:

GOGRIESE wrote:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

GOGRIESE wrote:

Madmike90 wrote:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

We have already established that this is simply untrue.

Well if you repeat it in every thread then maybe itll come true! Laughing

What do you believe Mr. GOGRIESE?

Exactly what Superman and MM90 have been trying to pound into your brain the past few days.

Can

Not

Compute Drool

GOGRIESE

Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Posts: 14651
Location: Use to live in Chicago Now Im in Austin Texas

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:09 am Post subject:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

GOGRIESE wrote:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

GOGRIESE wrote:

Madmike90 wrote:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

We have already established that this is simply untrue.

Well if you repeat it in every thread then maybe itll come true! Laughing

What do you believe Mr. GOGRIESE?

Exactly what Superman and MM90 have been trying to pound into your brain the past few days.

Can

Not

Compute Drool

Clearly....
_________________

^^ props to Ty on the sig Smile

War room link
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=512157

PredatorPeppers

Joined: 14 Jan 2013
Posts: 95

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:17 am Post subject:

GOGRIESE wrote:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

GOGRIESE wrote:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

GOGRIESE wrote:

Madmike90 wrote:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

We have already established that this is simply untrue.

Well if you repeat it in every thread then maybe itll come true! Laughing

What do you believe Mr. GOGRIESE?

Exactly what Superman and MM90 have been trying to pound into your brain the past few days.

Can

Not

Compute Drool

Clearly....

Just be content with a good but not great defense that is predictable and will continue to fold at the end of games against superior teams, as well as allow about 100 quick slants over the middle per game.

AZBearsFan

Joined: 04 Feb 2006
Posts: 8911

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:49 am Post subject:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

GOGRIESE wrote:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

GOGRIESE wrote:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

GOGRIESE wrote:

Madmike90 wrote:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

We have already established that this is simply untrue.

Well if you repeat it in every thread then maybe itll come true! Laughing

What do you believe Mr. GOGRIESE?

Exactly what Superman and MM90 have been trying to pound into your brain the past few days.

Can

Not

Compute Drool

Clearly....

Every defense is susceptible to something, and the cover 2 is no different. If you think our defense that was 3rd in points allowed, 1st in takeaways (with at least 9 more than everyone but NE) and top 10 in run defense, pass defense, sacks, 1st downs allowed, 3rd down percentage and penalties taken was the problem then I'm not sure we watched the same games. Without that D being as good as it was we wouldn't have been 10-6. We would have been 6-10. Or worse. Our defense got rolled once - against San Francisco. In case you aren't paying attention, that same team is the odds on favorite to win the Super Bowl in a few weeks.
_________________

GRRLacher wrote:

I told you guys AZ was awesome...he in fact makes triple the pay I get for moderating here.

IronMike84

Joined: 17 Jun 2009
Posts: 5918

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:04 am Post subject:

PredatorPeppers wrote:

1. There are routes that beat every coverage. That's football.

2. I know what your response is going to be: "well then mix up coverages!" Right, because the best QBs in the league don't know how to read coverages and just assume the Bears use the same coverage every play. Rolling Eyes

3. But I know what you want: change for the sake of change, like people who insist the Bears should switch to a 3-4.

4. Above all, if you truly believe the Bears played Cover 2/Tampa 2 on every down or nearly every down under Lovie, you're greatly mistaken. It has been well documented that they played a great deal of zone (and man during the Marinelli years) under Cover 1 and Cover 3 shells. Anybody who refuses to believe this just has no place debating it, because they're obviously much happier wallowing in sheer ignorance than accepting the truth.

Go back and look the threads following Bears/Pats, December 12, 2010 for this topic in detail, with a tremendous amount of stupidity topped off by wiscbearsfan schooling everybody (yes, my I have a knack for remembering these things).
_________________

Rotoworld.com wrote:

...internet mock drafts, which have ridiculously become the measuring stick for where players are "supposed" to go.

IronMike84

Joined: 17 Jun 2009
Posts: 5918

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 2:58 am Post subject:

Accurate of Tucker's D? http://www.scardraft.com/2gap43.html
_________________

Rotoworld.com wrote:

...internet mock drafts, which have ridiculously become the measuring stick for where players are "supposed" to go.

CBears019

Joined: 03 Aug 2008
Posts: 14774
Location: Iowa City, IA

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:02 am Post subject:

IronMike84 wrote:

Accurate of Tucker's D? http://www.scardraft.com/2gap43.html

Pretty sure that site belongs to a a Falcons poster on FF.
_________________
Martellus Bennet highlight video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lP8fHN53t0

Superman(DH23)

Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 16433
Location: Abdi on the sick sig

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:44 am Post subject:

IronMike84 wrote:

Accurate of Tucker's D? http://www.scardraft.com/2gap43.html

No, this is 3 years old, not reflective of what Tucker has done.
_________________

OneBadCat wrote:

Ahah Okay first of all Gamble was lost to IR this year but when healthy he proved to be 2nd only to Revis last season.

bears2308

Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 2387
Location: Indianapolis

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:46 am Post subject:

[quote="BonanzaHawk"]From a Jags site:

Quote:

Then came defensive coordinator Mel Tucker and his vanilla 4-3.
A vanilla 4-3 is majorly different from a 4-3 that uses its linebackers to blitz gaps between defensive tackles and defensive ends or other scheming to change matchups, create mismatches, and find advantages. Tucker’s version relies on strong play from his defensive personnel. His defense is reliant on strong pressure from the front four (defensive tackles and defensive ends) that free up the linebackers and secondary to make plays either due to good containment or a good pass rush.

Re-signing of Melton deemed imminent. Keep it going, Emery. I like.

Madmike90

Joined: 25 Jan 2009
Posts: 18579
Location: Scotland

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:54 am Post subject:

[quote="bears2308"]

BonanzaHawk wrote:

From a Jags site:

Quote:

Re-signing of Melton deemed imminent. Keep it going, Emery. I like.

Slightly worried about this to be fair…Melton is from Texas…Marinelli just went to the Cowboys…Jerry Jones is known for giving out massive contracts…the Cowboys need a new UT for Kiffin’s scheme…the quicker he is resigned the more comfortable I will feel.

Display posts from previous:

       FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Chicago Bears All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Page 3 of 4

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum