Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Pryor's trade value?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JTagg7754


Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 12328
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

blancanieve wrote:
Nodisrespect wrote:
Mr.Bob Dobalina wrote:
Gotta be kidding. Pryor has zero trade value.
so you think if Pryor was cut he would never play in this league again? There are NFL scouts for every team at every game and you don't think any of them were intrigued by his limited.play? You know there.is blog on ESPN saying a team like the eagles may already be looking at him. He has value and if we can get the right price and the coaches don't like him anything
could happen.


That's what i don't understand outside of a couple bad throws against the Chargers the kid played well he has talent he just needs coaching


He's had solid coaching for quite a while now. Roughly five years. He still has these problems. Just food for thought.
_________________


PM sig requests.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SilverLining


Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 298
Location: Virginia
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I live in Virginia and unfortunately have to see a lot of Virginia Tech games. I wouldn't touch Logan Thomas.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JTagg7754


Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 12328
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
Mr.Bob Dobalina wrote:
Gotta be kidding. Pryor has zero trade value.


This...

I would rather take Logan Thomas? As his balls don't rainbow as much. Rolling Eyes
Even keeping Pryor I'd take him in the 5th but we have no 5th. Laughing
If we don't trade down, then I could see a QB with our 3rd if a 'prospect' falls that far but meh...


I don't want anything to do w/ Logan Thomas. He looks awful.
_________________


PM sig requests.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ch8878


Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 2620
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pryor has better trade value this year because the Eagles, Redskins, and 49ers could want him as a back-up in their systems.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DOCLEW 28


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10898
Location: East Oakland
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JTagg7754 wrote:
oakdb36 wrote:
I don't know. I'd think if someone was interested in him, a 3rd should be our asking price. Not that i think he's really worth it at this point but if you really want a QB, a 3rd isn't too expensive.


Precisely what I was thinking also.... or Nick Foles in a perfect world Smile


I would take a 4th or 5th AND Foles. I do that like yesterday.
_________________

Raider X hooked me with the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ch8878


Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 2620
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DOCLEW 28 wrote:
JTagg7754 wrote:
oakdb36 wrote:
I don't know. I'd think if someone was interested in him, a 3rd should be our asking price. Not that i think he's really worth it at this point but if you really want a QB, a 3rd isn't too expensive.


Precisely what I was thinking also.... or Nick Foles in a perfect world Smile


I would take a 4th or 5th AND Foles. I do that like yesterday.


The Raiders might have to send the Eagles a draft pick and Pryor for Foles.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DOCLEW 28


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10898
Location: East Oakland
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not if they come to us. It could be Foles or nothing. Take it or leave it. We aren't coming to them with our hat in our hands. So why not swing for the fenses?
_________________

Raider X hooked me with the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ch8878


Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 2620
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DOCLEW 28 wrote:
Not if they come to us. It could be Foles or nothing. Take it or leave it. We aren't coming to them with our hat in our hands. So why not swing for the fenses?


It would be great just a even swap. Razz
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
101Raider


Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 2491
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What about with the Seahawks? They get a backup similar in style to Wilson and we get Flynn, I'm guessing our front office is pretty familiar with the QB.

I know the high contact would certainly be an issue though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
holyghost


Joined: 18 Jan 2007
Posts: 5774
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ch8878 wrote:
DOCLEW 28 wrote:
Not if they come to us. It could be Foles or nothing. Take it or leave it. We aren't coming to them with our hat in our hands. So why not swing for the fenses?


It would be great just a even swap. Razz


No it wouldn't. I am not buying on Foles. Seems no different than the run of the mill Philly backup. Some guy they make look good for a game or two then drop on some other team for much more than he's worth.

I'd rather keep Pryor and draft our own young passers. Any QB a team is willing to give up is Fool's Gold.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Django


Joined: 03 May 2012
Posts: 3013
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shawn Zobel ‏@ShawnZobel_DHQ
Just leaving IMG Academy. My opinion: Geno Smith most talented but erratic, Tyler Wilson the most NFL-ready, Zac Dysert improving quickly
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raiders707


Joined: 25 Sep 2008
Posts: 621
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some people here say that they want Pryor to sit and learn others sayingb lets trade him. Qbs take time low risk high reward I hope we dont trade him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Burgesskills


Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Posts: 1114
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
No it wouldn't. I am not buying on Foles. Seems no different than the run of the mill Philly backup. Some guy they make look good for a game or two then drop on some other team for much more than he's worth.

I'd rather keep Pryor and draft our own young passers. Any QB a team is willing to give up is Fool's Gold.


Good points, I'm surprised how high people are on him. He didn't look great....remember how Kevin Kolb was the toast of the town and everyone in this forum wanted him, reminds of him and that situation.

I don't want Foles, Pryor's upside far exceeds his.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JTagg7754


Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 12328
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

101Raider wrote:
What about with the Seahawks? They get a backup similar in style to Wilson and we get Flynn, I'm guessing our front office is pretty familiar with the QB.

I know the high contact would certainly be an issue though.


I don't think Flynn is any good but if he were to come here and restructure, I'd be all for it. He's a better back-up option.
_________________


PM sig requests.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Baggabonez


Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 6233
Location: RaiderNation
PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

La_Vader wrote:
I wouldn't trade Pryor for any prospect in this years draft. Quote me on that

This is the kind of lunacy that makes me question the relevancy of humankind . . . .
_________________
Nodisrespect wrote:
(on building inside out) teams without highly draft DT's make the playoffs and win the superbowl regularly.

Bonez wrote:
Teams that win Superbowls and make the playoffs aren't picking in the Top 5, clearly
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group