Poll: Which head coach is going to do a better job?

fsubrowns9510 · Joined: 20 Feb 2008 Posts: 12520 Location: Rochester, NY

I figured since all 3 of these guys were a viable option for the Browns this offseason, it might be nice to take a poll and see which of the 3 is going to be a better Head Coach.
_________________

Browns Forum HOF Member Class of 2011

Drifter · Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Posts: 247

I picked Chud. Gotta have faith that this time will be different.

derekfelty · Joined: 11 Apr 2010 Posts: 566

Chud is the better coach in this years coaching! #GOBROWNS!
_________________
NFL: Titans_Ravens_
NCAA: Texas_LSU_

buno67 · Joined: 15 Mar 2007 Posts: 24022 Location: Chubs for Chud

i say chud, he will actually have a couple players who know his system and know the way he might coach the team. thats more you can say about any other team.

Also chud has more present NFL exp. Tres was in the CFL for a couple years and Marrone has been in college the past couple years.

I think early on, it might be chud but Tres might have a chance at overtaking him because of all the experience he has in general
_________________

XBL:buno67
PSN:mcolabuno

KamTrus20 · Joined: 17 Nov 2009 Posts: 4770

Depends on how you want to judge them. If you are going to base it off wins next year and make rash conclusions like Browns fans do then the fan base is going to be jumping off bridges next year saying we should have went Trestman bc the Bears will win 3-4 more games than the Browns. If you are talking about long term and sustainable success then I believe Chud is in the best position and will succeed with flying colors.
_________________

Jamison on the sig

DawgSoldier · Joined: 30 Oct 2007 Posts: 5947 Location: Medina OH

Tressman. he has the most experiance at building something from the ground up while being a HC.
_________________
The Dawgpounds new three headed monster!

Adopt a Brown: QB Brandon Weeden
247/433 57% 2820yds 6.5avg 13 TD 15 Int

fsubrowns9510 · Joined: 20 Feb 2008 Posts: 12520 Location: Rochester, NY

Guess you can add Chip Kelly into this mix!
_________________

Browns Forum HOF Member Class of 2011

LETSGOBROWNIES · Joined: 06 Feb 2006 Posts: 6840 Location: CINCINNATI

bulldog · Joined: 18 Nov 2008 Posts: 4365 Location: Salem

I opened this thread with the original thought that Chip Kelly was going to be part of the thread.

Then I was going to post "Chip Kelly is dead to me"..

....but there wasn't. So i voted instead.
_________________
2013 First Ballot Recipient of the Joe Blackburn Award

bruceb · Joined: 15 Dec 2006 Posts: 5327 Location: Rocky River, OH

Substitute Kelly's name for Marrone, because I don't remember reading a single word about Marrone that registered as a possible answer to the question: Why?

Chud, Trestman and Kelly have one main thing in common: Offensive creativity.

Chud's creativity has gotten acclaim around the NFL based on his continuous NFL experience.

Trestman got high marks for his work in the NFL and probably learned a few twists in the CFL.

Kelly is a headcase who's schemes playing with boys will not translate well, imho, to the NFL. Bits and pieces, yes, but even then there is the question: How does he handle dealing with men?

I'd say it's a tie between Chud and Trestman.
_________________
Everything happens exactly the way it is supposed to happen...otherwise, it would happen some other way

mistakebytehlak · Joined: 20 Nov 2005 Posts: 38703 Location: Brooklyn, NY

mtmmike · Joined: 27 Nov 2009 Posts: 477

trestman probably 11 or 12 wins chud first pick if we switch to the 3-4

bruceb · Joined: 15 Dec 2006 Posts: 5327 Location: Rocky River, OH

bungleodeon · Joined: 19 Mar 2009 Posts: 7878

So when the Packers switched from the 4-3 to the 3-4 and got a lot better means it's impossible for us to do the same thing? (there are other examples of teams IMPROVING in their first year in a defensive scheme change, it just seems like everyone is just assuming we'll get worse or have major growing pains because it happened when we switched from the 4-3 to the 3-4 and then when we switched back)
_________________
Adopt-a-Brown: Jabaal Sheard - Stats:
2011: 55 Tackles - 8.5 Sacks - 5 FF - 1 FR - 2 PD - 7 STF
2012: 54 Tackles - 7 Sacks - 1 FF - 3 PD - 2 STF

mtmmike · Joined: 27 Nov 2009 Posts: 477

[quote="bungleodeon"]So when the Packers switched from the 4-3 to the 3-4 and got a lot better means it's impossible for us to do the same thing? (there are other examples of teams IMPROVING in their first year in a defensive scheme change, it just seems like everyone is just assuming we'll get worse or have major growing pains because it happened when we switched from the 4-3 to the 3-4 and then when we switched back)[/quo

this draft is weak in linebackers.
Sheard has never played in a 3-4.
new dc will probably lose four games before he even understands what he has.
square peg round hole one experienced 3-4 lineman , are dl are all 4-3 lineman.

this team only won 5 games.
who besides this board wants pogano?