Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Poll: Which head coach is going to do a better job?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Cleveland Browns
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Which of these recent new hires is going to be the better coach?
Rob Chudzinski (Cleveland)
66%
 66%  [ 18 ]
Marc Trestman (Chicago)
29%
 29%  [ 8 ]
Doug Marrone (Buffalo)
3%
 3%  [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 27

Author Message
fsubrowns9510


Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 13235
Location: Rochester, NY
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:42 am    Post subject: Poll: Which head coach is going to do a better job? Reply with quote

I figured since all 3 of these guys were a viable option for the Browns this offseason, it might be nice to take a poll and see which of the 3 is going to be a better Head Coach.
_________________


Browns Forum HOF Member Class of 2011
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Drifter


Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 276
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I picked Chud. Gotta have faith that this time will be different.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
derekfelty


Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Posts: 738
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chud is the better coach in this years coaching! #GOBROWNS!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
buno67


Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 30995
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i say chud, he will actually have a couple players who know his system and know the way he might coach the team. thats more you can say about any other team.

Also chud has more present NFL exp. Tres was in the CFL for a couple years and Marrone has been in college the past couple years.

I think early on, it might be chud but Tres might have a chance at overtaking him because of all the experience he has in general
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
KamTrus20


Joined: 17 Nov 2009
Posts: 5331
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Depends on how you want to judge them. If you are going to base it off wins next year and make rash conclusions like Browns fans do then the fan base is going to be jumping off bridges next year saying we should have went Trestman bc the Bears will win 3-4 more games than the Browns. If you are talking about long term and sustainable success then I believe Chud is in the best position and will succeed with flying colors.
_________________


Jamison on the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DawgSoldier


Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Posts: 5947
Location: Medina OH
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tressman. he has the most experiance at building something from the ground up while being a HC.
_________________
The Dawgpounds new three headed monster!

Adopt a Brown: QB Brandon Weeden
247/433 57% 2820yds 6.5avg 13 TD 15 Int
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
fsubrowns9510


Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 13235
Location: Rochester, NY
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 2:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guess you can add Chip Kelly into this mix!
_________________


Browns Forum HOF Member Class of 2011
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
LETSGOBROWNIES


Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 7900
Location: CINCINNATI
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DawgSoldier wrote:
Tressman. he has the most experiance at building something from the ground up while being a HC.


And he has far and away the most talent to work with.
_________________


First Ballot Cleveland Browns Forum Hall of Fame Inductee.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bulldog


Moderator
Joined: 18 Nov 2008
Posts: 5790
Location: Salem
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I opened this thread with the original thought that Chip Kelly was going to be part of the thread.

Then I was going to post "Chip Kelly is dead to me"..

....but there wasn't. So i voted instead.
_________________
2013 First Ballot Recipient of the Joe Blackburn Award
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bruceb


Joined: 15 Dec 2006
Posts: 6800
Location: Rocky River, OH
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Substitute Kelly's name for Marrone, because I don't remember reading a single word about Marrone that registered as a possible answer to the question: Why?

Chud, Trestman and Kelly have one main thing in common: Offensive creativity.

Chud's creativity has gotten acclaim around the NFL based on his continuous NFL experience.

Trestman got high marks for his work in the NFL and probably learned a few twists in the CFL.

Kelly is a headcase who's schemes playing with boys will not translate well, imho, to the NFL. Bits and pieces, yes, but even then there is the question: How does he handle dealing with men?

I'd say it's a tie between Chud and Trestman.
_________________
Everything happens exactly the way it is supposed to happen...otherwise, it would happen some other way
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mistakebytehlak


Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 44547
Location: Brooklyn, NY
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bruceb wrote:
Substitute Kelly's name for Marrone, because I don't remember reading a single word about Marrone that registered as a possible answer to the question: Why?

Chud, Trestman and Kelly have one main thing in common: Offensive creativity.

Chud's creativity has gotten acclaim around the NFL based on his continuous NFL experience.

Trestman got high marks for his work in the NFL and probably learned a few twists in the CFL.

Kelly is a headcase who's schemes playing with boys will not translate well, imho, to the NFL. Bits and pieces, yes, but even then there is the question: How does he handle dealing with men?

I'd say it's a tie between Chud and Trestman.


The bolded is a valid question and the one question that kept me from being fully gung ho on Chip Kelly

That is to say- just because he hasn't proved that he can deal with men it does not mean he cannot.

I did like Chip because of his usage of modern statistical analysis in his game planning- a tide of moneyball can help a coach really step up his game, imo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mtmmike


Joined: 27 Nov 2009
Posts: 647
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

trestman probably 11 or 12 wins chud first pick if we switch to the 3-4
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bruceb


Joined: 15 Dec 2006
Posts: 6800
Location: Rocky River, OH
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mtmmike wrote:
trestman probably 11 or 12 wins chud first pick if we switch to the 3-4


With the talent already on CHI's roster, that's reasonable.

While I don't think switching to a 3-4 will hurt us that much if we acquire the right players in FA and the draft, it still will be a switch, which will cost us wins early in the season.

Not so many that we pick first, however, although that might not be a bad thing if we could get Clowney or a franchise QB!
_________________
Everything happens exactly the way it is supposed to happen...otherwise, it would happen some other way
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bungleodeon


Joined: 19 Mar 2009
Posts: 8883
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So when the Packers switched from the 4-3 to the 3-4 and got a lot better means it's impossible for us to do the same thing? (there are other examples of teams IMPROVING in their first year in a defensive scheme change, it just seems like everyone is just assuming we'll get worse or have major growing pains because it happened when we switched from the 4-3 to the 3-4 and then when we switched back)
_________________
Adopt-a-Brown: Jabaal Sheard - Stats:
First 3 seasons: 135 Tackles - 21 Sacks - 7 FF - 2 FR - 9 PD - 11 STF
2014: TBD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mtmmike


Joined: 27 Nov 2009
Posts: 647
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 12:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="bungleodeon"]So when the Packers switched from the 4-3 to the 3-4 and got a lot better means it's impossible for us to do the same thing? (there are other examples of teams IMPROVING in their first year in a defensive scheme change, it just seems like everyone is just assuming we'll get worse or have major growing pains because it happened when we switched from the 4-3 to the 3-4 and then when we switched back)[/quo

this draft is weak in linebackers.
Sheard has never played in a 3-4.
new dc will probably lose four games before he even understands what he has.
square peg round hole one experienced 3-4 lineman , are dl are all 4-3 lineman.

this team only won 5 games.
who besides this board wants pogano?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Cleveland Browns All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group