| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Tamby
Joined: 10 Jan 2013
Posts: 36
Location: NY
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:15 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| JTagg7754 wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | Tamby wrote: | I can't stand when people hate on Palmer, he is without a doubt the best QB we've had since Gannon. Last year in Hue Jack's offense considering how he came off the couch to play quarterback for us he did phenomenal (1 week to learn playbook, no Mcfadden, no defense). The WRs got much more involved once he stepped in for Campbell.
This year knapp just plain F'd us. Our run game was worse and so was our defense, yet he still put up pretty good numbers. Palmer isn't the most mobile of quarterbacks but he made some tough throws under pressure that guys like J Cam, etc would have crumbled.
It also doesn't help that the players didn't buy into what Knapp was selling, that definitely hurt our production. |
A new poster with common sense? How about that. |
Fo ril. I like it! |
Ha thanks guys, been a hardcore fan for years its just time to start venting about this team with others |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JTagg7754
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7249
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tamby wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | Tamby wrote: | I can't stand when people hate on Palmer, he is without a doubt the best QB we've had since Gannon. Last year in Hue Jack's offense considering how he came off the couch to play quarterback for us he did phenomenal (1 week to learn playbook, no Mcfadden, no defense). The WRs got much more involved once he stepped in for Campbell.
This year knapp just plain F'd us. Our run game was worse and so was our defense, yet he still put up pretty good numbers. Palmer isn't the most mobile of quarterbacks but he made some tough throws under pressure that guys like J Cam, etc would have crumbled.
It also doesn't help that the players didn't buy into what Knapp was selling, that definitely hurt our production. |
A new poster with common sense? How about that. |
Fo ril. I like it! |
Ha thanks guys, been a hardcore fan for years its just time to start venting about this team with others |
We all like to vent! That's for damn sure. It's just good to see someone vent that isn't naive as to what is going on. Most of us appreciate it haha. We'll always be divided to some sort though. At first it was pro-Al to no-Al now it's pro-Palmer to no-Palmer haha. At least in recent times. It's all in good fun though. No one here has any legit beef w/ one-another. When it boils down to it, we're all fans of the same team we just view the problems differently.
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Darkness
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 4169
Location: CA-TX
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tamby wrote: | | Darkness wrote: | | Raidin wrote: | | Tamby wrote: | I can't stand when people hate on Palmer, he is without a doubt the best QB we've had since Gannon. Last year in Hue Jack's offense considering how he came off the couch to play quarterback for us he did phenomenal (1 week to learn playbook, no Mcfadden, no defense). The WRs got much more involved once he stepped in for Campbell.
This year knapp just plain F'd us. Our run game was worse and so was our defense, yet he still put up pretty good numbers. Palmer isn't the most mobile of quarterbacks but he made some tough throws under pressure that guys like J Cam, etc would have crumbled.
It also doesn't help that the players didn't buy into what Knapp was selling, that definitely hurt our production. |
For Palmer our run was actually better than last year. |
Not. Bush started to really wear down down the stretch, but his first 4 games after taking over for McFadden were better then anything we saw this season. And we were actually able to move the chains and score TD's with the running game. We had something like 4 rushing TD's all season?  |
Yes exactly, we were a JOKE on offense this year and its a shame because our offense is what carried this team to .500 last year. We actually made PLAYS on offense last year, we were super aggressive, and were in a lot of competitive games. Watching games last year us fans could actually have confidence in our offense to score points and stay in ball games.
Everyone loves to hate on Hue Jackson but the fact is when Hue Jackson hasn't been running our offense the most games we've won since 2003 is five. |
Agreed. We underachieved big time on offense. Very disappointing.
Welcome to the forum btw.
_________________
El ramster made the sig!
| candyman93 wrote: | | Reading Darkness posts you'd think the warriors were playoff contenders |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12585
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Silver&Black88 wrote: | | Tamby wrote: | I can't stand when people hate on Palmer, he is without a doubt the best QB we've had since Gannon. Last year in Hue Jack's offense considering how he came off the couch to play quarterback for us he did phenomenal (1 week to learn playbook, no Mcfadden, no defense). The WRs got much more involved once he stepped in for Campbell.
This year knapp just plain F'd us. Our run game was worse and so was our defense, yet he still put up pretty good numbers. Palmer isn't the most mobile of quarterbacks but he made some tough throws under pressure that guys like J Cam, etc would have crumbled.
It also doesn't help that the players didn't buy into what Knapp was selling, that definitely hurt our production. |
A new poster with common sense? How about that. |
why is its only/always common sense if they agree with your argument?
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12585
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JTagg7754 wrote: | | La_Vader wrote: | | For Pryor lack of ability to throw, he scored three touchdowns in the rain, didn't get sacked, moved the chains on key plays, provided hope for the team, all within a couple of days of being named starter |
Let me tell you what really happened:
He scored 1 TD when the game was w/in real reach
He scored 2 TDs in garbage time to make the score look better
Prior to the 4th quarter (when we could assume garbage time started) he went three and out about 70% of the drives
So, while he did have 3 TDs, I can do the same w/ Palmer almost all year but you'd just bring up garbage time so I figured I'd so the same, and he wasn't very effective most of the game.... at all. In fact, he had one drive that was a 6 and out so it's not like he was "moving the chains" etc etc. He wasn't effective... at all. |
thats my point we get the same results with tp or cp its just tp cost 10 mill less.
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dante9876
Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 17528
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | La_Vader wrote: | | For Pryor lack of ability to throw, he scored three touchdowns in the rain, didn't get sacked, moved the chains on key plays, provided hope for the team, all within a couple of days of being named starter |
Let me tell you what really happened:
He scored 1 TD when the game was w/in real reach
He scored 2 TDs in garbage time to make the score look better
Prior to the 4th quarter (when we could assume garbage time started) he went three and out about 70% of the drives
So, while he did have 3 TDs, I can do the same w/ Palmer almost all year but you'd just bring up garbage time so I figured I'd so the same, and he wasn't very effective most of the game.... at all. In fact, he had one drive that was a 6 and out so it's not like he was "moving the chains" etc etc. He wasn't effective... at all. |
thats my point we get the same results with tp or cp its just tp cost 10 mill less. |
Winner winner chicken dinner. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Silver&Black88
Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 24644
Location: Rochester, NY
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | Tamby wrote: | I can't stand when people hate on Palmer, he is without a doubt the best QB we've had since Gannon. Last year in Hue Jack's offense considering how he came off the couch to play quarterback for us he did phenomenal (1 week to learn playbook, no Mcfadden, no defense). The WRs got much more involved once he stepped in for Campbell.
This year knapp just plain F'd us. Our run game was worse and so was our defense, yet he still put up pretty good numbers. Palmer isn't the most mobile of quarterbacks but he made some tough throws under pressure that guys like J Cam, etc would have crumbled.
It also doesn't help that the players didn't buy into what Knapp was selling, that definitely hurt our production. |
A new poster with common sense? How about that. |
why is its only/always common sense if they agree with your argument? |
Well, if that's the case then I guess you're indirectly saying that I have common sense. Thanks homeboy  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nodisrespect
Joined: 28 Nov 2009
Posts: 2912
Location: in the present
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Silver&Black88 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | Tamby wrote: | I can't stand when people hate on Palmer, he is without a doubt the best QB we've had since Gannon. Last year in Hue Jack's offense considering how he came off the couch to play quarterback for us he did phenomenal (1 week to learn playbook, no Mcfadden, no defense). The WRs got much more involved once he stepped in for Campbell.
This year knapp just plain F'd us. Our run game was worse and so was our defense, yet he still put up pretty good numbers. Palmer isn't the most mobile of quarterbacks but he made some tough throws under pressure that guys like J Cam, etc would have crumbled.
It also doesn't help that the players didn't buy into what Knapp was selling, that definitely hurt our production. |
A new poster with common sense? How about that. |
why is its only/always common sense if they agree with your argument? |
Well, if that's the case then I guess you're indirectly saying that I have common sense. Thanks homeboy |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DOCLEW 28
Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10587
Location: East Oakland
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JTagg7754 wrote: | | La_Vader wrote: | | For Pryor lack of ability to throw, he scored three touchdowns in the rain, didn't get sacked, moved the chains on key plays, provided hope for the team, all within a couple of days of being named starter |
Let me tell you what really happened:
He scored 1 TD when the game was w/in real reach
He scored 2 TDs in garbage time to make the score look better
Prior to the 4th quarter (when we could assume garbage time started) he went three and out about 70% of the drives
So, while he did have 3 TDs, I can do the same w/ Palmer almost all year but you'd just bring up garbage time so I figured I'd so the same, and he wasn't very effective most of the game.... at all. In fact, he had one drive that was a 6 and out so it's not like he was "moving the chains" etc etc. He wasn't effective... at all. |
I usually stay out of your Pryor conversations/rants because I know you don't like the kid. But garbage time? We were one onside kick away from having a chance to win the thing. I would call garbage time scoring in a double digit loss in the 20's.
_________________
Raider X hooked me with the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DOCLEW 28
Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10587
Location: East Oakland
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nodisrespect wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Silver&Black88 wrote: | | Tamby wrote: | I can't stand when people hate on Palmer, he is without a doubt the best QB we've had since Gannon. Last year in Hue Jack's offense considering how he came off the couch to play quarterback for us he did phenomenal (1 week to learn playbook, no Mcfadden, no defense). The WRs got much more involved once he stepped in for Campbell.
This year knapp just plain F'd us. Our run game was worse and so was our defense, yet he still put up pretty good numbers. Palmer isn't the most mobile of quarterbacks but he made some tough throws under pressure that guys like J Cam, etc would have crumbled.
It also doesn't help that the players didn't buy into what Knapp was selling, that definitely hurt our production. |
A new poster with common sense? How about that. |
why is its only/always common sense if they agree with your argument? |
Well, if that's the case then I guess you're indirectly saying that I have common sense. Thanks homeboy |
|
Jeez, you guys seriously crack me the hell up. LOL!!!
_________________
Raider X hooked me with the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dreadymatt
Joined: 05 Feb 2010
Posts: 758
Location: Saturn
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I like CP, but I don't like his salary hit for next year |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Darbsk
Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Posts: 617
Location: Wales, UK
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Raidin wrote: | | Tamby wrote: | I can't stand when people hate on Palmer, he is without a doubt the best QB we've had since Gannon. Last year in Hue Jack's offense considering how he came off the couch to play quarterback for us he did phenomenal (1 week to learn playbook, no Mcfadden, no defense). The WRs got much more involved once he stepped in for Campbell.
This year knapp just plain F'd us. Our run game was worse and so was our defense, yet he still put up pretty good numbers. Palmer isn't the most mobile of quarterbacks but he made some tough throws under pressure that guys like J Cam, etc would have crumbled.
It also doesn't help that the players didn't buy into what Knapp was selling, that definitely hurt our production. |
For Palmer our run was actually better than last year. |
I think all that Guinness must have gone to your head dude
I 100% hope Pryor has a long and successful career as a Raider QB but it seems that some Pryor supporters will just say anything to degrade Palmer. Carson Palmer did a good job this year in terrible circumstances and should start next year, hopefully Pryor is ready to take over in 2014 after being around CP and learning the nuances of pocket passing from Palmer.
_________________
“It may take us a short while, but we'll get that nastiness of the Raiders back.”
Mr. Al Davis RIP |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JTagg7754
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7249
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | La_Vader wrote: | | For Pryor lack of ability to throw, he scored three touchdowns in the rain, didn't get sacked, moved the chains on key plays, provided hope for the team, all within a couple of days of being named starter |
Let me tell you what really happened:
He scored 1 TD when the game was w/in real reach
He scored 2 TDs in garbage time to make the score look better
Prior to the 4th quarter (when we could assume garbage time started) he went three and out about 70% of the drives
So, while he did have 3 TDs, I can do the same w/ Palmer almost all year but you'd just bring up garbage time so I figured I'd so the same, and he wasn't very effective most of the game.... at all. In fact, he had one drive that was a 6 and out so it's not like he was "moving the chains" etc etc. He wasn't effective... at all. |
thats my point we get the same results with tp or cp its just tp cost 10 mill less. |
If you think Pryor is on Palmer's level, no one here can help you.
Honestly, I don't think you even finished my post after what you bold b/c what you said doesn't make sense....
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JTagg7754
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7249
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| dante9876 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | La_Vader wrote: | | For Pryor lack of ability to throw, he scored three touchdowns in the rain, didn't get sacked, moved the chains on key plays, provided hope for the team, all within a couple of days of being named starter |
Let me tell you what really happened:
He scored 1 TD when the game was w/in real reach
He scored 2 TDs in garbage time to make the score look better
Prior to the 4th quarter (when we could assume garbage time started) he went three and out about 70% of the drives
So, while he did have 3 TDs, I can do the same w/ Palmer almost all year but you'd just bring up garbage time so I figured I'd so the same, and he wasn't very effective most of the game.... at all. In fact, he had one drive that was a 6 and out so it's not like he was "moving the chains" etc etc. He wasn't effective... at all. |
thats my point we get the same results with tp or cp its just tp cost 10 mill less. |
Winner winner chicken dinner. |
Hardly b/c he didn't even make sense w/ his response to the context of what he quoted. And what he said isn't true. Anyone who thinks Pryor is on Palmer's level has to reevaluate things and actually WATCH games.
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JTagg7754
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7249
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DOCLEW 28 wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | La_Vader wrote: | | For Pryor lack of ability to throw, he scored three touchdowns in the rain, didn't get sacked, moved the chains on key plays, provided hope for the team, all within a couple of days of being named starter |
Let me tell you what really happened:
He scored 1 TD when the game was w/in real reach
He scored 2 TDs in garbage time to make the score look better
Prior to the 4th quarter (when we could assume garbage time started) he went three and out about 70% of the drives
So, while he did have 3 TDs, I can do the same w/ Palmer almost all year but you'd just bring up garbage time so I figured I'd so the same, and he wasn't very effective most of the game.... at all. In fact, he had one drive that was a 6 and out so it's not like he was "moving the chains" etc etc. He wasn't effective... at all. |
I usually stay out of your Pryor conversations/rants because I know you don't like the kid. But garbage time? We were one onside kick away from having a chance to win the thing. I would call garbage time scoring in a double digit loss in the 20's. |
LOL so being down 17 w/ 13 minutes to go isn't garbage time? He's also lucky we blocked that punt to give him an extremely short field also. So, yes, it was garbage time when he started the fourth quarter. Let's just not think about the first three quarters when discussing this game. Pro-Pryor people don't seem to like to do that b/c he wasn't any good... at all.
Not only this, DOCLEW, this is a subtle mock to the crap we heard all season from anti Palmer people. In fact, one of the brilliant minds we have said that Palmer was racking up garbage time stats in the 2nd quarter b/c we were down 20 already. So using their logic, this was far, far into garbage time.
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
