| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
KingOfTheHill84
Joined: 10 Jun 2012
Posts: 1011
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:45 am Post subject: Question Regarding Carson Palmer |
 |
|
|
Do you guys see management cutting him and trading back in the draft and picking up a young QB to build around.
- Palmer has no ties to management since they fired Hue Jackson
- You're picking 3rd so you could move back and grab a 2,3,6 in the process depending on the suitor, say a team trades up for Bjoern Werner. It will give you guys some more picks and depth
- Palmer will also save you guys some money on the cap because I know he's got a huge hit in 2013
what do you think?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bo_Spice
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 7076
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think he'll end up restructuring his contract, take a pay cut, and be back in Oakland next season.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DOCLEW 28
Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10599
Location: East Oakland
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I would me more than happy to do a sign and trade to the Jets for a 2nd rounder. 
_________________
Raider X hooked me with the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KingOfTheHill84
Joined: 10 Jun 2012
Posts: 1011
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DOCLEW 28 wrote: | | I would me more than happy to do a sign and trade to the Jets for a 2nd rounder. |
lol I feel bad that you guys dont have a 2nd because of that trade but again picking third could allow you guys to trade back and still draft a young QB later on(Matt Barkley, Tyler Wilson, Tyler Bray). I think thats best to be honest
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bo_Spice
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 7076
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| KingOfTheHill84 wrote: | | DOCLEW 28 wrote: | | I would me more than happy to do a sign and trade to the Jets for a 2nd rounder. |
lol I feel bad that you guys dont have a 2nd because of that trade but again picking third could allow you guys to trade back and still draft a young QB later on(Matt Barkley, Tyler Wilson, Tyler Bray). I think thats best to be honest |
We have more pressing needs than finding a young quarterback though. Our defensive line is the worst in the NFL, our secondary is terrible, and we need to upgrade the right side of our offensive line.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DOCLEW 28
Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10599
Location: East Oakland
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
And all those things can be obtained with a proper trade down. Especially early with OL picks.
_________________
Raider X hooked me with the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baggabonez
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 3855
Location: RaiderNation
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 6:47 am Post subject: Re: Question Regarding Carson Palmer |
|
|
|
| KingOfTheHill84 wrote: | Do you guys see management cutting him and trading back in the draft and picking up a young QB to build around.
- Palmer has no ties to management since they fired Hue Jackson
- You're picking 3rd so you could move back and grab a 2,3,6 in the process depending on the suitor, say a team trades up for Bjoern Werner. It will give you guys some more picks and depth
- Palmer will also save you guys some money on the cap because I know he's got a huge hit in 2013
what do you think? |
Q: you enter the 2013 season on the hot seat with Palmer and Pryor as your options. Next season isn't promised. Shut out the white noise and ask yourself . . . Who would you start if your career depended on 10 - 12 games?
Starting Pryor ensures two things: DA is safe in 2013 and 99% of potential offensive coordinatoring hires ain't signing on.
_________________
2013 Mancrush: DT Richardson, OT Joeckel, FS Vaccaro, FS Rambo, WR Dobson, RB Michael, TE McDonald, OT Foketi, WR Swope |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DOCLEW 28
Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10599
Location: East Oakland
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Again, that is a HUGE guess.
_________________
Raider X hooked me with the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chali21
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 1717
Location: Cali
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 10:19 am Post subject: Re: Question Regarding Carson Palmer |
|
|
|
| KingOfTheHill84 wrote: | Do you guys see management cutting him and trading back in the draft and picking up a young QB to build around.
- Palmer has no ties to management since they fired Hue Jackson
- You're picking 3rd so you could move back and grab a 2,3,6 in the process depending on the suitor, say a team trades up for Bjoern Werner. It will give you guys some more picks and depth
- Palmer will also save you guys some money on the cap because I know he's got a huge hit in 2013
what do you think? |
If the price is right, everyone is expendable I tell ya what. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
big_palooka
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 19233
Location: ATL
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 1:25 pm Post subject: Re: Question Regarding Carson Palmer |
|
|
|
| Chali21 wrote: | | KingOfTheHill84 wrote: | Do you guys see management cutting him and trading back in the draft and picking up a young QB to build around.
- Palmer has no ties to management since they fired Hue Jackson
- You're picking 3rd so you could move back and grab a 2,3,6 in the process depending on the suitor, say a team trades up for Bjoern Werner. It will give you guys some more picks and depth
- Palmer will also save you guys some money on the cap because I know he's got a huge hit in 2013
what do you think? |
If the price is right, everyone is expendable I tell ya what. |
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tamby
Joined: 10 Jan 2013
Posts: 43
Location: NY
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I can see the Cardinals or Vikings offering us a mid round pick for Palmer. Pair him with Fitzgerald and that defense and they might be on to something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baggabonez
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 3855
Location: RaiderNation
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2013 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Hmmm . . . if you interview Mike Martz I wonder which QB DA has in mind?
_________________
2013 Mancrush: DT Richardson, OT Joeckel, FS Vaccaro, FS Rambo, WR Dobson, RB Michael, TE McDonald, OT Foketi, WR Swope |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DOCLEW 28
Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10599
Location: East Oakland
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
You actually have no idea unless you can read minds.
_________________
Raider X hooked me with the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Play4Blood
Joined: 03 Feb 2010
Posts: 129
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
There's really not enough cap savings involved in getting rid of him to make it worthwhile. Best bet is that he either restructures with an extension or plays under his current contract.
Pryor earned the right to be considered a project QB, as opposed to the conversion project he seemed to be previously. I would assume he's earned the right to be the #2 and get more reps in practice. Assuming anything beyond that is a little ridiculous. Watching him throw the ball is...well...at least he's not Tebow. If not for Tebow, though, I'd wager Pryor's mechanics are the worst in the league. Doesn't seem to have much arm strength either.
Point of all this being that we don't have a viable option at QB other than Palmer, and we're still too unsettled to bring in a high pick QB to groom. Certainly not one from this crap class of passers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baggabonez
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 3855
Location: RaiderNation
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DOCLEW 28 wrote: | | You actually have no idea unless you can read minds. |
It's called deductive reasoning. How will you ever make detective without it? You would either have to be in denial or daft. By interviewing Martz which QB would we speculate the Raiders going with?
_________________
2013 Mancrush: DT Richardson, OT Joeckel, FS Vaccaro, FS Rambo, WR Dobson, RB Michael, TE McDonald, OT Foketi, WR Swope |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
