| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Nextyearfordaboyz 
Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 16250
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'm hoping we don't use this switch as an excuse to ignore our issues on the offensive side of the ball (namely offensive line). We can add a couple of players, but I also think we might need to roll the dice on some guys like Crawford, Wilber, etc. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Revenant04 
Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 265
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Question: I really like Bass and Calloway as players that might not start but contribute in the future. Where would they fit in the 4-3, if at all? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
matt79511
Joined: 10 Jul 2011 Posts: 2227
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nextyearfordaboyz wrote: | | I'm hoping we don't use this switch as an excuse to ignore our issues on the offensive side of the ball (namely offensive line). We can add a couple of players, but I also think we might need to roll the dice on some guys like Crawford, Wilber, etc. |
This. I think that's something people lose sight of when they do mock offseasons (and, later, criticize what holes the team didn't fill in the offseason). _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Matts4313 
Joined: 08 Dec 2004 Posts: 31204 Location: Cowboys Forum ROH Class of 12
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| matt79511 wrote: | | Nextyearfordaboyz wrote: | | I'm hoping we don't use this switch as an excuse to ignore our issues on the offensive side of the ball (namely offensive line). We can add a couple of players, but I also think we might need to roll the dice on some guys like Crawford, Wilber, etc. |
This. I think that's something people lose sight of when they do mock offseasons (and, later, criticize what holes the team didn't fill in the offseason). |
I agree completely. If anything, I think the move to the 4-3 can allow us to focus MORE attention to the offensive line early.
Its important to have pass rushing DTs.... Its also important to have guys that can stop them. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
G-osh
Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 238 Location: San Jose, CA
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Matts4313 wrote: | | matt79511 wrote: | | Nextyearfordaboyz wrote: | | I'm hoping we don't use this switch as an excuse to ignore our issues on the offensive side of the ball (namely offensive line). We can add a couple of players, but I also think we might need to roll the dice on some guys like Crawford, Wilber, etc. |
This. I think that's something people lose sight of when they do mock offseasons (and, later, criticize what holes the team didn't fill in the offseason). |
I agree completely. If anything, I think the move to the 4-3 can allow us to focus MORE attention to the offensive line early.
Its important to have pass rushing DTs.... Its also important to have guys that can stop them. |
I also hope that the switch will allow us to focus on O-line in the draft, and I mean a Tackle, Guard, and Center in the first two days. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DKDALfan 
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 1622 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Matts4313 wrote: | | matt79511 wrote: | | Nextyearfordaboyz wrote: | | I'm hoping we don't use this switch as an excuse to ignore our issues on the offensive side of the ball (namely offensive line). We can add a couple of players, but I also think we might need to roll the dice on some guys like Crawford, Wilber, etc. |
This. I think that's something people lose sight of when they do mock offseasons (and, later, criticize what holes the team didn't fill in the offseason). |
I agree completely. If anything, I think the move to the 4-3 can allow us to focus MORE attention to the offensive line early.
Its important to have pass rushing DTs.... Its also important to have guys that can stop them. |
ˆˆ this.
- I see less needs for us in a 4-3 then in the 3-4. I also think that it might have been a factor in the front office deciding to change scheme. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dboys88-82 
Joined: 12 Jan 2011 Posts: 1721
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Anyone know where orie lemon would fit? With the possibility of connor being cut i feel like lemon could provide greath depth somewhere. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superfly3176
Joined: 14 Nov 2011 Posts: 467
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Do you guys see us using Crawford? Personally I'm not sure we keep ratliff around. Can Hatcher play DT is this system and crawford DE? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nextyearfordaboyz 
Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 16250
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| superfly3176 wrote: | | Do you guys see us using Crawford? Personally I'm not sure we keep ratliff around. Can Hatcher play DT is this system and crawford DE? |
Hatcher will play DT, Crawford will play DE. How effective they will be is TBD.
Personally, I would roll the dice on Crawford for a year. If he doesn't cut it, then replace him next year. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DKDALfan 
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 1622 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nextyearfordaboyz wrote: | | superfly3176 wrote: | | Do you guys see us using Crawford? Personally I'm not sure we keep ratliff around. Can Hatcher play DT is this system and crawford DE? |
Hatcher will play DT, Crawford will play DE. How effective they will be is TBD.
Personally, I would roll the dice on Crawford for a year. If he doesn't cut it, then replace him next year. |
I would aswell unless there's a clear BPA. If Okafor or Ansah falls to our 2nd round pick, we should pick him. If not, I got no problem with giving Crawford a shot. We would still need to look for some depth.. Would like us to draft a DE in one of the later rounds.
- With that said, I wouldn't be to bummed with picking Ansah, or Okafor for that sake, in the 1st. But would rather have Cooper. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
matt79511
Joined: 10 Jul 2011 Posts: 2227
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dboys88-82 wrote: | | Anyone know where orie lemon would fit? With the possibility of connor being cut i feel like lemon could provide greath depth somewhere. |
Eh, thought he was more of a 3-4 thumper type. Maybe SAM. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DKDALfan 
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 1622 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dboys88-82 wrote: | | Anyone know where orie lemon would fit? With the possibility of connor being cut i feel like lemon could provide greath depth somewhere. |
He probably would be the best fit at ILB. My guess is that he is to big and doesn't have just as much speed that you would prefer from a OLB in a 4-3. But with Albright on the team, I think his snaps would be very limited depending on if he proves himself capable of being able to play OLB as well.
- I actually believe that Connor will stay on the team as a starter. Unless Te'o falls to us and we pick him.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Northland
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 3138 Location: Ajax, Ontario
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nextyearfordaboyz wrote: | | I'm hoping we don't use this switch as an excuse to ignore our issues on the offensive side of the ball (namely offensive line). We can add a couple of players, but I also think we might need to roll the dice on some guys like Crawford, Wilber, etc. |
Valid point. Assuming we stay at 18 I think we will have our pick of interior offensive linemen. We may even be able to trade back - remember last year how highly rated DeCastro was and he fell to the Steelers in the mid 20's. I view DT as a need given the switch to the 4-3, and the critical need for our D Line to generate pressure in Kiffin's defense. If it came down to DT vs OG at 18 what do you do? Both are big time needs.
I can't and won't attempt to factor in the myriad of potential free agency moves that could impact our draft selection. _________________ Northland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nextyearfordaboyz 
Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 16250
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Northland wrote: | | Nextyearfordaboyz wrote: | | I'm hoping we don't use this switch as an excuse to ignore our issues on the offensive side of the ball (namely offensive line). We can add a couple of players, but I also think we might need to roll the dice on some guys like Crawford, Wilber, etc. |
Valid point. Assuming we stay at 18 I think we will have our pick of interior offensive linemen. We may even be able to trade back - remember last year how highly rated DeCastro was and he fell to the Steelers in the mid 20's. I view DT as a need given the switch to the 4-3, and the critical need for our D Line to generate pressure in Kiffin's defense. If it came down to DT vs OG at 18 what do you do? Both are big time needs.
I can't and won't attempt to factor in the myriad of potential free agency moves that could impact our draft selection. |
I think it depends on who is there, obviously. I agree completely with the need for a DT, and wouldn't not be opposed at all to drafting one in the first round. I just don't think we can afford to spend pretty much an entire draft helping our team transition to the new defense, like we did in 2005.
I really like Sharrif Floyd and Chance Warmack right now. Probably lean Warmack at this point. Lucky for us, there should be immediate starters at both positions in round 2. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SHSTE92 
Joined: 08 Jan 2006 Posts: 2841
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Revenant04 wrote: | | Question: I really like Bass and Calloway as players that might not start but contribute in the future. Where would they fit in the 4-3, if at all? |
Calloway probably doesn't fit Kiffn's style of attacking DL. He could have a role as a back up though because of his space eating. Worth having a guy like that in the rotation. Ben Bass is probably a better fit but may suffer from the fact all our DEs and NTs are basically 4-3 DTs now minus maybe Crawford.
Ratliff, Lissemore, Hatcher and I hear rumors they like Spears would prob make up your DTs with little room for any more unless they carry 5 DTs. _________________
Me on the sig  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|