| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DirtyDez
Joined: 15 Oct 2010 Posts: 9663 Location: the Arizona desert
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| apollo14000 wrote: | | DirtyDez wrote: | | To be fair to Glennon WV's supporting cast has NFL talent whereas I can name 1 WR for NC State. If they were in opposite roles the production would be different no doubt. |
That's true. Glennon had the most drops of any QB last year. NCST had horrible receivers, especially their TE. That guy is/was awful. |
If we take him it shouldn't be at #7. I don't see who would draft him if he gets past the Jets at #9. _________________
The Rebuild Has Begun... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
apollo14000 
Joined: 07 Jan 2006 Posts: 3749 Location: PA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DirtyDez wrote: | | apollo14000 wrote: | | DirtyDez wrote: | | To be fair to Glennon WV's supporting cast has NFL talent whereas I can name 1 WR for NC State. If they were in opposite roles the production would be different no doubt. |
That's true. Glennon had the most drops of any QB last year. NCST had horrible receivers, especially their TE. That guy is/was awful. |
If we take him it shouldn't be at #7. I don't see who would draft him if he gets past the Jets at #9. |
Oh I absolutely wouldn't be happy with Glennon at #7. I said in my scouting report thread that I'd be thrilled he we took him in the 2nd round. However, I'd be just as happy if we were able to trade back in the 1st (20's or later), draft him there, and accumulate extra picks. That may be an even better scenario. Finding a trade partner is improbably of course. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DirtyDez
Joined: 15 Oct 2010 Posts: 9663 Location: the Arizona desert
|
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
If Warmack is at #7 it would be hard to move back and lose him. Maybe the Jets would wanna jump Buffalo for Wilson and we end up taking Warmack at #9 with an extra 3rd. Dreaming is free.  _________________
The Rebuild Has Begun... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
younggun1273 
Joined: 14 Jan 2007 Posts: 6887 Location: Tallahassee
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
As good as Warmack is, seriously, what is the chance that he goes in the top 10? We thought DeCastro would go top 10 last year as he was one of the best prospects in the whole draft and that didn't happen. A guard hasn't been drafted in the top 10 in decades... _________________
Justo on the sig
Rock Chalk, Jayhawk! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DirtyDez
Joined: 15 Oct 2010 Posts: 9663 Location: the Arizona desert
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| younggun1273 wrote: | | As good as Warmack is, seriously, what is the chance that he goes in the top 10? We thought DeCastro would go top 10 last year as he was one of the best prospects in the whole draft and that didn't happen. A guard hasn't been drafted in the top 10 in decades... |
Months before the draft it's easy to say "lets take Warmack @ #7" but you're probably right. Once the QB's start getting hyped and defenders blow away the athletic drills I think CW could slip.
I'd still take him though. I want our OL to be physical like the Niner's... _________________
The Rebuild Has Begun... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DJ_Fka 
Joined: 13 Jan 2009 Posts: 3298 Location: Brisvegas, Land Down Under
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
3 yards and a cloud of dust, except indoors
that is what i want.
nasty OL, like Kevin Garnett nasty |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
green24 
Joined: 10 Apr 2010 Posts: 26573 Location: #GenoSith
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| khodder wrote: | Been watching a fair amount of video of the past couple of days. I want one name and one name only at QB in this draft, and I think we may have to trade into the back end of the first round to ensure that we do get him.
I don't like Geno is this offense, not near as athletic and many make him out the be. I don't really like the fit of Wilson either. I am not a fan of Glennon, Barkley would be laughable in this offense.
The guy I want is Zac Dysert from Miami (OH) |
Can you please pass on him? He needs to be a Jet. K, thanks.  _________________
JMG and sandwhich on the sigs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DirtyDez
Joined: 15 Oct 2010 Posts: 9663 Location: the Arizona desert
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I like Dysert, he reminds me of Romo. He'll shoot up the boards and go before #38 IMO... The Bills or Jets could even pull a shocker at #8-9. If we want a QB we might have to reach at 7. _________________
The Rebuild Has Begun... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iRobot
Joined: 17 Nov 2011 Posts: 777 Location: Mesa, AZ
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DirtyDez wrote: | | I like Dysert, he reminds me of Romo. He'll shoot up the boards and go before #38 IMO... The Bills or Jets could even pull a shocker at #8-9. If we want a QB we might have to reach at 7. |
If Bruce Arians sees "Ben Roethlisberger" as most comparable NFL player on Dysart.. I wouldn't be shocked to see him get picked by Arizona. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DirtyDez
Joined: 15 Oct 2010 Posts: 9663 Location: the Arizona desert
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| iRobot wrote: | | DirtyDez wrote: | | I like Dysert, he reminds me of Romo. He'll shoot up the boards and go before #38 IMO... The Bills or Jets could even pull a shocker at #8-9. If we want a QB we might have to reach at 7. |
If Bruce Arians sees "Ben Roethlisberger" as most comparable NFL player on Dysart.. I wouldn't be shocked to see him get picked by Arizona. |
Well they're both Redhawks.
Methinks our resident scout should do a writeup on him... _________________
The Rebuild Has Begun... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AZPSquared
Joined: 17 Oct 2012 Posts: 1283
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
How would Nassib fit with Arians? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
khodder 
 Joined: 19 Dec 2005 Posts: 48156 Location: New New York
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| AZPSquared wrote: | | How would Nassib fit with Arians? |
Not all that well right now. Nassib has a downright ugly deep ball. He seems to have one velocity at times too which could be an issue. But with a deep ball like Nassib's his value in an Arians offense drops. _________________ Patrick Peterson - 92 targets, 40 catches allowed, 602 yards, 6 TD's, 7 INT's
The Big Brain am winning again, I am the Greetest. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AZPSquared
Joined: 17 Oct 2012 Posts: 1283
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| khodder wrote: | | AZPSquared wrote: | | How would Nassib fit with Arians? |
Not all that well right now. Nassib has a downright ugly deep ball. He seems to have one velocity at times too which could be an issue. But with a deep ball like Nassib's his value in an Arians offense drops. |
Then it seems to me like Glennon is the best fit for Arians, but no one feels comfortable taking him at #7. If they believe he's the franchise QB, they might have to take him earlier. I do believe that Glennon's stock will rise before the draft. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
khodder 
 Joined: 19 Dec 2005 Posts: 48156 Location: New New York
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| AZPSquared wrote: | | Then it seems to me like Glennon is the best fit for Arians, but no one feels comfortable taking him at #7. If they believe he's the franchise QB, they might have to take him earlier. I do believe that Glennon's stock will rise before the draft. |
I prefer Dysert's deep ball to Glennons right now. _________________ Patrick Peterson - 92 targets, 40 catches allowed, 602 yards, 6 TD's, 7 INT's
The Big Brain am winning again, I am the Greetest. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DJ_Fka 
Joined: 13 Jan 2009 Posts: 3298 Location: Brisvegas, Land Down Under
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I want to see how all QBs interview with the new staff.
Intelligence is going to help alot, above and beyond deep balls etc.
We need to transition quickly to get this team back to the top. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|