| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Who Takes It? |
| 49ers |
|
67% |
[ 36 ] |
| Packers |
|
32% |
[ 17 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 53 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Brettizzle
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 4157
|
 Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:21 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| 49ers Finest wrote: | | Brettizzle wrote: | | neezy007 wrote: | | FG21_PW52 wrote: | | LANiner wrote: | I just laugh when I went to there forum n the general one I don't know if they're kidding or messing around reminds me of the week one matchup never seen a high powered defense like them before team of Destiny all hail rodgers it will be a clear blow out I forget what happened week one 
I don't think this will be Ann easy game for us but winnable yes I just hope cowboy is healthy enough to be a disruptive force o it will be a long day |
Yeah, people aren't giving us any credit because we got blown out incredibly bad 3 weeks ago. Plus, Rodgers and the Pack just played, and they are hot. But so were the Saints. And all Justin really has to do is just play. Just be there. Be a presence, because he already has the respect. |
I like being the underdog. We always stomp our opponents when we are. Accept the Seattle game.  |
Wait, how is SF an underdog? If you can find someone that will give you points take that bet and run with it. I have not seen anywhere that GB is favored, I wouldn't take what sarcastic Packers fans say in the general forum seriously. Everyone knows that SF is the better overall team. |
i know what you mean, but i dont think hes talking bets. hes talking opinion and consensus.
and almost 70% of the public is on the pack for betting (jus sayin doh) |
Oh ok I guess I am hearing very different things but I tend to stay away from forums for the most part lately. It seems the people in the media I listen to are picking SF and I don't blame them. They are way too physical for GBs line to handle and the WRs on GB can't seem to stay healthy. I would say SF by at least 7 points with a late Gb touchdown that doesn't matter. I will root for you guys to take out Sea or Atl though as I don't want them in the Superbowl.
_________________
| El ramster wrote: |
Lmao I know PAckers fans ain't talking.
Back to your dungeon. |
^^^Footballs Future: Where trolling of Packers fans is encouraged |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
J-ALL-DAY
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 15592
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't really see where people are picking SF in the media.
Now, this is only one site, but people on ESPN are picking the Packers as well. I saw the SF/GB preview with the CBS crew, and Marino, Sharpe, Boomer, ect all picked the Packers.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Psychlone
Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 3071
Location: Marin County, CA.
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The only line that really matters is Vegas and they have SF -3. That was the opening as well so money is being placed relatively evenly.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
J-ALL-DAY
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 15592
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Psychlone wrote: | | The only line that really matters is Vegas and they have SF -3. That was the opening as well so money is being placed relatively evenly. |
And you basically get three points for being the home team as it is. So yeah, vegas sees this as an even game, but most of the outsiders have the Packers taking it.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Brettizzle
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 4157
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| J-ALL-DAY wrote: | | Psychlone wrote: | | The only line that really matters is Vegas and they have SF -3. That was the opening as well so money is being placed relatively evenly. |
And you basically get three points for being the home team as it is. So yeah, vegas sees this as an even game, but most of the outsiders have the Packers taking it. |
No Vegas sees it as SF by 3. If this game was on a neutral field it would probably be close to even, but it isn't at a neutral field so SF is favored in THIS game that is happening in SAN FRANCISCO.
_________________
| El ramster wrote: |
Lmao I know PAckers fans ain't talking.
Back to your dungeon. |
^^^Footballs Future: Where trolling of Packers fans is encouraged |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Psychlone
Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 3071
Location: Marin County, CA.
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Brettizzle wrote: | | J-ALL-DAY wrote: | | Psychlone wrote: | | The only line that really matters is Vegas and they have SF -3. That was the opening as well so money is being placed relatively evenly. |
And you basically get three points for being the home team as it is. So yeah, vegas sees this as an even game, but most of the outsiders have the Packers taking it. |
No Vegas sees it as SF by 3. If this game was on a neutral field it would probably be close to even, but it isn't at a neutral field so SF is favored in THIS game that is happening in SAN FRANCISCO. |
 Not seeing the distinction between the posts...
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
49ersfan
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 4605
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| y2lamanaki wrote: | | rudyZ wrote: | | Burial wrote: | I get a vibe that alot of niner fans feel their team is being discredited and is the underdog.. but I dont think thats the case at all.. nor does it seem to be a real opinion outside of a few trolls
I'd say the 49ers are heavily favored to win this |
I think it's a photo-finish, right now. We had the best overall team earlier in the year, but the packers have been heating up late in the year. I don't think there's a clear favorite either way. Any team could win, lose, blow out, implode, etc. I wouldn't want to bet on this game, if I was a gambler. |
I think it'll be close, but this is the match-up I wanted the least. The season just seems set up for a Packers/Seahawks rematch (not saying it's rigged, saying it seems like destiny). |
Last year it seemed like destiny to be Packers/Saints...but SF and NYG messed that plan up....
Speaking on that topic, i have a gut feeling the Texans AND Ravens win. Everyone is expecting Manning vs Brady. Dunno, just a feeling, not that i care either way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iwentundrafted
Joined: 18 Aug 2012
Posts: 2003
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The endzones will be painted red  Been sooooo long since we consistently made the playoffs I actually forgot about this tradition 
_________________
| MAC DRE wrote: | | Kaep will put up numbers but will never win the big game. I just don't see him having a clutch factor in him. He's not even the best QB in his division. Smh |
| Justin Hoover82 wrote: | | Seattle just won the division! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
J-ALL-DAY
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 15592
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Brettizzle wrote: | | No Vegas sees it as SF by 3. If this game was on a neutral field it would probably be close to even, but it isn't at a neutral field so SF is favored in THIS game that is happening in SAN FRANCISCO. |
And that's exactly what I stated. Only reason SF is the favorite by three points is because they are playing at home.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
steadypimpin
Joined: 01 Jan 2009
Posts: 7279
Location: Rockville, Maryland
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| y2lamanaki wrote: | | rudyZ wrote: | | Burial wrote: | I get a vibe that alot of niner fans feel their team is being discredited and is the underdog.. but I dont think thats the case at all.. nor does it seem to be a real opinion outside of a few trolls
I'd say the 49ers are heavily favored to win this |
I think it's a photo-finish, right now. We had the best overall team earlier in the year, but the packers have been heating up late in the year. I don't think there's a clear favorite either way. Any team could win, lose, blow out, implode, etc. I wouldn't want to bet on this game, if I was a gambler. |
I think it'll be close, but this is the match-up I wanted the least. The season just seems set up for a Packers/Seahawks rematch (not saying it's rigged, saying it seems like destiny). |
no you didn't just make me start thinking about this now. Thanks.
_________________
2011 & 2012 NFC West Champs!!! Back to back baby!!!
Xbox: Steadypimpin49
"Keep choppin' wood" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chrissooner49er
Joined: 03 Feb 2005
Posts: 3641
Location: Tulsa, OK
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
People are already putting the 'Hawks past the Falcons? Didn't the 'Hawks have to replace their kicker with the until now out-of-the-NFL Ryan Longwell? And isn't Clemmons, their number one pass rusher, on IR? I think this could really haunt the 'hawks this week end...
_________________
fa·nat·ic (f-ntk)
A person marked or motivated by an extreme, unreasoning enthusiasm, as for a cause.
Fleener: 21 Recs 222yds 86 YAC Walker: 7 Recs 89yds 13YAC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mendeleev
Joined: 07 Aug 2008
Posts: 2897
Location: Ontario
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| J-ALL-DAY wrote: | I don't really see where people are picking SF in the media.
Now, this is only one site, but people on ESPN are picking the Packers as well. I saw the SF/GB preview with the CBS crew, and Marino, Sharpe, Boomer, ect all picked the Packers. |
http://espn.go.com/nfl/picks
Exactly 50/50 for this week.
_________________
 | Uncle Buck wrote: | | Viking fans are VERY happy to see the end of the very successful Favre era, and we gleefully usher in the Rodgers era. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
steadypimpin
Joined: 01 Jan 2009
Posts: 7279
Location: Rockville, Maryland
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Mendeleev wrote: | | J-ALL-DAY wrote: | I don't really see where people are picking SF in the media.
Now, this is only one site, but people on ESPN are picking the Packers as well. I saw the SF/GB preview with the CBS crew, and Marino, Sharpe, Boomer, ect all picked the Packers. |
http://espn.go.com/nfl/picks
Exactly 50/50 for this week. |
Good. I like it when we aren't heavily favored. I think the team gets hungry when they see that stuff. If they look at it, I'm sure they do, who wouldn't want to see what kind of buzz their own team is getting?
_________________
2011 & 2012 NFC West Champs!!! Back to back baby!!!
Xbox: Steadypimpin49
"Keep choppin' wood" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SoCalNiner
Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 18612
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Chrissooner49er wrote: | | People are already putting the 'Hawks past the Falcons? Didn't the 'Hawks have to replace their kicker with the until now out-of-the-NFL Ryan Longwell? And isn't Clemmons, their number one pass rusher, on IR? I think this could really haunt the 'hawks this week end... |
If the Hags win, I'm going to be so pissed.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ataal
Joined: 17 Oct 2011
Posts: 1578
Location: Avondale, Arizona
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think the casual fan thinks that Green Bay is favored in this game. Just not for the reasons some others might think. I think the reason Vegas put it so close is because there are so many unknowns.
Yes, Green Bay has had some injury problems, but they still have Aaron Rodgers. We're starting a quarterback that hasn't even seen a full season, let alone a playoff game. I'm not saying that automatically means he can't do well, but it's an unknown.
We don't just have a lot of guys on our offense injured, they're out for the season. Key players, I might add. On the defensive side, nearly all of our big names are playing with injuries. And, we're the type of team that rarely substitutes players on defense.
If Green Bay scores early and puts us in a hole, it's going to be a very frustrating day for us. I don't have much faith in our play calling to make a big comeback. We absolutely need to keep them in the hole and not switch to a loose zone. Rodgers will carve it up unless his receivers have a huge case of the dropsies.
I'm keeping a hopeful mindset, but I'm the last person to be over-confident. Some say the bye only hurts teams. I might actually agree with that in many cases, but we're just so beat up that we needed that extra time to heal up. Hopefully, it will have been enough. I just wish Manningham, Hunter, and Williams could have benefited from the bye.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
