Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

49ers Sign Billy Cundiff
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> San Francisco 49ers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
FG21_PW52


Joined: 06 Feb 2008
Posts: 4184
Location: 831, CA.
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SoCalNiner wrote:
FG21_PW52 wrote:
SoCalNiner wrote:
FG21_PW52 wrote:
is this the guy the Chargers recently cut because he's anti-clutch in the postseason?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! why would we do this???


No that's Kaeding.


oh, okay. I don't remember Cundiff but I'd really rather just stick it out with Akers. I mean if anything, we should just pooch punt if its that bad...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRHlX_d1baw


oh god no. we really just signed this guy?!?! Mad

Question Question Question Question Question Question Question Question Question Question Question Question Question Question
_________________


janky wrote:
Bridgewater won't be better than Brandon Weeden
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SoCalNiner


Moderator
Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 22668
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FG21_PW52 wrote:
SoCalNiner wrote:
FG21_PW52 wrote:
SoCalNiner wrote:
FG21_PW52 wrote:
is this the guy the Chargers recently cut because he's anti-clutch in the postseason?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! why would we do this???


No that's Kaeding.


oh, okay. I don't remember Cundiff but I'd really rather just stick it out with Akers. I mean if anything, we should just pooch punt if its that bad...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRHlX_d1baw


oh god no. we really just signed this guy?!?! Mad

Question Question Question Question Question Question Question Question Question Question Question Question Question Question


Yup....if it's a kicking competition, Akers should have no problem beating him.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
adamq


Joined: 18 Jan 2007
Posts: 7809
Location: Missouri
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like the signing, at least if it's no longer than 45-50 we don't have to hold our breaths.
_________________

-kiltman

Uncle Buck wrote:
I'd rather have Tebow than any other QB in the NFL besides Rodgers, and I may even take him over Rodgers due to the difference in age.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SoCalNiner


Moderator
Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 22668
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

adamq wrote:
I like the signing, at least if it's no longer than 45-50 we don't have to hold our breaths.


Cundiff has missed multiple 30 yarders this year.....
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
49ersfan


Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 6426
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Special Teams was a main factor in us missing the superbowl last year and the same could hold true this year. Do not trust Ginn, Akers, or Cundiff at all.

Don't really like this signing. Would have preferred Dave Rayner, Neil Rackers, Ryan Longwell, or even John Kasay. Even Nate Kaeding would have been better, his playoff misses were all from 50+ yards. If we were a little more proactive we could have signed Josh Brown from the Bengals a few weeks ago. He's gone 11/12 for the Bengals this year. He signed with them after their original kicker went on IR.

Not really sure why we waited this long and it could really come back to haunt us soon. Of all the positions to hold us back from a superbowl, a freaking kicker Brick wall
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
adamq


Joined: 18 Jan 2007
Posts: 7809
Location: Missouri
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SoCalNiner wrote:
adamq wrote:
I like the signing, at least if it's no longer than 45-50 we don't have to hold our breaths.


Cundiff has missed multiple 30 yarders this year.....


At this point I trust him more than Akers.
_________________

-kiltman

Uncle Buck wrote:
I'd rather have Tebow than any other QB in the NFL besides Rodgers, and I may even take him over Rodgers due to the difference in age.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SoCalNiner


Moderator
Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 22668
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

adamq wrote:
SoCalNiner wrote:
adamq wrote:
I like the signing, at least if it's no longer than 45-50 we don't have to hold our breaths.


Cundiff has missed multiple 30 yarders this year.....


At this point I trust him more than Akers.


I can't trust either one.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cHaInBrEaKeRiii


Joined: 21 Dec 2005
Posts: 4344
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

adamq wrote:
SoCalNiner wrote:
adamq wrote:
I like the signing, at least if it's no longer than 45-50 we don't have to hold our breaths.


Cundiff has missed multiple 30 yarders this year.....


At this point I trust him more than Akers.


Cundiff missed some easy field goals early this season with Washington.

Akers is better IMO
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
clarkfn2284


Joined: 07 Jan 2007
Posts: 3157
Location: Modesto,CA
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

you guys need to calm down.

Harbaugh bought him in to compete. We all know that Harbs likes to have competition. In my opinion Akers will start unless he is hurt or he legitimately looks worse then Cundiff in practice.

They tried out kickers earlier in the year in hopes to kick Akers in the butt. It didnt work, so now they sign one. If he out performs Akers then he earned it just like Akers deserves to lose the job.

IMO Akers ill be the kicker. I think this is about sending a message that Akers clock is ticking
_________________
NextBigThing wrote:
rice wasn't close to do as good as his stats would lead one to assume


okie dokie!!! He only had 1200 rec yards at 40, but he clearly isnt as good as it appears.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rudyZ


Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 13187
Location: Québec
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 11:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Could we possibly have both on the active roster and do some situational kicking... Cundiff on the shorter than 45, Akers on the 45+, or something. I don't know. At this point, I don't want either to handle anything except kickoffs.
_________________


RudyZ's Power Rankings Power Ranking

1) RudyZ's Power Rankings Power Ranking
2) y2's pie Power Rankings (3.1416 rules!)
3) N4L's Poster Power Rankings
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
neezy007


Joined: 21 May 2008
Posts: 9087
Location: El Paso
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who needs a kicker. Just send Kaep out there on 4th down.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rejuvenation


Joined: 20 Sep 2010
Posts: 1740
Location: Delaware
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did Jim not pay attention to what happened when Cundiff was kicking for his brother last year in the AFC Championship game?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sbrown


Joined: 30 Dec 2005
Posts: 9215
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SoCalNiner wrote:
https://twitter.com/mattbarrows/status/286241023523450882

Barrows wrote:
Heard Justin Medlock went 21-22 on FG attempts during his #49ers tryout today with one off the upright. Billy Cundiff? ...


https://twitter.com/mattbarrows/status/286241168675729408

Barrows wrote:
... He had two bonk off the upright, but both went in. He was 22-22 and also distinguished himself on kickoffs.


how did cundiff get the job if medlock looked that good? and I agree nate keading would have been a better look
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
P-Willy52


Joined: 22 Dec 2008
Posts: 693
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sbrown wrote:
SoCalNiner wrote:
https://twitter.com/mattbarrows/status/286241023523450882

Barrows wrote:
Heard Justin Medlock went 21-22 on FG attempts during his #49ers tryout today with one off the upright. Billy Cundiff? ...


https://twitter.com/mattbarrows/status/286241168675729408

Barrows wrote:
... He had two bonk off the upright, but both went in. He was 22-22 and also distinguished himself on kickoffs.


how did cundiff get the job if medlock looked that good? and I agree nate keading would have been a better look


what are you failing to comprehend?? medlock missed one cundiff didnt while looking better on kick offs...i think everyone is over-reacting, and hopefully were not even in a position where the kicker matters.
_________________

1-0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
y2lamanaki


Moderator
FF Fanatic
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 9757
Location: Lancaster, PA
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

clarkfn2284 wrote:
you guys need to calm down...


People said the same thing after we signed Brandon Jacobs and others went overboard. Sometimes, signings are just bad.
_________________


Frank Gore 10,000 yard tracker:

Currently - 9,967
Ranked 29th all-time
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> San Francisco 49ers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 2 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group