| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
CleBrowns07
Joined: 12 Dec 2006
Posts: 4165
Location: Willoughby
|
 Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:00 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Entropy wrote: | | CleBrowns07 wrote: | | Luck brought a 2-14 team to an 11-5 record and to the playoffs. Weeden brought a 4-12 team 1 more win. I don't see what else there is to discuss. |
Luck didn't carry the team, the team carried Luck. If you don't believe that, then explain how they won 11 games when Luck had 23 turnovers and only 28 TDs. |
So explain why that team won 9 less games last year? Quit acting like Luck played no part in the turnaround.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thomas5737
Joined: 23 Dec 2009
Posts: 1844
Location: WV
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| They both underachieved. Luck was better at winning games, he led a lot of comebacks. Statistically they are close. Eye test isn't all that far off either until the game is on the line. If Weeden would have played great down the stretch of games and won 4 that we lost this would be a better argument. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tom Shean
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 4571
Location: Tha 703
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quote: | | Let's be real here, ok? Weeden is a rookie. He played on an offense where almost ALL of his skill players were rookies and a 2nd year guy. He was playing in a complicated offense that has taken "elite" QBs years to learn. |
You misspelled "Luck"
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HADEN4PREZIDENT
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 419
Location: Ohio
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tom Shean wrote: | | Quote: | | Let's be real here, ok? Weeden is a rookie. He played on an offense where almost ALL of his skill players were rookies and a 2nd year guy. He was playing in a complicated offense that has taken "elite" QBs years to learn. |
You misspelled "Luck" |
Wayne is a big upgrade over Browns targets but I'm still on your side obviously.
_________________
^^^Jamison^^^ Browns Weeden+Richardson+ Gordon+Little= Offense in Cleveland? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Entropy
Joined: 16 Jul 2012
Posts: 1903
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| HADEN4PREZIDENT wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: |
And I almost guarantee that less than 5% would say Weeden played better.
Don't cop out because someone might say
ziomg Luck >>>>>>>>>>> Weeden
[inappropriate/removed] it, i'm making the thread.
O give me the damn soap |
If 95% of people say "Luck >>>>>>>>>>> Weeden" it's still just using inequality symbols.
What if I use 4 more or 6 less inequality symbols? Did I disagree with you? And if so, by how much? What criteria did I use?
Do I add more to the discussion by using these symbols?
If you would like to discuss actual points, I'd love that. |
Just a simple question can you give a defining moment this season where Weeden led or willed this team to victory? Avoid saying that one dropped ball cost him games. I can name one time against Dallas he faced adversity and gave us a chance to win but we fell short without Joe in the secondary. Luck won multiple games for his team leading them to victory showing us how clutch he was in close games. |
Weeden led his team to victory in the 1st game against Cincy, but the defense led us to defeat. Something Luck didn't encounter.
Weeden led us to victory in the 2nd Cincy game.
Weeden led us to victory against the Colts, but the defense couldn't contain the QB on the goal line twice.
Weeden led us to victory against the Bolts, thanks to the defense not caving again.
Weeden led us to victory against Dallas, but the defense and refs blew it.
Weeden led us to victory against the Steelers.
Weeden led us to victory against the Chiefs.
Now, show me when Luck won games without his defense getting him the ball late so he had a chance to overcome his poor playing earlier in the game.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dropkick_pride
Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Posts: 9438
Location: C-bus
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tom Shean wrote: | | Quote: | | Let's be real here, ok? Weeden is a rookie. He played on an offense where almost ALL of his skill players were rookies and a 2nd year guy. He was playing in a complicated offense that has taken "elite" QBs years to learn. |
You misspelled "Luck" |
Sorry, I have zero idea as to why this is even a discussion. Haha
_________________
| Thomas5737 wrote: | | EZ's acceptance of farting on nuns does not necessarily reflect the views of this sub forum. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Entropy
Joined: 16 Jul 2012
Posts: 1903
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| CleBrowns07 wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | CleBrowns07 wrote: | | Luck brought a 2-14 team to an 11-5 record and to the playoffs. Weeden brought a 4-12 team 1 more win. I don't see what else there is to discuss. |
Luck didn't carry the team, the team carried Luck. If you don't believe that, then explain how they won 11 games when Luck had 23 turnovers and only 28 TDs. |
So explain why that team won 9 less games last year? Quit acting like Luck played no part in the turnaround. |
Luck did play a part. He was the guy that actually threw the passes that receivers caught at the end of games. It's just that he was playing poorly in those games before the end.
We didn’t get those opportunities to correct mistakes OUR QB made as much NOR did we have a defense that didn’t lose games all by themselves.
Last year, the Colts has 3 QBs that should not have even been in the NFL. THAT is why they did so poorly.
Luck clearly belongs in the NFL...so in comparison to what they has last year, it's a huge improvement IN THE QB POSITION.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Entropy
Joined: 16 Jul 2012
Posts: 1903
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dropkick_pride wrote: | | Tom Shean wrote: | | Quote: | | Let's be real here, ok? Weeden is a rookie. He played on an offense where almost ALL of his skill players were rookies and a 2nd year guy. He was playing in a complicated offense that has taken "elite" QBs years to learn. |
You misspelled "Luck" |
Sorry, I have zero idea as to why this is even a discussion. Haha |
Yet you're reading it? And responding?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dropkick_pride
Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Posts: 9438
Location: C-bus
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Entropy wrote: | | CleBrowns07 wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | CleBrowns07 wrote: | | Luck brought a 2-14 team to an 11-5 record and to the playoffs. Weeden brought a 4-12 team 1 more win. I don't see what else there is to discuss. |
Luck didn't carry the team, the team carried Luck. If you don't believe that, then explain how they won 11 games when Luck had 23 turnovers and only 28 TDs. |
So explain why that team won 9 less games last year? Quit acting like Luck played no part in the turnaround. |
Luck did play a part. He was the guy that actually threw the passes that receivers caught at the end of games. It's just that he was playing poorly in those games before the end.
We didn’t get those opportunities to correct mistakes OUR QB made as much NOR did we have a defense that didn’t lose games all by themselves.
Last year, the Colts has 3 QBs that should not have even been in the NFL. THAT is why they did so poorly.
Luck clearly belongs in the NFL...so in comparison to what they has last year, it's a huge improvement IN THE QB POSITION. |
Gee, that sounds familiar...
_________________
| Thomas5737 wrote: | | EZ's acceptance of farting on nuns does not necessarily reflect the views of this sub forum. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Entropy
Joined: 16 Jul 2012
Posts: 1903
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tom Shean wrote: | | Quote: | | Let's be real here, ok? Weeden is a rookie. He played on an offense where almost ALL of his skill players were rookies and a 2nd year guy. He was playing in a complicated offense that has taken "elite" QBs years to learn. |
You misspelled "Luck" |
No I said Weeden Tom.
Luck didn't have a rookie WR, a rookie RB, and a 2nd year WR as his top 3 targets, did he?
Hey Tom, how much NFL experience did Luck's top 3 targets have? How many were All Pros?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Entropy
Joined: 16 Jul 2012
Posts: 1903
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dropkick_pride wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | CleBrowns07 wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | CleBrowns07 wrote: | | Luck brought a 2-14 team to an 11-5 record and to the playoffs. Weeden brought a 4-12 team 1 more win. I don't see what else there is to discuss. |
Luck didn't carry the team, the team carried Luck. If you don't believe that, then explain how they won 11 games when Luck had 23 turnovers and only 28 TDs. |
So explain why that team won 9 less games last year? Quit acting like Luck played no part in the turnaround. |
Luck did play a part. He was the guy that actually threw the passes that receivers caught at the end of games. It's just that he was playing poorly in those games before the end.
We didn’t get those opportunities to correct mistakes OUR QB made as much NOR did we have a defense that didn’t lose games all by themselves.
Last year, the Colts has 3 QBs that should not have even been in the NFL. THAT is why they did so poorly.
Luck clearly belongs in the NFL...so in comparison to what they has last year, it's a huge improvement IN THE QB POSITION. |
Gee, that sounds familiar... |
Don't it though?
It seems Browns fans should have no trouble understanding how the QB can single-handedly ruin a season.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CleBrowns07
Joined: 12 Dec 2006
Posts: 4165
Location: Willoughby
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Entropy wrote: | | HADEN4PREZIDENT wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: |
And I almost guarantee that less than 5% would say Weeden played better.
Don't cop out because someone might say
ziomg Luck >>>>>>>>>>> Weeden
[inappropriate/removed] it, i'm making the thread.
O give me the damn soap |
If 95% of people say "Luck >>>>>>>>>>> Weeden" it's still just using inequality symbols.
What if I use 4 more or 6 less inequality symbols? Did I disagree with you? And if so, by how much? What criteria did I use?
Do I add more to the discussion by using these symbols?
If you would like to discuss actual points, I'd love that. |
Just a simple question can you give a defining moment this season where Weeden led or willed this team to victory? Avoid saying that one dropped ball cost him games. I can name one time against Dallas he faced adversity and gave us a chance to win but we fell short without Joe in the secondary. Luck won multiple games for his team leading them to victory showing us how clutch he was in close games. |
Weeden led his team to victory in the 1st game against Cincy, but the defense led us to defeat. Something Luck didn't encounter.
Weeden led us to victory in the 2nd Cincy game.
Weeden led us to victory against the Colts, but the defense couldn't contain the QB on the goal line twice.
Weeden led us to victory against the Bolts, thanks to the defense not caving again.
Weeden led us to victory against Dallas, but the defense and refs blew it.
Weeden led us to victory against the Steelers.
Weeden led us to victory against the Chiefs.
Now, show me when Luck won games without his defense getting him the ball late so he had a chance to overcome his poor playing earlier in the game. |
Luck beat us that game. He played very well and Weeden couldn't match.
Weeden did not win us SD or Pitt. Those were on the defense. We scored 1 TD against San Diego and it was TRich. Our defense had 8 FRICKEN TURNOVERS against Pittsburgh and Weeden only mustered 20 points. How exactly were those victories lead by him?
KC and Oakland are terrible so I don't want to hear that. Cinci I'll give you.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HADEN4PREZIDENT
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 419
Location: Ohio
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Entropy wrote: | | HADEN4PREZIDENT wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: |
And I almost guarantee that less than 5% would say Weeden played better.
Don't cop out because someone might say
ziomg Luck >>>>>>>>>>> Weeden
[inappropriate/removed] it, i'm making the thread.
O give me the damn soap |
If 95% of people say "Luck >>>>>>>>>>> Weeden" it's still just using inequality symbols.
What if I use 4 more or 6 less inequality symbols? Did I disagree with you? And if so, by how much? What criteria did I use?
Do I add more to the discussion by using these symbols?
If you would like to discuss actual points, I'd love that. |
Just a simple question can you give a defining moment this season where Weeden led or willed this team to victory? Avoid saying that one dropped ball cost him games. I can name one time against Dallas he faced adversity and gave us a chance to win but we fell short without Joe in the secondary. Luck won multiple games for his team leading them to victory showing us how clutch he was in close games. |
Weeden led his team to victory in the 1st game against Cincy, but the defense led us to defeat. Something Luck didn't encounter. Maybe his most impressive game.
Weeden led us to victory in the 2nd Cincy game.
Weeden led us to victory against the Colts, but the defense couldn't contain the QB on the goal line twice.
Weeden led us to victory against the Bolts, thanks to the defense not caving again.
Weeden led us to victory against Dallas, but the defense and refs blew it.
Weeden led us to victory against the Steelers.
Weeden led us to victory against the Chiefs.
Now, show me when Luck won games without his defense getting him the ball late so he had a chance to overcome his poor playing earlier in the game. |
First Cincy Game he was impressive but still wasn't enough to win.
Second Cincy Game was also good.
Indy game were unable to finish drives and Lucks athleticism is underrated.
SD game 11-27 158yds is not good QB play and we did not win because of him.
Dallas game we had a big lead and were unable to score until are backs against the wall concerns me.
KC is KC he played decent against a poor team but did not throw for a TD.
OAK game threw two costly picks but did throw the ball well.
My problem is in the NFL game comes to down to the very end and Luck showed that he can put together GW drives and carry his team on multiple occasions. I'm not giving up on Weeden in fact I would love to see him in Chip Kelly's offense in the no huddle like he had in Ok St but to say he had as good a season as Luck is wrong all you have to do is look at that records.
_________________
^^^Jamison^^^ Browns Weeden+Richardson+ Gordon+Little= Offense in Cleveland? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Entropy
Joined: 16 Jul 2012
Posts: 1903
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| CleBrowns07 wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | HADEN4PREZIDENT wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: |
And I almost guarantee that less than 5% would say Weeden played better.
Don't cop out because someone might say
ziomg Luck >>>>>>>>>>> Weeden
[inappropriate/removed] it, i'm making the thread.
O give me the damn soap |
If 95% of people say "Luck >>>>>>>>>>> Weeden" it's still just using inequality symbols.
What if I use 4 more or 6 less inequality symbols? Did I disagree with you? And if so, by how much? What criteria did I use?
Do I add more to the discussion by using these symbols?
If you would like to discuss actual points, I'd love that. |
Just a simple question can you give a defining moment this season where Weeden led or willed this team to victory? Avoid saying that one dropped ball cost him games. I can name one time against Dallas he faced adversity and gave us a chance to win but we fell short without Joe in the secondary. Luck won multiple games for his team leading them to victory showing us how clutch he was in close games. |
Weeden led his team to victory in the 1st game against Cincy, but the defense led us to defeat. Something Luck didn't encounter.
Weeden led us to victory in the 2nd Cincy game.
Weeden led us to victory against the Colts, but the defense couldn't contain the QB on the goal line twice.
Weeden led us to victory against the Bolts, thanks to the defense not caving again.
Weeden led us to victory against Dallas, but the defense and refs blew it.
Weeden led us to victory against the Steelers.
Weeden led us to victory against the Chiefs.
Now, show me when Luck won games without his defense getting him the ball late so he had a chance to overcome his poor playing earlier in the game. |
Luck beat us that game. He played very well and Weeden couldn't match.
Weeden did not win us SD or Pitt. Those were on the defense. We scored 1 TD against San Diego and it was TRich. Our defense had 8 FRICKEN TURNOVERS against Pittsburgh and Weeden only mustered 20 points. How exactly were those victories lead by him?
KC and Oakland are terrible so I don't want to hear that. Cinci I'll give you. |
Luck didn't beat us, our defense beat us. Weeden was a better passer that game.
Oh, so the defense can win games by getting TOs? Hmmm, can we use that same excuse for Luck?
And now a player who is NOT the QB gets the credit for the win because he made an amazing play? I think a few of Luck's receivers did the same thing, yet you credit Luck for it.
You can't just throw out KC and Oakland unless you throw out the poor teams Luck won against too.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nugpimpen
Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 12073
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Entropy wrote: | | CleBrowns07 wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | HADEN4PREZIDENT wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: |
And I almost guarantee that less than 5% would say Weeden played better.
Don't cop out because someone might say
ziomg Luck >>>>>>>>>>> Weeden
[inappropriate/removed] it, i'm making the thread.
O give me the damn soap |
If 95% of people say "Luck >>>>>>>>>>> Weeden" it's still just using inequality symbols.
What if I use 4 more or 6 less inequality symbols? Did I disagree with you? And if so, by how much? What criteria did I use?
Do I add more to the discussion by using these symbols?
If you would like to discuss actual points, I'd love that. |
Just a simple question can you give a defining moment this season where Weeden led or willed this team to victory? Avoid saying that one dropped ball cost him games. I can name one time against Dallas he faced adversity and gave us a chance to win but we fell short without Joe in the secondary. Luck won multiple games for his team leading them to victory showing us how clutch he was in close games. |
Weeden led his team to victory in the 1st game against Cincy, but the defense led us to defeat. Something Luck didn't encounter.
Weeden led us to victory in the 2nd Cincy game.
Weeden led us to victory against the Colts, but the defense couldn't contain the QB on the goal line twice.
Weeden led us to victory against the Bolts, thanks to the defense not caving again.
Weeden led us to victory against Dallas, but the defense and refs blew it.
Weeden led us to victory against the Steelers.
Weeden led us to victory against the Chiefs.
Now, show me when Luck won games without his defense getting him the ball late so he had a chance to overcome his poor playing earlier in the game. |
Luck beat us that game. He played very well and Weeden couldn't match.
Weeden did not win us SD or Pitt. Those were on the defense. We scored 1 TD against San Diego and it was TRich. Our defense had 8 FRICKEN TURNOVERS against Pittsburgh and Weeden only mustered 20 points. How exactly were those victories lead by him?
KC and Oakland are terrible so I don't want to hear that. Cinci I'll give you. |
Luck didn't beat us, our defense beat us. Weeden was a better passer that game.
Oh, so the defense can win games by getting TOs? Hmmm, can we use that same excuse for Luck?
And now a player who is NOT the QB gets the credit for the win because he made an amazing play? I think a few of Luck's receivers did the same thing, yet you credit Luck for it.
You can't just throw out KC and Oakland unless you throw out the poor teams Luck won against too. |
Was Weeden the better Passer that day against the Colts?? Maybe
Was he the better QB? No
Colts won because Gordon dropped a pass in the sun and because Luck did this thing that Weeden can't do. Score TD's with his legs
_________________
| hornbybrown wrote: | | We also have the highest amount per capita of Jedi in New Zealand. I'm one. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
