| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Entropy 
Joined: 16 Jul 2012 Posts: 1909
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| duke2056 wrote: |
This is maybe the stupidest argument ever. Anyone who has to debate whether Weeden or Luck was better this season needs not only an eye exam, but some antipsychotic meds. |
You're being rude duke.
This isn't even a point, it's simply a ridiculous opinion. If what you said were really true, then it would be very easy to show how the two QBs aren't comparable. But it's not, which is precisely my point. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nugpimpen 
Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Posts: 12166 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Andrew Luck >>>>>>>>>>>> Weeden _________________
| hornbybrown wrote: | | We also have the highest amount per capita of Jedi in New Zealand. I'm one. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Entropy 
Joined: 16 Jul 2012 Posts: 1909
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nugpimpen wrote: | | Andrew Luck >>>>>>>>>>>> Weeden |
Not with completion percentage, overthrows and underthrows, INT%, YPA, and QB rating. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nugpimpen 
Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Posts: 12166 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Andrew Luck >>>>>>>>>>>> Weeden |
Not with completion percentage, overthrows and underthrows, INT%, YPA, and QB rating. |
o lawd
Take this into the comparisons forum and see how the people feel. _________________
| hornbybrown wrote: | | We also have the highest amount per capita of Jedi in New Zealand. I'm one. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CleBrowns07 
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Posts: 4172 Location: Willoughby
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Andrew Luck >>>>>>>>>>>> Weeden |
Not with completion percentage, overthrows and underthrows, INT%, YPA, and QB rating. |
wait...really? So if the Colts offered Luck straight up for Weeden you would turn it down? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Entropy 
Joined: 16 Jul 2012 Posts: 1909
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nugpimpen wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Andrew Luck >>>>>>>>>>>> Weeden |
Not with completion percentage, overthrows and underthrows, INT%, YPA, and QB rating. |
o lawd
Take this into the comparisons forum and see how the people feel. |
HAHA...yeah so they can argue the facts with inequality symbols. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Entropy 
Joined: 16 Jul 2012 Posts: 1909
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| CleBrowns07 wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Andrew Luck >>>>>>>>>>>> Weeden |
Not with completion percentage, overthrows and underthrows, INT%, YPA, and QB rating. |
wait...really? So if the Colts offered Luck straight up for Weeden you would turn it down? |
How does that make his completion percentage better? Or any of the other things? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nugpimpen 
Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Posts: 12166 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Andrew Luck >>>>>>>>>>>> Weeden |
Not with completion percentage, overthrows and underthrows, INT%, YPA, and QB rating. |
o lawd
Take this into the comparisons forum and see how the people feel. |
HAHA...yeah so they can argue the facts with inequality symbols. |
This is a great example of stats not telling the whole story.
I am a big Weeden fan, but Luck is most certainly better.
We have a better roster than the Colts. Ya, Shurmur is a big reason for us sucking, but Weeden didn't help out much.
That team is going to the playoffs for the sole reason of Andrew Luck.
The eye test, it wins out. _________________
| hornbybrown wrote: | | We also have the highest amount per capita of Jedi in New Zealand. I'm one. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nugpimpen 
Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Posts: 12166 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nugpimpen wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Andrew Luck >>>>>>>>>>>> Weeden |
Not with completion percentage, overthrows and underthrows, INT%, YPA, and QB rating. |
o lawd
Take this into the comparisons forum and see how the people feel. |
HAHA...yeah so they can argue the facts with inequality symbols. |
This is a great example of stats not telling the whole story.
I am a big Weeden fan, but Luck is most certainly better.
We have a better roster than the Colts. Ya, Shurmur is a big reason for us sucking, but Weeden didn't help out much.
That team is going to the playoffs for the sole reason of Andrew Luck.
The eye test, it wins out. |
And I almost guarantee that less than 5% would say Weeden played better.
Don't cop out because someone might say
ziomg Luck >>>>>>>>>>> Weeden
[inappropriate/removed] it, i'm making the thread.
O give me the damn soap _________________
| hornbybrown wrote: | | We also have the highest amount per capita of Jedi in New Zealand. I'm one. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CleBrowns07 
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Posts: 4172 Location: Willoughby
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Entropy wrote: | | CleBrowns07 wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Andrew Luck >>>>>>>>>>>> Weeden |
Not with completion percentage, overthrows and underthrows, INT%, YPA, and QB rating. |
wait...really? So if the Colts offered Luck straight up for Weeden you would turn it down? |
How does that make his completion percentage better? Or any of the other things? |
Don't answer the question with another question. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Entropy 
Joined: 16 Jul 2012 Posts: 1909
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nugpimpen wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Andrew Luck >>>>>>>>>>>> Weeden |
Not with completion percentage, overthrows and underthrows, INT%, YPA, and QB rating. |
o lawd
Take this into the comparisons forum and see how the people feel. |
HAHA...yeah so they can argue the facts with inequality symbols. |
This is a great example of stats not telling the whole story.
I am a big Weeden fan, but Luck is most certainly better.
We have a better roster than the Colts. Ya, Shurmur is a big reason for us sucking, but Weeden didn't help out much.
That team is going to the playoffs for the sole reason of Andrew Luck.
The eye test, it wins out. |
You're right, Luck is a better talent. And stats don't tell the whole story. But Luck did not play well this year. Both the "eye test" AND the stats say that.
The sole reason (if there really is a "sole reason") they are going to the playoffs was that their defense was able to overcome Luck's 23 turnovers to give the offense a chance to overcome Luck's errors.
Luck may be great, but he played poorly this year.
| CleBrowns07 wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | CleBrowns07 wrote: | | Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Andrew Luck >>>>>>>>>>>> Weeden |
Not with completion percentage, overthrows and underthrows, INT%, YPA, and QB rating. |
wait...really? So if the Colts offered Luck straight up for Weeden you would turn it down? |
How does that make his completion percentage better? Or any of the other things? |
Don't answer the question with another question. |
I was showing how the answer to your question is not relevant to the issue. Luck played poorly. Weeden played poorly. _________________

Last edited by Entropy on Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:01 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Entropy 
Joined: 16 Jul 2012 Posts: 1909
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nugpimpen wrote: |
And I almost guarantee that less than 5% would say Weeden played better.
Don't cop out because someone might say
ziomg Luck >>>>>>>>>>> Weeden
[inappropriate/removed] it, i'm making the thread.
O give me the damn soap |
If 95% of people say "Luck >>>>>>>>>>> Weeden" it's still just using inequality symbols.
What if I use 4 more or 6 less inequality symbols? Did I disagree with you? And if so, by how much? What criteria did I use?
Do I add more to the discussion by using these symbols?
If you would like to discuss actual points, I'd love that. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CleBrowns07 
Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Posts: 4172 Location: Willoughby
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Luck brought a 2-14 team to an 11-5 record and to the playoffs. Weeden brought a 4-12 team 1 more win. I don't see what else there is to discuss. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Entropy 
Joined: 16 Jul 2012 Posts: 1909
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| CleBrowns07 wrote: | | Luck brought a 2-14 team to an 11-5 record and to the playoffs. Weeden brought a 4-12 team 1 more win. I don't see what else there is to discuss. |
Luck didn't carry the team, the team carried Luck. If you don't believe that, then explain how they won 11 games when Luck had 23 turnovers and only 28 TDs. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HADEN4PREZIDENT
Joined: 31 Oct 2011 Posts: 419 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Entropy wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: |
And I almost guarantee that less than 5% would say Weeden played better.
Don't cop out because someone might say
ziomg Luck >>>>>>>>>>> Weeden
[inappropriate/removed] it, i'm making the thread.
O give me the damn soap |
If 95% of people say "Luck >>>>>>>>>>> Weeden" it's still just using inequality symbols.
What if I use 4 more or 6 less inequality symbols? Did I disagree with you? And if so, by how much? What criteria did I use?
Do I add more to the discussion by using these symbols?
If you would like to discuss actual points, I'd love that. |
Just a simple question can you give a defining moment this season where Weeden led or willed this team to victory? Avoid saying that one dropped ball cost him games. I can name one time against Dallas he faced adversity and gave us a chance to win but we fell short without Joe in the secondary. Luck won multiple games for his team leading them to victory showing us how clutch he was in close games. _________________
^^^Jamison^^^ Browns Weeden+Richardson+ Gordon+Little= Offense in Cleveland? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|