| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
iRobot
Joined: 17 Nov 2011
Posts: 775
Location: Mesa, AZ
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 12:54 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| stchamp98 wrote: | Chicago has a QB but with no head coach there, it'd be impossible to predict whether or not Turner would get consideration there. The Bears reportedly want an offensive minded coach too, in which case Turner may not have say in the offensive decisions making.
It's a good point. Every team needing an offensive coordinator has no QB to speak of. LOL, except for San Diego but I don't see Norv as a candidate there.... |
I wonder if Cutler sticks around, requests out, or just finished out the year left and leaves. Not saying I'd love him here but he's better than QB's on the roster not named Kolb (and arguably even better than Kolb) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AZPSquared
Joined: 17 Oct 2012
Posts: 1283
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Turner wont get a HC job |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stchamp98
Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 52947
Location: Havre, Montana
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| AZPSquared wrote: | | Turner wont get a HC job |
I think we're all well aware of that. We're talking vacant offensive coordinator jobs.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AZPSquared
Joined: 17 Oct 2012
Posts: 1283
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| stchamp98 wrote: | | AZPSquared wrote: | | DDOCKETT90 wrote: | | AZPSquared wrote: | | iRobot wrote: | Best case scenario to me is Horton HC, Keim GM, and someone like Norv Turner for OC.
But, at this point, I would take any staff improvement that can take full advantage of the talent on both sides of the ball and get us back into the playoffs. |
Turner want to go somewhere where he knows people and somewhere with a QB. Thats not AZ. |
There are no teams with qbs  |
What do mean? There are plenty of teams with QB's. Turner is interested in Dallas |
I linked it a few pages back, Garrett said today he will NOT give up the offensive playcalling responsibilities. |
things might change...Jerry Jones might change them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DirtyDez
Joined: 15 Oct 2010
Posts: 9658
Location: the Arizona desert
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| iRobot wrote: | | stchamp98 wrote: | Chicago has a QB but with no head coach there, it'd be impossible to predict whether or not Turner would get consideration there. The Bears reportedly want an offensive minded coach too, in which case Turner may not have say in the offensive decisions making.
It's a good point. Every team needing an offensive coordinator has no QB to speak of. LOL, except for San Diego but I don't see Norv as a candidate there.... |
I wonder if Cutler sticks around, requests out, or just finished out the year left and leaves. Not saying I'd love him here but he's better than QB's on the roster not named Kolb (and arguably even better than Kolb) |
Not even sure I'd give up #7 for Cutler. Seems like everyone on the Bears hates him. 
_________________
The Rebuild Has Begun... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stchamp98
Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 52947
Location: Havre, Montana
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| AZPSquared wrote: | | stchamp98 wrote: | | AZPSquared wrote: | | DDOCKETT90 wrote: | | AZPSquared wrote: | | iRobot wrote: | Best case scenario to me is Horton HC, Keim GM, and someone like Norv Turner for OC.
But, at this point, I would take any staff improvement that can take full advantage of the talent on both sides of the ball and get us back into the playoffs. |
Turner want to go somewhere where he knows people and somewhere with a QB. Thats not AZ. |
There are no teams with qbs |
What do mean? There are plenty of teams with QB's. Turner is interested in Dallas |
I linked it a few pages back, Garrett said today he will NOT give up the offensive playcalling responsibilities. |
things might change...Jerry Jones might change them. |
He already said he's sticking with Garrett in all capacities. Presser last night. Dallas forum has numerous links.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DJ_Fka
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 3289
Location: Brisvegas, Land Down Under
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I would give a 2nd for him
But why would the bears give him up? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
apollo14000
Joined: 07 Jan 2006
Posts: 3749
Location: PA
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DJ_Fka wrote: | I would give a 2nd for him
But why would the bears give him up? |
Yeah that's what I'm thinking. That Cutler to Marshall connection has always been lethal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DJ_Fka
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 3289
Location: Brisvegas, Land Down Under
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
They won 10 games with him
Why get rid of him?
That is more than Romo, Big Ben and manning jnr |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
babyatemydingo
Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 5913
Location: South Jersey
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| AZCardinalsFan wrote: | | Vick would be an upgrade of what we have right now. But it honestly isnt that hard to do. |
^The best comment in the thread.^
Don't waste your time.
Tallest midget in the circus. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
x0x
Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Posts: 13906
Location: Oh Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| stchamp98 wrote: | | Bottom line, Kolb or Vick, we're sitting in the same spot today as either guy's performance would have gotten Ken Whisenhunt fired. If you want to say that's an "I told you so" type deal I guess you can but I can't say with a straight face that I would. |
I doubt this as we would have had a 2nd round pick and DRC still on the team.
Not to mention Vick in 2010 would have got us better than 5-11 and probably better than 8-8 last season.
I doubt Whiz would be fired right now but yes, we'd still be searching for a QB in 2013. Just not as much crud the last three seasons.
I also suggested we get Tebow and frankly the guy would be able to at least take the hits unlike our feature glass QBs.
_________________
Legends Never Die. They Breathe Through The New Generation.
100 Greatest Quarterbacks of All Time |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stchamp98
Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 52947
Location: Havre, Montana
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| x0x wrote: | | stchamp98 wrote: | | Bottom line, Kolb or Vick, we're sitting in the same spot today as either guy's performance would have gotten Ken Whisenhunt fired. If you want to say that's an "I told you so" type deal I guess you can but I can't say with a straight face that I would. |
I doubt this as we would have had a 2nd round pick and DRC still on the team.
Not to mention Vick in 2010 would have got us better than 5-11 and probably better than 8-8 last season.
I doubt Whiz would be fired right now but yes, we'd still be searching for a QB in 2013. Just not as much crud the last three seasons.
I also suggested we get Tebow and frankly the guy would be able to at least take the hits unlike our feature glass QBs. |
1. 2nd round pick I can't argue, we definitely missed that but DRC wasn't missed 1 bit. He was in a system tailored to him in Philly and was miserable this year. Philly media calls him "DRC: DoesNotCare". I swear, I have links to it. He's a non-factor in this.
2. How would Vick have gotten us better than 8-8 last year? He had a pedestrian QB rating, a touchdown to turnover ratio of 1:1 and missed 3 games due to injury. The Eagles finished 8-8, same as us and that included a loss at home to the John Skelton led Arizona Cardinals.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
