| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SaveourSonics
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45445
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:51 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| mike23md wrote: | | SaveourSonics wrote: | His jersey # is 3, which is why they call him RW3 (though no one really calls him that, his real nickname is DangeRuss Wilson).
Just to clue you guys in on something you apparently didn't know.
Carry on. |
Do you think I couldnt figure that one out? That was pretty obvious. I was merely pointing out that its kinda cute that DangePuss Wilson has a nickname that is similar to big brother RGIII. haha!   |
Did you want my serious answer on that question?
_________________
 '
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheDudeAbides
Joined: 19 Jan 2011
Posts: 370
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I call him Skee-lo, but no one seems to care about 90's hip-hop references, so DangerRuss it is... bleh.
I'm looking forward to one specific piece of this puzzle, and that's which team can more effectively shut down the other's read-option (bearing in mind that it makes up more of Washington's offense than it does Seattle's). I think you need a speedy defense with disciplined DEs and DBs who can jam guys at the line and still cover them man to man. I see Seattle's ability to do that being stronger than Washington's - and the Hawks have a more diverse offense outside of that set of plays.
Even if both teams shut it down equally... I'd have to say it's going to be Skee-lo versus a pretty suspect secondary pitted against Morris (stud, btw - should be getting a ton more ROY talk than he has) and a solid-but-not-so-elite-as-we-thought Seattle run D.
I like the matchup, even though I think the Skins are the toughest potential matchup for us in the playoffs. Other than TV jamming us up with 10am (Pacific) games on the East Coast, that is. Fortunately, this is a 1PM start time for us, so those road-woes y'all are resting your hopes upon are not so clear (Seattle played two non-10am road games this year... one was a Thursday night game which is a joke for the visiting team, pretty much always, and a 50-burger we dropped in Toronto against the Bills).
Here's to a hard-fought, hard-hitting game with no significant injuries on either side - let's get out of there healthy and without Pete running up the score *too* badly. I like the Skins despite their coach being one of our long-time rivals from back in the days of the AFC West...
Hawks 49, Skins 13.
Go Hawks!
_________________
TommyC376 on the Sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
turtle28
Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 53124
Location: MD/DC/VA depends on the hr!
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TheDudeAbides wrote: | I call him Skee-lo, but no one seems to care about 90's hip-hop references, so DangerRuss it is... bleh.
I'm looking forward to one specific piece of this puzzle, and that's which team can more effectively shut down the other's read-option (bearing in mind that it makes up more of Washington's offense than it does Seattle's). I think you need a speedy defense with disciplined DEs and DBs who can jam guys at the line and still cover them man to man. I see Seattle's ability to do that being stronger than Washington's - and the Hawks have a more diverse offense outside of that set of plays.
Even if both teams shut it down equally... I'd have to say it's going to be Skee-lo versus a pretty suspect secondary pitted against Morris (stud, btw - should be getting a ton more ROY talk than he has) and a solid-but-not-so-elite-as-we-thought Seattle run D.
I like the matchup, even though I think the Skins are the toughest potential matchup for us in the playoffs. Other than TV jamming us up with 10am (Pacific) games on the East Coast, that is. Fortunately, this is a 1PM start time for us, so those road-woes y'all are resting your hopes upon are not so clear (Seattle played two non-10am road games this year... one was a Thursday night game which is a joke for the visiting team, pretty much always, and a 50-burger we dropped in Toronto against the Bills).
Here's to a hard-fought, hard-hitting game with no significant injuries on either side - let's get out of there healthy and without Pete running up the score *too* badly. I like the Skins despite their coach being one of our long-time rivals from back in the days of the AFC West...
Hawks 49, Skins 13.
Go Hawks! |
you sounded like you were reasonable till you predicted the score!   There is no way a team such as the Seahawks who is bad on the road and has to travel cross country to play on a playoff game blows out the Washington redskins who have been playing great ball also the past two months.
_________________
 mike23md
Days until:Minicamp 20; Training camp 64; Eagles @ Redskins 110 RIP SSF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
THESKINSFAN21
Joined: 14 Jul 2011
Posts: 4008
Location: West Palm Beach
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| turtle28 wrote: | | TheDudeAbides wrote: | I call him Skee-lo, but no one seems to care about 90's hip-hop references, so DangerRuss it is... bleh.
I'm looking forward to one specific piece of this puzzle, and that's which team can more effectively shut down the other's read-option (bearing in mind that it makes up more of Washington's offense than it does Seattle's). I think you need a speedy defense with disciplined DEs and DBs who can jam guys at the line and still cover them man to man. I see Seattle's ability to do that being stronger than Washington's - and the Hawks have a more diverse offense outside of that set of plays.
Even if both teams shut it down equally... I'd have to say it's going to be Skee-lo versus a pretty suspect secondary pitted against Morris (stud, btw - should be getting a ton more ROY talk than he has) and a solid-but-not-so-elite-as-we-thought Seattle run D.
I like the matchup, even though I think the Skins are the toughest potential matchup for us in the playoffs. Other than TV jamming us up with 10am (Pacific) games on the East Coast, that is. Fortunately, this is a 1PM start time for us, so those road-woes y'all are resting your hopes upon are not so clear (Seattle played two non-10am road games this year... one was a Thursday night game which is a joke for the visiting team, pretty much always, and a 50-burger we dropped in Toronto against the Bills).
Here's to a hard-fought, hard-hitting game with no significant injuries on either side - let's get out of there healthy and without Pete running up the score *too* badly. I like the Skins despite their coach being one of our long-time rivals from back in the days of the AFC West...
Hawks 49, Skins 13.
Go Hawks! |
you sounded like you were reasonable till you predicted the score! There is no way a team such as the Seahawks who is bad on the road and has to travel cross country to play on a playoff game blows out the Washington redskins who have been playing great ball also the past two months. |
They'll see,we can quote all these guys in a new thread after we win.
_________________
mike23md on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SaveourSonics
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45445
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| turtle28 wrote: | | TheDudeAbides wrote: | I call him Skee-lo, but no one seems to care about 90's hip-hop references, so DangerRuss it is... bleh.
I'm looking forward to one specific piece of this puzzle, and that's which team can more effectively shut down the other's read-option (bearing in mind that it makes up more of Washington's offense than it does Seattle's). I think you need a speedy defense with disciplined DEs and DBs who can jam guys at the line and still cover them man to man. I see Seattle's ability to do that being stronger than Washington's - and the Hawks have a more diverse offense outside of that set of plays.
Even if both teams shut it down equally... I'd have to say it's going to be Skee-lo versus a pretty suspect secondary pitted against Morris (stud, btw - should be getting a ton more ROY talk than he has) and a solid-but-not-so-elite-as-we-thought Seattle run D.
I like the matchup, even though I think the Skins are the toughest potential matchup for us in the playoffs. Other than TV jamming us up with 10am (Pacific) games on the East Coast, that is. Fortunately, this is a 1PM start time for us, so those road-woes y'all are resting your hopes upon are not so clear (Seattle played two non-10am road games this year... one was a Thursday night game which is a joke for the visiting team, pretty much always, and a 50-burger we dropped in Toronto against the Bills).
Here's to a hard-fought, hard-hitting game with no significant injuries on either side - let's get out of there healthy and without Pete running up the score *too* badly. I like the Skins despite their coach being one of our long-time rivals from back in the days of the AFC West...
Hawks 49, Skins 13.
Go Hawks! |
you sounded like you were reasonable till you predicted the score! There is no way a team such as the Seahawks who is bad on the road and has to travel cross country to play on a playoff game blows out the Washington redskins who have been playing great ball also the past two months. |
Do you guys take everything so seriously?
_________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheDudeAbides
Joined: 19 Jan 2011
Posts: 370
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| turtle28 wrote: | | TheDudeAbides wrote: | I call him Skee-lo, but no one seems to care about 90's hip-hop references, so DangerRuss it is... bleh.
I'm looking forward to one specific piece of this puzzle, and that's which team can more effectively shut down the other's read-option (bearing in mind that it makes up more of Washington's offense than it does Seattle's). I think you need a speedy defense with disciplined DEs and DBs who can jam guys at the line and still cover them man to man. I see Seattle's ability to do that being stronger than Washington's - and the Hawks have a more diverse offense outside of that set of plays.
Even if both teams shut it down equally... I'd have to say it's going to be Skee-lo versus a pretty suspect secondary pitted against Morris (stud, btw - should be getting a ton more ROY talk than he has) and a solid-but-not-so-elite-as-we-thought Seattle run D.
I like the matchup, even though I think the Skins are the toughest potential matchup for us in the playoffs. Other than TV jamming us up with 10am (Pacific) games on the East Coast, that is. Fortunately, this is a 1PM start time for us, so those road-woes y'all are resting your hopes upon are not so clear (Seattle played two non-10am road games this year... one was a Thursday night game which is a joke for the visiting team, pretty much always, and a 50-burger we dropped in Toronto against the Bills).
Here's to a hard-fought, hard-hitting game with no significant injuries on either side - let's get out of there healthy and without Pete running up the score *too* badly. I like the Skins despite their coach being one of our long-time rivals from back in the days of the AFC West...
Hawks 49, Skins 13.
Go Hawks! |
you sounded like you were reasonable till you predicted the score! There is no way a team such as the Seahawks who is bad on the road and has to travel cross country to play on a playoff game blows out the Washington redskins who have been playing great ball also the past two months. |
Whoopsie - caught my typo. Thanks!
Hawks 94, Skins 13.
(Seriously... no injuries, exciting game... Go Hawks!)
_________________
TommyC376 on the Sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
THESKINSFAN21
Joined: 14 Jul 2011
Posts: 4008
Location: West Palm Beach
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TheDudeAbides wrote: | | turtle28 wrote: | | TheDudeAbides wrote: | I call him Skee-lo, but no one seems to care about 90's hip-hop references, so DangerRuss it is... bleh.
I'm looking forward to one specific piece of this puzzle, and that's which team can more effectively shut down the other's read-option (bearing in mind that it makes up more of Washington's offense than it does Seattle's). I think you need a speedy defense with disciplined DEs and DBs who can jam guys at the line and still cover them man to man. I see Seattle's ability to do that being stronger than Washington's - and the Hawks have a more diverse offense outside of that set of plays.
Even if both teams shut it down equally... I'd have to say it's going to be Skee-lo versus a pretty suspect secondary pitted against Morris (stud, btw - should be getting a ton more ROY talk than he has) and a solid-but-not-so-elite-as-we-thought Seattle run D.
I like the matchup, even though I think the Skins are the toughest potential matchup for us in the playoffs. Other than TV jamming us up with 10am (Pacific) games on the East Coast, that is. Fortunately, this is a 1PM start time for us, so those road-woes y'all are resting your hopes upon are not so clear (Seattle played two non-10am road games this year... one was a Thursday night game which is a joke for the visiting team, pretty much always, and a 50-burger we dropped in Toronto against the Bills).
Here's to a hard-fought, hard-hitting game with no significant injuries on either side - let's get out of there healthy and without Pete running up the score *too* badly. I like the Skins despite their coach being one of our long-time rivals from back in the days of the AFC West...
Hawks 49, Skins 13.
Go Hawks! |
you sounded like you were reasonable till you predicted the score! There is no way a team such as the Seahawks who is bad on the road and has to travel cross country to play on a playoff game blows out the Washington redskins who have been playing great ball also the past two months. |
Whoopsie - caught my typo. Thanks!
Hawks 94, Skins 13.
(Seriously... no injuries, exciting game... Go Hawks!) |
Nothing better than cocky fans eating crow 
_________________
mike23md on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SnA ExclusiVe
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 10636
Location: Spokane, WA
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TheDudeAbides wrote: | | turtle28 wrote: | | TheDudeAbides wrote: | I call him Skee-lo, but no one seems to care about 90's hip-hop references, so DangerRuss it is... bleh.
I'm looking forward to one specific piece of this puzzle, and that's which team can more effectively shut down the other's read-option (bearing in mind that it makes up more of Washington's offense than it does Seattle's). I think you need a speedy defense with disciplined DEs and DBs who can jam guys at the line and still cover them man to man. I see Seattle's ability to do that being stronger than Washington's - and the Hawks have a more diverse offense outside of that set of plays.
Even if both teams shut it down equally... I'd have to say it's going to be Skee-lo versus a pretty suspect secondary pitted against Morris (stud, btw - should be getting a ton more ROY talk than he has) and a solid-but-not-so-elite-as-we-thought Seattle run D.
I like the matchup, even though I think the Skins are the toughest potential matchup for us in the playoffs. Other than TV jamming us up with 10am (Pacific) games on the East Coast, that is. Fortunately, this is a 1PM start time for us, so those road-woes y'all are resting your hopes upon are not so clear (Seattle played two non-10am road games this year... one was a Thursday night game which is a joke for the visiting team, pretty much always, and a 50-burger we dropped in Toronto against the Bills).
Here's to a hard-fought, hard-hitting game with no significant injuries on either side - let's get out of there healthy and without Pete running up the score *too* badly. I like the Skins despite their coach being one of our long-time rivals from back in the days of the AFC West...
Hawks 49, Skins 13.
Go Hawks! |
you sounded like you were reasonable till you predicted the score! There is no way a team such as the Seahawks who is bad on the road and has to travel cross country to play on a playoff game blows out the Washington redskins who have been playing great ball also the past two months. |
Whoopsie - caught my typo. Thanks!
Hawks 94, Skins 13.
(Seriously... no injuries, exciting game... Go Hawks!) |
Much better!
_________________
| Leon Sandcastle wrote: | | Torrey Smith is a deep threat, he will never be a top-10 WR...he doesn't posses the raw athleticism that Dez does...sorry |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
THESKINSFAN21
Joined: 14 Jul 2011
Posts: 4008
Location: West Palm Beach
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I believe this is the most trolling I've ever experienced on here. I never would have guessed it'd be from seattle fans...
_________________
mike23md on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SaveourSonics
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45445
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SnA ExclusiVe wrote: | | TheDudeAbides wrote: | | turtle28 wrote: | | TheDudeAbides wrote: | I call him Skee-lo, but no one seems to care about 90's hip-hop references, so DangerRuss it is... bleh.
I'm looking forward to one specific piece of this puzzle, and that's which team can more effectively shut down the other's read-option (bearing in mind that it makes up more of Washington's offense than it does Seattle's). I think you need a speedy defense with disciplined DEs and DBs who can jam guys at the line and still cover them man to man. I see Seattle's ability to do that being stronger than Washington's - and the Hawks have a more diverse offense outside of that set of plays.
Even if both teams shut it down equally... I'd have to say it's going to be Skee-lo versus a pretty suspect secondary pitted against Morris (stud, btw - should be getting a ton more ROY talk than he has) and a solid-but-not-so-elite-as-we-thought Seattle run D.
I like the matchup, even though I think the Skins are the toughest potential matchup for us in the playoffs. Other than TV jamming us up with 10am (Pacific) games on the East Coast, that is. Fortunately, this is a 1PM start time for us, so those road-woes y'all are resting your hopes upon are not so clear (Seattle played two non-10am road games this year... one was a Thursday night game which is a joke for the visiting team, pretty much always, and a 50-burger we dropped in Toronto against the Bills).
Here's to a hard-fought, hard-hitting game with no significant injuries on either side - let's get out of there healthy and without Pete running up the score *too* badly. I like the Skins despite their coach being one of our long-time rivals from back in the days of the AFC West...
Hawks 49, Skins 13.
Go Hawks! |
you sounded like you were reasonable till you predicted the score! There is no way a team such as the Seahawks who is bad on the road and has to travel cross country to play on a playoff game blows out the Washington redskins who have been playing great ball also the past two months. |
Whoopsie - caught my typo. Thanks!
Hawks 94, Skins 13.
(Seriously... no injuries, exciting game... Go Hawks!) |
Much better! |
He forgot the decimal point.
Hawks 94, Skins 1.3
_________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PARROTHEAD
Joined: 08 Mar 2009
Posts: 4165
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I asked around my country. Nobody here even knows the Seattle Seahawks exist. Or that theres even a city called Seattle.
But I say its in Washington State in America. They say, "Oh where Mike Leach coaches. Hes the best!" And Im all, "Noo. Washington State isnt the teams name, Seattle is their name."
Goes to show how irrelevant they are to pretty much everyone on the globe.
Redskins 38
Seahawks 16
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SaveourSonics
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45445
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| THESKINSFAN21 wrote: | | I believe this is the most trolling I've ever experienced on here. I never would have guessed it'd be from seattle fans... |
Read the first few pages of this thread. This is what Seattle fans do. We love us some light-hearted pregame trash talking. If you guys can't handle it (and I'm actually being 100% serious here) just tell us to leave and we'll stay in our forum. We just like to interact with the other teams' fans. We don't take this as life or death.
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=508904
See PARROTHEAD, that's the spirit
_________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SnA ExclusiVe
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 10636
Location: Spokane, WA
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| PARROTHEAD wrote: | I asked around my country. Nobody here even knows the Seattle Seahawks exist. Or that theres even a city called Seattle.
But I say its in Washington State in America. They say, "Oh where Mike Leach coaches. Hes the best!" And Im all, "Noo. Washington State isnt the teams name, Seattle is their name."
Goes to show how irrelevant they are to pretty much everyone on the globe.
Redskins 38
Seahawks 16 |
Goes to show how little your "country" pays attention to football, if you ask me.
_________________
| Leon Sandcastle wrote: | | Torrey Smith is a deep threat, he will never be a top-10 WR...he doesn't posses the raw athleticism that Dez does...sorry |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
THESKINSFAN21
Joined: 14 Jul 2011
Posts: 4008
Location: West Palm Beach
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SaveourSonics wrote: | | THESKINSFAN21 wrote: | | I believe this is the most trolling I've ever experienced on here. I never would have guessed it'd be from seattle fans... |
Read the first few pages of this thread. This is what Seattle fans do. We love us some light-hearted pregame trash talking. If you guys can't handle it (and I'm actually being 100% serious here) just tell us to leave and we'll stay in our forum. We just like to interact with the other teams' fans. We don't take this as life or death.
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=508904
See PARROTHEAD, that's the spirit |
No,please stay. It'll be nice to have you here when you come back down to earth.Speaking for myself onlu,I take football very seriously,I bleed B&G.
_________________
mike23md on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PARROTHEAD
Joined: 08 Mar 2009
Posts: 4165
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Ill be nice and not say what I was saying.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
