| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
FREDDY T
Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 5287
Location: NY
|
 Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 10:01 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| gabbert is still twice the prospect that geno is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JDJaguar
Joined: 06 Jan 2013
Posts: 140
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FREDDY T wrote: | | gabbert is still twice the prospect that geno is. |
I....eh.....Lost my train of thought. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iPwn
Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Posts: 35477
Location: Stand United
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FREDDY T wrote: | | gabbert is still twice the prospect that geno is. |
I'm not sure how anyone can come to this conclusion.
_________________
 | samgurl775 wrote: | | It's alright iPwn, you're my #1. |
| EliteTexan80 wrote: | | I AM TRYING TO BE PWNY! AND I AM NOT! AND THIS VEXES ME SORE!!! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skaterbirdhouse
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 8379
Location: Gainesville
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| iPwn wrote: | | FREDDY T wrote: | | gabbert is still twice the prospect that geno is. |
I'm not sure how anyone can come to this conclusion. |
I don't like Geno at all, and would almost agree with this conclusion. Except there is still that factor of unknown. Geno has never seen an NFL field before so he could shock me and actually be decent where as we are getting to the point we know for sure what Gabbert brings to the table.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73481
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| iPwn wrote: | | FREDDY T wrote: | | gabbert is still twice the prospect that geno is. |
I'm not sure how anyone can come to this conclusion. |
I agree, Geno>Gabbert as a prospect.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Adrenaline_Flux
Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 15123
Location: The Iowa
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | iPwn wrote: | | FREDDY T wrote: | | gabbert is still twice the prospect that geno is. |
I'm not sure how anyone can come to this conclusion. |
I agree, Geno>Gabbert as a prospect. |
I think if Gabbert had redshirted and stayed in college every year (ie: coming out this year) that he'd probably be a better prospect than Geno. In 2011, there was debate for a while whether it was Gabbert or Cam Newton at #1 and Newton was a better prospect than Geno (though I like Geno and wasn't sold on Newton coming out).
_________________
Sig Credit: ChrisC21325 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MoJo122-b-21
Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 5757
Location: Not London!
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| iPwn wrote: | | FREDDY T wrote: | | gabbert is still twice the prospect that geno is. |
I'm not sure how anyone can come to this conclusion. |
As a prospect coming out, I think Gabbert would be the consensus number one pick, at least as far as the coverage.
Blaine has everything you want in a mold-able young ballplayer, he's just had struggles putting it together, for a number of reasons - many of which can be argued as out of his control.
All things being equal, I'd much rather draft Gabbert than anyone in this draft class.
_________________
"We're not trying to win the AFC South, we're trying to own the AFC South."
- Gus Bradley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73481
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Adrenaline_Flux wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | iPwn wrote: | | FREDDY T wrote: | | gabbert is still twice the prospect that geno is. |
I'm not sure how anyone can come to this conclusion. |
I agree, Geno>Gabbert as a prospect. |
I think if Gabbert had redshirted and stayed in college every year (ie: coming out this year) that he'd probably be a better prospect than Geno. In 2011, there was debate for a while whether it was Gabbert or Cam Newton at #1 and Newton was a better prospect than Geno (though I like Geno and wasn't sold on Newton coming out). |
Thats a big if though, we are just comparing how the were when they came out though
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Adrenaline_Flux
Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 15123
Location: The Iowa
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | Adrenaline_Flux wrote: | | JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | iPwn wrote: | | FREDDY T wrote: | | gabbert is still twice the prospect that geno is. |
I'm not sure how anyone can come to this conclusion. |
I agree, Geno>Gabbert as a prospect. |
I think if Gabbert had redshirted and stayed in college every year (ie: coming out this year) that he'd probably be a better prospect than Geno. In 2011, there was debate for a while whether it was Gabbert or Cam Newton at #1 and Newton was a better prospect than Geno (though I like Geno and wasn't sold on Newton coming out). |
Thats a big if though, we are just comparing how the were when they came out though |
Yeah... like I said, as a true junior coming out, for a while at least, he was discussed as possibly the #1 overall pick over Cam Newton. Geno as he is right now never would have come close to being in that discussion considering many aren't even sure if we'll see him go #1 this year in a very weak QB class.
_________________
Sig Credit: ChrisC21325 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FREDDY T
Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 5287
Location: NY
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Blaine gabbert in comparison to geno smith: greater arm talent, size, maturity, experience in the league.
They are equivalent in terms of pocket presence (IMO).
Maybe, not even really sure about this, maybe geno smith has slightly better accuracy on the WR screens that he throws.
Give me Gabbert any day of the week. You put geno smith on the jaguars last year and we don't go any better than 2-14. Obviously I cannot prove that statement but we have to get off that bandwagon.
Geno smith lacks the talent and the maturity to be successful. The fact that he is mentioned in the conversation of top pick is an insult to former #1 draft picks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
corry
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 2422
Location: Orlando, FL
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Geno throws a great deep ball, which is something Blaine lacks.
_________________
2nd place in Jaguars forum USJJC 2012
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sadjag
Joined: 02 Mar 2012
Posts: 846
Location: jax
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FREDDY T wrote: |
They are equivalent in terms of pocket presence (IMO).
|
just wow. Remind me too never too pay attention to anything you say ever again.
_________________
...What? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tugboat
Joined: 30 Mar 2011
Posts: 1309
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | Tugboat wrote: | Clowney is ridiculously talented...
but tbh i'd still prefer Bridgewater over him. QB is just too crucial a position to skimp. whereas, you can get a lot done with a very good all around D-line, even without a Clowney-calibre elite player. |
Geno this year, then Clowney next  |
Or, one of the Pass Rushers this year, Teddy next year.
I think there are a handful of enticing pass rushers this year, who while not in 'Clowney territory' as prospects, look very capable of being impact players in their own right.
The drop off from Teddy to Geno though...not even in the same ballpark imo.
It's all probably a moot point, as it seems the Chiefs are leaning towards Geno now anyway.
And more importantly, i'm sure we'll find a way to win just enough games to miss out on the opportunity to grab Teddy (or Clowney) next year anyway. Because Jaguars... 
But there are plenty of other talented looking QBs who should be out there next year regardless.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FREDDY T
Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 5287
Location: NY
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| sadjag wrote: | | FREDDY T wrote: |
They are equivalent in terms of pocket presence (IMO).
|
just wow. Remind me too never too pay attention to anything you say ever again. |
When is the last time gabbert took 2 safeties in a playoff/bowl game? how about any time?
Watch geno smith, pressure gets in his face and he is nothing, not that he is anything special in the first place.
Matt scott in the 4th is a much better deal than geno in round 1 or 2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaguarfan
Joined: 27 Nov 2011
Posts: 11379
Location: Scarlet Town
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| FREDDY T wrote: | | sadjag wrote: | | FREDDY T wrote: |
They are equivalent in terms of pocket presence (IMO).
|
just wow. Remind me too never too pay attention to anything you say ever again. |
When is the last time gabbert took 2 safeties in a playoff/bowl game? how about any time?
Watch geno smith, pressure gets in his face and he is nothing, not that he is anything special in the first place.
Matt scott in the 4th is a much better deal than geno in round 1 or 2. |
Geno has pretty atrocious footwork, but your argument is laughably bad. Did you watch the bowl game? Geno got tripped on one safety, and had zero time on the second.
_________________
Kempes on the sig
| TheVillain112 wrote: | | Can you gif the old man trying to lure the girl in using the fishing pole with a dollar bill on it? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
