| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Who wins? |
| OAK |
|
50% |
[ 7 ] |
| SD |
|
50% |
[ 7 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 14 |
|
| Author |
Message |
BlackPrestige92
Joined: 08 Nov 2011
Posts: 2614
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:19 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
For some people to be mad that Pryor is getting a start is just incomprehensible....were some of you going HAM for Matt Leinart to get a start? Like "Awwww yeaaah! Paris Hilton in the houussse!"
What can be so wrong about a young guy getting a shot?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TiberiusRising
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 5559
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| LivingLegendWFC wrote: | | Hard not to get excited about the young guy getting a shot. It was a pretty easy call between him and leinart IMO. Hopefully Pryor does what I believe he's capable of and shows the skills that put his name in a competition next year. |
In the end regardless of who the better player is it would hard for me to agree with the coaching staff had they chosen Leinhart over Pryor in this situation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raiiiiidersssss
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 4117
Location: The Black Hole
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think we will get a pretty definitive answer to the question of whether or not Pryor has theaability to last in the NFL as a starting qb
_________________
If the Raiders don't trade back at 3, I want Fisher, Ziggy, or Star. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TiberiusRising
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 5559
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Raiiiiidersssss wrote: | | I think we will get a pretty definitive answer to the question of whether or not Pryor has theaability to last in the NFL as a starting qb |
Hopefully, but maybe not. If he has just a decent game questions may loom. Its gotta be horrible or good to make any future assumptions. Hoping for the latter of course. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bitty
Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 2985
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
This is a no win situation for Allen. If Pryor plays great then people will say why didn't you put him in earlier in the year.
If he sucks then Allen is doing a poor job coaching him.
damned if you do damned if you don't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justwinbaby81
Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 3080
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bitty wrote: | This is a no win situation for Allen. If Pryor plays great then people will say why didn't you put him in earlier in the year.
If he sucks then Allen is doing a poor job coaching him.
damned if you do damned if you don't. |
Not here. I give props to Allen for taking a step in EVALUATING THE FUTURE. That's what I have been asking for all along. He's doing it now. This could be a step in determining what to do with Pryor, good or bad. I hope he takes this steps at more than just QB this week. The past is the past, at least he is correcting his mistake against the 9 volts.
Pryor gets some valuable playing time, the front office/Allen can use this as an audition for him and others...Allen deserves some credit for admitting it is more worthwhile to start Pryor over Leinart. And this is coming from a guy who has praised Allen very few times this season.
_________________
cdUbs14 doin work |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TiberiusRising
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 5559
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raiiiiidersssss
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 4117
Location: The Black Hole
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Over / under 100 rush yards for Pryor?
Over under 150 passing yards for Pryor?
_________________
If the Raiders don't trade back at 3, I want Fisher, Ziggy, or Star. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TiberiusRising
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 5559
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Raiiiiidersssss wrote: | Over / under 100 rush yards for Pryor?
Over under 150 passing yards for Pryor? |
I would say over on both but not by much. I would prefer over on the passing yards only though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12573
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oakdb36
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 12742
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JTagg7754 wrote: | | BigMike1b wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | I'm assuming that we're going to use more roll outs, shot gun formations, and maybe even some read option plays this week. |
We're probably going to have to keep it limited to the 10 plays Pryor knows. |
C'mon man. You call out people for being trolls and well, here you are....trolling 
Give him a shot brotha man. |
This is hardly trolling. It's a slightly fabricated response based off an educated person's view. It doesn't matter what I think anyway. He's playing. He could have a good game and we'll have the few special ones in here talking about how they were right blah blah blah using this one game as a crutch all up until next season and completely discredit all the other crappy games he's had etc or he'll have a bad game and they're going to say it's only b/c he didn't have time to prepare.
Again, I expect a very mediocre to below average day passing and a couple good runs and people will need to change their underwear as a result of those runs. |
Yeah, exactly like you would if it was backing up your stance. So much fail.
_________________
| Plush wrote: | | Papa was a trolling stone |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raiiiiidersssss
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 4117
Location: The Black Hole
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Why would you want to see Leinart play over Pryor? We know Leinart is subpar -- we aren't 100% sure with Pryor.
_________________
If the Raiders don't trade back at 3, I want Fisher, Ziggy, or Star. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
macklemore
Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 1425
Location: Seattle, WA
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
damn, elizabeth hurley is still hot.
not bad for almost 50. I need to find an english chick, they age well.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dmac505
Joined: 07 Aug 2008
Posts: 615
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| oakdb36 wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | BigMike1b wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | I'm assuming that we're going to use more roll outs, shot gun formations, and maybe even some read option plays this week. |
We're probably going to have to keep it limited to the 10 plays Pryor knows. |
C'mon man. You call out people for being trolls and well, here you are....trolling
Give him a shot brotha man. |
This is hardly trolling. It's a slightly fabricated response based off an educated person's view. It doesn't matter what I think anyway. He's playing. He could have a good game and we'll have the few special ones in here talking about how they were right blah blah blah using this one game as a crutch all up until next season and completely discredit all the other crappy games he's had etc or he'll have a bad game and they're going to say it's only b/c he didn't have time to prepare.
Again, I expect a very mediocre to below average day passing and a couple good runs and people will need to change their underwear as a result of those runs. |
Yeah, exactly like you would if it was backing up your stance. So much fail. |
Hey Jtagg, if Pryor has a brutal game are you gonna see oh I told you so? Or are you gonna say small sample size?
I have a feeling if he's brutal your gonna be posting I told ya so... So lets not act like its only the people who want to see him play well who are going to over value this game.
Fact is, 1 game / first game ever doesn't write your career story. Regardless on how great or how bad
_________________
Uploaded with ImageShack.us |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dmac505
Joined: 07 Aug 2008
Posts: 615
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Also not to put you on spot, but would you rather see Pryor play well or brutal?
_________________
Uploaded with ImageShack.us |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
