| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Who wins? |
| OAK |
|
50% |
[ 7 ] |
| SD |
|
50% |
[ 7 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 14 |
|
| Author |
Message |
ZoomWaffle 
Joined: 25 Apr 2010 Posts: 4604 Location: AZ
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:42 pm Post subject: RAIDERS @ CHARGERS Week 17 GDT |
|
|
|
RAIDERS (4-11) @ CHARGERS (6-9)
Last Matchup: week 1, SD-22, OAK-14
Matt Leinart can have one good game, right?
Or will Pryor save the day while rushing for 250 yards?
Will Allen offer Norv a job during their handshake?
This is a game between two beaten-down, disappointing teams. The only thing on the line now is pride. A top-9 selection is already locked up, and if we lose we have a shot at a top-3.
Oakland's keys to victory:
-Offense: Get the run game going. Goodson and Reece have been very good in limited action this year, and they really need to be given more touches this week. McFadden has been able to pop out a couple good games, but has been more disappointing than anything. We need the other two to carry our offense this week. If we can get the run game rolling, whoever is playing QB just needs to protect the football and convert on 3rd down.
-Defense: SD's run game is flat without Mathews. The RBs we held to 32 yards on 20 carries in week 1 are the same ones we will see Sunday. That means all we need to worry about is Rivers, although that presents a hefty task. If we cant pressure him, he will eat us up. We have to be on top of our game on defense to stand a chance. If we let them score more that 20 points, I dont see us having a shot to win.
San Diego's keys to victory:
-Offense: Protect Rivers, let him do his thing, and hope he doesnt make mistakes. They arent likely to get much help in the run game, but they have beaten us before on Rivers' arm alone.
-Defense: Shut down our run game and they win- its that simple. If, at any point, we are relying on Leinart or Pryor to carry our offense, its already too late.
Obligatory hot chicks:
 _________________
Silver&Black88 on the sig
| La_Vader wrote: | | I wouldn't trade Pryor for any prospect in this years draft. Quote me on that |
Last edited by ZoomWaffle on Fri Dec 28, 2012 10:13 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JTagg7754 
Joined: 09 Nov 2010 Posts: 7399 Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:44 pm Post subject: Re: RAIDERS @ CHARGERS Week 17 GDT |
|
|
|
| ZoomWaffle wrote: |
I'll add some pics to spice it up when I'm not on a gov't computer. |
Personally, I think it's fine but I'm also kinda shocked you can post from a government computer LOL. _________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZoomWaffle 
Joined: 25 Apr 2010 Posts: 4604 Location: AZ
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Damn, I sure picked the wrong game to buy tickets to. I bought them so long ago, that there was still a chance we could at least be playing spoiler. Now I'm going to SD and relying on Leinart - this will not be fun. _________________
Silver&Black88 on the sig
| La_Vader wrote: | | I wouldn't trade Pryor for any prospect in this years draft. Quote me on that |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZoomWaffle 
Joined: 25 Apr 2010 Posts: 4604 Location: AZ
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:47 pm Post subject: Re: RAIDERS @ CHARGERS Week 17 GDT |
|
|
|
| JTagg7754 wrote: | | ZoomWaffle wrote: |
I'll add some pics to spice it up when I'm not on a gov't computer. |
Personally, I think it's fine but I'm also kinda shocked you can post from a government computer LOL. |
Ha, yea they block a lot of sites, but luckily not this one. Pretty sure they do it so they have more ways of monitoring us... _________________
Silver&Black88 on the sig
| La_Vader wrote: | | I wouldn't trade Pryor for any prospect in this years draft. Quote me on that |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RaiderX 
Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 17256 Location: Crown Town, CA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'll be in SD...for NYE. Leinart will likely start.
The more I've thought about it, this is essentially Pryor's rookie season. Last year would have been his senior season at OSU and it was basically time to work on his mechanics and working under center. So if Pryor sees little time its not the end of the world. He'll be back next season, Leinart won't. Ideally I want Pryor to get plenty of significant snaps. All the games he was inactive could lead to him not being ready to start. But Allen wants to see what he can do eventually by having him suit up the past 3 games. _________________
| SaveourSonics wrote: | | Yea, RaiderX wins. We can all just top acting like this is a matter of opinion. MY GOD. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
oakdb36 
Joined: 02 Mar 2006 Posts: 12824
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
For the first time in my life, i hope we lose. _________________
| Plush wrote: | | Papa was a trolling stone |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OakRaiders3828 
Joined: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 9267 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I still hope we win. A positive note to end the season is a good thing. _________________
O A K L A N D R A I D E R S
Joe_is_the_best on the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Silver&Black88 
Joined: 24 Feb 2009 Posts: 25034 Location: Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| just win baby, lets make rivers cry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
opeth0500
Joined: 18 Mar 2008 Posts: 1013 Location: So Cal
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Ill be going to this game. This will be my first Raider game, too bad it's not going to be worth anything. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NCOUGHMAN 
Joined: 25 Mar 2008 Posts: 12643 Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
we are 5-10? kc, kc, jax, pitt where did our 5th win come from? _________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BigMike1b 
Joined: 27 Apr 2008 Posts: 1879 Location: 626, CA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | we are 5-10? kc, kc, jax, pitt where did our 5th win come from? |
It's a typo. We only have 4. _________________
2012 Adopt a Raider: DE Lamarr Houston
Silver&Black88 with the sweet sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bo_Spice 
Joined: 17 May 2009 Posts: 7076
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think our defense will keep the game close but our inability to run the ball or move the ball downfield in the passing game will cost us any chance of winning. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NCOUGHMAN 
Joined: 25 Mar 2008 Posts: 12643 Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BigMike1b wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | we are 5-10? kc, kc, jax, pitt where did our 5th win come from? |
It's a typo. We only have 4. |
yup and 11 losses not 10  _________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BlackPrestige92 
Joined: 08 Nov 2011 Posts: 3057
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Just lose baby.
btw, more hot chicks please. Can I get a witness!? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nodisrespect 
Joined: 28 Nov 2009 Posts: 2926 Location: in the present
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 1:20 pm Post subject: Re: RAIDERS @ CHARGERS Week 17 GDT |
|
|
|
| ZoomWaffle wrote: |
| who is this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|