| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Tugboat
Joined: 30 Mar 2011
Posts: 1309
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:58 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| iPwn wrote: | | I swear if this logo makes the tWo obsolete, I will riot. |
Same.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adrenaline_Flux
Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 14999
Location: The Iowa
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
You act like the new logo isn't the tWo logo.
_________________
Sig Credit: iPwn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73424
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Adrenaline_Flux wrote: | | You act like the new logo isn't the tWo logo. |
 Yes! Make it happen Khan
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaguarfan
Joined: 27 Nov 2011
Posts: 11271
Location: Scarlet Town
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| iPwn wrote: | At least we never got these:
Since 2010......
Stadium renamed
New jerseys
New owner
New coach
New GM
New coach again
New jerseys again
New logo
Wow. |
We should make those our throwback unis.
I don't like changing the logo. I love our logo. I mean, if they can make it better sweet, but they screwed up the Panthers logo, and I don't want them to screw up ours.
_________________
Kempes on the sig
| TheVillain112 wrote: | | Can you gif the old man trying to lure the girl in using the fishing pole with a dollar bill on it? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73424
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The panthers logo changed?... 
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaguarfan
Joined: 27 Nov 2011
Posts: 11271
Location: Scarlet Town
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | The panthers logo changed?... |
Last season it did.
_________________
Kempes on the sig
| TheVillain112 wrote: | | Can you gif the old man trying to lure the girl in using the fishing pole with a dollar bill on it? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iPwn
Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Posts: 35184
Location: Stand United
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jaguarfan wrote: | | iPwn wrote: | At least we never got these:
Since 2010......
Stadium renamed
New jerseys
New owner
New coach
New GM
New coach again
New jerseys again
New logo
Wow. |
We should make those our throwback unis.
I don't like changing the logo. I love our logo. I mean, if they can make it better sweet, but they screwed up the Panthers logo, and I don't want them to screw up ours. |
We can't use that logo. Jaguar (car company) thinks the logo too closely resembles their logo. That's the only reason we went with the one we have now.
Hopefully we don't end up with something as awful as this:
The majority of logo changes have been good though.
http://www.sportslogos.net/teams/list_by_league/7/National_Football_League/NFL/logos/
There's only a couple that I like the old logo over the newer ones.
_________________
 | samgurl775 wrote: | | It's alright iPwn, you're my #1. |
| EliteTexan80 wrote: | | I AM TRYING TO BE PWNY! AND I AM NOT! AND THIS VEXES ME SORE!!! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaguarfan
Joined: 27 Nov 2011
Posts: 11271
Location: Scarlet Town
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| iPwn wrote: | | Jaguarfan wrote: | | iPwn wrote: | At least we never got these:
Since 2010......
Stadium renamed
New jerseys
New owner
New coach
New GM
New coach again
New jerseys again
New logo
Wow. |
We should make those our throwback unis.
I don't like changing the logo. I love our logo. I mean, if they can make it better sweet, but they screwed up the Panthers logo, and I don't want them to screw up ours. |
We can't use that logo. Jaguar (car company) thinks the logo too closely resembles their logo. That's the only reason we went with the one we have now.
Hopefully we don't end up with something as awful as this:
The majority of logo changes have been good though.
http://www.sportslogos.net/teams/list_by_league/7/National_Football_League/NFL/logos/
There's only a couple that I like the old logo over the newer ones. |
I know we can't use the logo, but I dig the unis as a whole.
And it very much worries me that us and the Dolphins are changing logos in the same year and THAT might be what they want for the Phins.
_________________
Kempes on the sig
| TheVillain112 wrote: | | Can you gif the old man trying to lure the girl in using the fishing pole with a dollar bill on it? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr. V
Joined: 07 Sep 2011
Posts: 2604
Location: Florida
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2013 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Vic did a good job of writing things that I wanted to read, but his opinions were pretty bad imo. I don't visit jaguars.com anymore except for the press conferences.
_________________
Thank you daboyle250 for the sig. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MoJo122-b-21
Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 5743
Location: Not London!
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't know the odds of Brandon Albert hitting free agency, but would anybody have beef with bringing him in to play next to Monroe like in their Virginia days?
It would free-up Rackley to be an option at RT and center, making camp more competitive in the weak spots (RT and C).
No idea what he may cost though.
I'm also curious as to Phil Landholt as a possible answer at RT.
_________________
"We're not trying to win the AFC South, we're trying to own the AFC South."
- Gus Bradley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Adrenaline_Flux
Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 14999
Location: The Iowa
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | I don't know the odds of Brandon Albert hitting free agency, but would anybody have beef with bringing him in to play next to Monroe like in their Virginia days?
It would free-up Rackley to be an option at RT and center, making camp more competitive in the weak spots (RT and C).
No idea what he may cost though.
I'm also curious as to Phil Landholt as a possible answer at RT. |
OR...
we would play Rackley at LG, Brewster at C, and Albert at RT :3
_________________
Sig Credit: iPwn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MoJo122-b-21
Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 5743
Location: Not London!
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Adrenaline_Flux wrote: | | MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | I don't know the odds of Brandon Albert hitting free agency, but would anybody have beef with bringing him in to play next to Monroe like in their Virginia days?
It would free-up Rackley to be an option at RT and center, making camp more competitive in the weak spots (RT and C).
No idea what he may cost though.
I'm also curious as to Phil Landholt as a possible answer at RT. |
OR...
we would play Rackley at LG, Brewster at C, and Albert at RT :3 |
I don't think Brewster is the answer at center, but I'll admit he's an option. I'd be much more comfortable with Rackley moving forward, provided there's someone to step in at LG - which is why Albert came to mind. I kind of assumed he'd have played RT at Virginia if he was a good fit there. Bit it's just an assumption.
I was thinking Albert could upgrade two positions in the interior with the answer at RT coming in the second or third round. The same could definitely be said for guard in such a talent-rich big man draft.
_________________
"We're not trying to win the AFC South, we're trying to own the AFC South."
- Gus Bradley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
corry
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 2421
Location: Orlando, FL
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MoJo122-b-21 wrote: | I don't know the odds of Brandon Albert hitting free agency, but would anybody have beef with bringing him in to play next to Monroe like in their Virginia days?
It would free-up Rackley to be an option at RT and center, making camp more competitive in the weak spots (RT and C).
No idea what he may cost though.
I'm also curious as to Phil Landholt as a possible answer at RT. |
I think Albert is going to fall into the "high priced" category that we're trying to avoid.
| Bill Polian wrote: |
He's a high draft choice who has disappointed at tackle for Kansas City. There has been some talk about him moving to guard, which is where I see him fitting best and which will affect the offers he receives. I tend to slot him more
as a B player, but certain teams get enamored by size and he's certainly got that (6-foot-5, 316 pounds), so there probably will be a market for him.
|
_________________
2nd place in Jaguars forum USJJC 2012
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tugboat
Joined: 30 Mar 2011
Posts: 1309
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'm still really wary about the idea of Brewster starting at Center...but on the other hand, I could see him being better there than at Guard, if that's where he's more comfortable. And the different role might suit him better. There's also the whole offseason to continue working on things. And there aren't exactly a huge array of alternatives at C for immediate plug-n-play goodness.
A Rackley-Brewster-Uche interior line just really doesn't instil much confidence at this point...but who knows?
RT is the most bleak spot imo. Bradfield...just isn't good enough. Hope Caldwell addresses the spot, be that draft of FA.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MoJo122-b-21
Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 5743
Location: Not London!
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tugboat wrote: | I'm still really wary about the idea of Brewster starting at Center...but on the other hand, I could see him being better there than at Guard, if that's where he's more comfortable. And the different role might suit him better. There's also the whole offseason to continue working on things. And there aren't exactly a huge array of alternatives at C for immediate plug-n-play goodness.
A Rackley-Brewster-Uche interior line just really doesn't instil much confidence at this point...but who knows?
RT is the most bleak spot imo. Bradfield...just isn't good enough. Hope Caldwell addresses the spot, be that draft of FA. |
Some guys' ceiling is quality depth, which isn't a bad thing, but it's most likely Brewster's thing. I agree RT is the big hole, but Meester's age is catching up as a similar priority. Bradfield is quality depth as well, but him starting more than in a pinch isn't a good scenario.
_________________
"We're not trying to win the AFC South, we're trying to own the AFC South."
- Gus Bradley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
