You are currently viewing the old forums. We have upgraded to a new NFL Forum. This old forum is being left as a read-only archive.
Please update your bookmarks to our new forum at forums.footballsfuture.com.
I didn't ask you if it was correct, I asked you if it's hard to believe if he is correct.
And my post has nothing to do with whether it's correct or not, it has to do with his vague information which is clearly pandering to the fans.
For example, who threw out the tests? Did the tester throw out the tests after finding something wrong with them and retested in the future? Did the lab throw out the tests? Did the league throw out the tests?
And is 6 tests in 6 months a bad thing? What happens if there is a 1% throw out rate for tests and they do 100 tests per month? In that context, 6 tests being thrown out in 6 months is average.
Like I said, we have no idea about the numbers here. Sherman gave no context. He just gave out vague information to earn positive PR.
are you nuts? that's a ridiculous number to pull out of your arse to strengthen your argument.
a failure rate that high would make the ENTIRE PROCESS invalid.
condoms have a lower failure rate for [inappropriate/removed] sake.
think once in a while.
Alright, give me the percentage then. Go ahead. It was an example with a number that I pulled out of nowhere, you nitwit. It wasn't meant to be realistic. It was just asking for context in his supposed information. _________________
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum