NFL Forum :: - My Source: QB Search Will "Exhaust All Resources"

Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

FAQ Register Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in

FootballsFuture.com Home

My Source: QB Search Will "Exhaust All Resources"
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... , 9, 10, 11 Next

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Arizona Cardinals

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

Boise&cards Fan

Joined: 03 Dec 2010
Posts: 3194

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:19 pm Post subject:

Yibbyl wrote:

Boise&cards Fan wrote:

So no Qb in the top 10. They all suck

Based on this one game or ???

More then just this game. None of them are really that good.

DirtyDez

Joined: 15 Oct 2010
Posts: 16119
Location: the Arizona desert

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:19 pm Post subject:

Still don't know who else KC could take over Geno at #1...
_________________

mike23md

stchamp98

Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 55189
Location: Havre, Montana

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:20 pm Post subject:

DirtyDez wrote:

Still don't know who else KC could take over Geno at #1...

Let Albert walk as an UFA and take Joeckel. That'd be my guess.

Boise&cards Fan

Joined: 03 Dec 2010
Posts: 3194

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:23 pm Post subject:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

Still don't know who else KC could take over Geno at #1...

Let Albert walk as an UFA and take Joeckel. That'd be my guess.

I can see this with them taking a QB in round 2

Last edited by Boise&cards Fan on Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:24 pm; edited 1 time in total

AZCardinalsFan

Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 1321

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:23 pm Post subject:

khodder wrote:

AZCardinalsFan wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

AZCardinalsFan wrote:

so I just looked at David Fales stats from the game the other day. Not bad at all 33/43 395 yards 9.2 avg. and 2 tds

What did you all think about his performance? I only caught a bit of it

It was a solid performance, no doubt about it. Little worried about the velocity though.

Yeah thats was caught my eye on his throws was the lack of zip on them.

He rips it when he needs too. He was also playing in 25-35 MPH winds in that bowl game.

Ill take your word on it. Maybe it was the wind that played a role but his throws looked like the floated with what i saw

DirtyDez

Joined: 15 Oct 2010
Posts: 16119
Location: the Arizona desert

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:46 pm Post subject:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

Still don't know who else KC could take over Geno at #1...

Let Albert walk as an UFA and take Joeckel. That'd be my guess.

That would be great for us for a number of different reasons. Don't see it happening though. KC already has a good Tackle they should keep him.
_________________

mike23md

stchamp98

Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 55189
Location: Havre, Montana

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:48 pm Post subject:

DirtyDez wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

Still don't know who else KC could take over Geno at #1...

Let Albert walk as an UFA and take Joeckel. That'd be my guess.

That would be great for us for a number of different reasons. Don't see it happening though. KC already has a good Tackle they should keep him.

Maybe. Or they save a ton of money by not signing Albert, they use that money to sign other players at positions they desperately need and if Joeckel turns out to be as good as everyone thinks they actually upgrade at LT too.

DirtyDez

Joined: 15 Oct 2010
Posts: 16119
Location: the Arizona desert

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:06 pm Post subject:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

Still don't know who else KC could take over Geno at #1...

Let Albert walk as an UFA and take Joeckel. That'd be my guess.

That would be great for us for a number of different reasons. Don't see it happening though. KC already has a good Tackle they should keep him.

Eg I guess but they're not hurting financially. Dorsey is gone and cutting Cassell/Jackson will save a ton. Even if they re-sign Bowe they can easily afford Albert. I hope for our sake they let Albert go.
_________________

mike23md

iRobot

Joined: 17 Nov 2011
Posts: 790
Location: Mesa, AZ

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:08 pm Post subject:

DirtyDez wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

Still don't know who else KC could take over Geno at #1...

Let Albert walk as an UFA and take Joeckel. That'd be my guess.

That would be great for us for a number of different reasons. Don't see it happening though. KC already has a good Tackle they should keep him.

Why for our sake?

Cusi10

Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 368

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:13 pm Post subject:

iRobot wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

Still don't know who else KC could take over Geno at #1...

Let Albert walk as an UFA and take Joeckel. That'd be my guess.

That would be great for us for a number of different reasons. Don't see it happening though. KC already has a good Tackle they should keep him.

Why for our sake?

so that they pass on geno and he falls to us so we can take him.

iRobot

Joined: 17 Nov 2011
Posts: 790
Location: Mesa, AZ

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:22 pm Post subject:

Cusi10 wrote:

iRobot wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

Still don't know who else KC could take over Geno at #1...

Let Albert walk as an UFA and take Joeckel. That'd be my guess.

That would be great for us for a number of different reasons. Don't see it happening though. KC already has a good Tackle they should keep him.

I dunno, I'm not even sold on taking Geno at this point. His bowl game looked pretty blah and I think he would need the year of coaching in order to be a starter. Picking a QB that high, I'd want someone who is going to be good from day 1 to start.
Eg I guess but they're not hurting financially. Dorsey is gone and cutting Cassell/Jackson will save a ton. Even if they re-sign Bowe they can easily afford Albert. I hope for our sake they let Albert go.

Why for our sake?

so that they pass on geno and he falls to us so we can take him.

DirtyDez

Joined: 15 Oct 2010
Posts: 16119
Location: the Arizona desert

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:16 pm Post subject:

Cusi10 wrote:

so that they pass on geno and he falls to us so we can take him.

And frees up Albert.
_________________

mike23md

stchamp98

Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 55189
Location: Havre, Montana

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:21 pm Post subject:

DirtyDez wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

Still don't know who else KC could take over Geno at #1...

Let Albert walk as an UFA and take Joeckel. That'd be my guess.

That would be great for us for a number of different reasons. Don't see it happening though. KC already has a good Tackle they should keep him.

Ya but cutting those players opens up 2 more holes that Kansas City will need to spend money to fill.

DirtyDez

Joined: 15 Oct 2010
Posts: 16119
Location: the Arizona desert

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:35 pm Post subject:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

Still don't know who else KC could take over Geno at #1...

Let Albert walk as an UFA and take Joeckel. That'd be my guess.

That would be great for us for a number of different reasons. Don't see it happening though. KC already has a good Tackle they should keep him.

Ya but cutting those players opens up 2 more holes that Kansas City will need to spend money to fill.

They can replace those positions by a fraction of the cost. Tyson Jackson alone has a 17M salary next year.
_________________

mike23md

stchamp98

Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 55189
Location: Havre, Montana

Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:48 pm Post subject:

DirtyDez wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

stchamp98 wrote:

DirtyDez wrote:

Still don't know who else KC could take over Geno at #1...

Let Albert walk as an UFA and take Joeckel. That'd be my guess.

That would be great for us for a number of different reasons. Don't see it happening though. KC already has a good Tackle they should keep him.

Ya but cutting those players opens up 2 more holes that Kansas City will need to spend money to fill.

They can replace those positions by a fraction of the cost. Tyson Jackson alone has a 17M salary next year.

If only the Chiefs actually freed up 17 mill by cutting him him. But they don't. They free up about 9 and with starting 3-4 end salaries sitting around 4-5 mill, you've saved about 4 million by cutting Jackson and that's IF you sign an average player for right at last year's market value, which has disadvantages and may not even be done. It might not be what Kansas City even wants to do, especially since you already floated Dorsey as a possibility to leave as well and losing 2 starting ends in 1 year is certainly not a glorious idea.

Display posts from previous:

       FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Arizona Cardinals All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 9, 10, 11  Next

Page 10 of 11

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum