| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
GOGRIESE
Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Posts: 14638
Location: Use to live in Chicago Now Im in Austin Texas
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:30 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Madmike90 wrote: | | DaMike wrote: | | That's not at all how you create a big board. You create a big board based off of how you view players. If you view Ogletree as a 1st round pick then you put him down as a 1st round pick. If you have him as a 2nd you put him as a 2nd. You don't create a big board based off of your assumptions of how other teams view a player. |
I disagree…IMO you have to have every eventuality covered…you have to have a general big board of where you feel guys rank…personally I feel there will be plenty of teams who do view him as a 1st round pick at this point…then you have to have a big board based on your beliefs of who the best players are then one consisting of positional need vs. BPA…I always feel the more info you can compile the better a decision you can make…for example I remember watching a video about the Giants draft last season because Marc Ross was in the frame to be our new GM and I wanted to see how the guy worked and the Giants had 4 white boards going on how players were being viewed. |
This would be correct.
_________________
^^ props to Ty on the sig 
War room link
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=512157 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaMike
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 3348
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Madmike90 wrote: | | DaMike wrote: | | That's not at all how you create a big board. You create a big board based off of how you view players. If you view Ogletree as a 1st round pick then you put him down as a 1st round pick. If you have him as a 2nd you put him as a 2nd. You don't create a big board based off of your assumptions of how other teams view a player. |
I disagree…IMO you have to have every eventuality covered…you have to have a general big board of where you feel guys rank…personally I feel there will be plenty of teams who do view him as a 1st round pick at this point…then you have to have a big board based on your beliefs of who the best players are then one consisting of positional need vs. BPA…I always feel the more info you can compile the better a decision you can make…for example I remember watching a video about the Giants draft last season because Marc Ross was in the frame to be our new GM and I wanted to see how the guy worked and the Giants had 4 white boards going on how players were being viewed. |
I understand what you'r saying. But that's not a "big board". Teams don't list all players. Of course all teams have an understanding of other teams needs and top players at positions and scheme fit that they don't want. I think we may just be splitting hairs though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
