NFL Forum :: - Report: Jennings not expecting GB return in '13

Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

FAQ Register Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in

FootballsFuture.com Home

Report: Jennings not expecting GB return in '13
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 16, 17, 18 Next

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

justo

Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9086
Location: Hood River, Oregon

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:08 pm Post subject:

I Am Rodgers wrote:

I think its more likely we trade Finley than Jennings.

EDIT: Thought you said tag. :votes Justis is stupid:
_________________

on Tretter:

McThreadski wrote:

I would just cut him. What is the point of keeping him? We took a flyer on him anyway and he has an Ivy League education. Just let the guy live his life

Terranimal

Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 254
Location: Wisconsin

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:23 pm Post subject:

finally caught up on local Pack news stuff. We are currently only 7 mil under the cap.

ChaRisMa

Joined: 08 Mar 2007
Posts: 5331

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:39 am Post subject:

Terranimal wrote:

finally caught up on local Pack news stuff. We are currently only 7 mil under the cap.

2012, yes. 2013???
_________________

Ted Thompson wrote:

I'm new school.

Santana Dotson wrote:

"I've always told people that you had your mom and dad looking out for your best interests, and then you had Reggie White.

justo

Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9086
Location: Hood River, Oregon

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:48 am Post subject:

ChaRisMa wrote:

Terranimal wrote:

finally caught up on local Pack news stuff. We are currently only 7 mil under the cap.

2012, yes. 2013???

Caps roll over now, right?
_________________

on Tretter:

McThreadski wrote:

I would just cut him. What is the point of keeping him? We took a flyer on him anyway and he has an Ivy League education. Just let the guy live his life

spilltray

Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 8650
Location: Green Bay, WI

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:54 am Post subject:

justo wrote:

ChaRisMa wrote:

Terranimal wrote:

finally caught up on local Pack news stuff. We are currently only 7 mil under the cap.

2012, yes. 2013???

Caps roll over now, right?

Up to a certain point yes and I'm pretty sure 7 mil is under that cap.

Then individual contracts coming off the books, guys like Jennings, Finley, Woodson, or Driver could reduce that number to. After that guys with potential for extension like Rodgers, Raji, and Matthews current cap number as well.

That would be a list of the most useful information IMO. I'm sure it's all out there but it would be nice to keep all of that info on some sort of forum resource maybe.

Any ambitious volunteers?
_________________

Wilfred wrote:

Memory is like the Packers when they are behind by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter... It comes back.

justo

Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9086
Location: Hood River, Oregon

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:56 am Post subject:

spilltray wrote:

justo wrote:

ChaRisMa wrote:

Terranimal wrote:

finally caught up on local Pack news stuff. We are currently only 7 mil under the cap.

2012, yes. 2013???

Caps roll over now, right?

I'm down. Do we know our dead cap numbers right meow? Who are we still paying off?
_________________

on Tretter:

McThreadski wrote:

I would just cut him. What is the point of keeping him? We took a flyer on him anyway and he has an Ivy League education. Just let the guy live his life

justo

Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9086
Location: Hood River, Oregon

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 1:14 am Post subject:

Question: one time escalator clause. Is it exactly what it sounds like? Should I assume players do workouts/get roster bonuses/hit incentives?
_________________

on Tretter:

McThreadski wrote:

I would just cut him. What is the point of keeping him? We took a flyer on him anyway and he has an Ivy League education. Just let the guy live his life

Terranimal

Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 254
Location: Wisconsin

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 1:53 am Post subject:

justo wrote:

ChaRisMa wrote:

Terranimal wrote:

finally caught up on local Pack news stuff. We are currently only 7 mil under the cap.

2012, yes. 2013???

Caps roll over now, right?

yes it rolls over but the cap isn't expected to go up much.....

One thought found interesting in the WSJ...they spoke of Hawk gone next year and giving Jones a new contract, as he would be cheaper and plays all 3 downs, whereas hawk comes out on passing downs. that would open up some money also. but what got me thinking is if they go to get rid of him (he's approaching the 30 mark) maybe they could use him in a trade to move up in some round of the draft?

justo

Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9086
Location: Hood River, Oregon

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 1:56 am Post subject:

Terranimal wrote:

justo wrote:

ChaRisMa wrote:

Terranimal wrote:

finally caught up on local Pack news stuff. We are currently only 7 mil under the cap.

2012, yes. 2013???

Caps roll over now, right?

We'd be paying Hawk 1.6 million a year for three years to not be a Packer, though.
_________________

on Tretter:

McThreadski wrote:

I would just cut him. What is the point of keeping him? We took a flyer on him anyway and he has an Ivy League education. Just let the guy live his life

Terranimal

Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 254
Location: Wisconsin

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:39 am Post subject:

justo wrote:

Terranimal wrote:

justo wrote:

ChaRisMa wrote:

Terranimal wrote:

finally caught up on local Pack news stuff. We are currently only 7 mil under the cap.

2012, yes. 2013???

Caps roll over now, right?

We'd be paying Hawk 1.6 million a year for three years to not be a Packer, though.

Not sure myself. the article only said he's due 5.45 mil in salary and bonuses next year....

justo

Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9086
Location: Hood River, Oregon

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:43 am Post subject:

Terranimal wrote:

justo wrote:

Terranimal wrote:

justo wrote:

ChaRisMa wrote:

Terranimal wrote:

finally caught up on local Pack news stuff. We are currently only 7 mil under the cap.

2012, yes. 2013???

Caps roll over now, right?

We'd be paying Hawk 1.6 million a year for three years to not be a Packer, though.

Not sure myself. the article only said he's due 5.45 mil in salary and bonuses next year....

I got 6.5 not including workout or roster bonuses
_________________

on Tretter:

McThreadski wrote:

I would just cut him. What is the point of keeping him? We took a flyer on him anyway and he has an Ivy League education. Just let the guy live his life

Terranimal

Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 254
Location: Wisconsin

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:26 am Post subject:

justo wrote:

Terranimal wrote:

justo wrote:

Terranimal wrote:

justo wrote:

ChaRisMa wrote:

Terranimal wrote:

finally caught up on local Pack news stuff. We are currently only 7 mil under the cap.

2012, yes. 2013???

Caps roll over now, right?

We'd be paying Hawk 1.6 million a year for three years to not be a Packer, though.

Not sure myself. the article only said he's due 5.45 mil in salary and bonuses next year....

I got 6.5 not including workout or roster bonuses

Well the WSJ article came from Pete Dougherty of the GBPG, so he is usually really accurate....it's one of those articles that runs State wide even though it originated at the GB press gazzette.

palmy50

Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 12534

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:36 am Post subject:

Not sure this second level group is in a place where they can give away a talent like Hawk. Just too many things none of us know right now with that group. Think you might be able to pull it off if both Bishop and Smith come back healthy. Still would be a high risk cut at this point. Hard to give away the things you trust! If nothing else, you know Hawk is going to show up for work every day.
_________________

justo

Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9086
Location: Hood River, Oregon

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:40 am Post subject:

Terranimal wrote:

justo wrote:

Terranimal wrote:

justo wrote:

Terranimal wrote:

justo wrote:

ChaRisMa wrote:

Terranimal wrote:

finally caught up on local Pack news stuff. We are currently only 7 mil under the cap.

2012, yes. 2013???

Caps roll over now, right?

We'd be paying Hawk 1.6 million a year for three years to not be a Packer, though.

Not sure myself. the article only said he's due 5.45 mil in salary and bonuses next year....

I got 6.5 not including workout or roster bonuses

Well the WSJ article came from Pete Dougherty of the GBPG, so he is usually really accurate....it's one of those articles that runs State wide even though it originated at the GB press gazzette.

4.9 base, 8 million signing bonus (/5) is 1.6, (6.5), +300,000 roster bonus, 250,000 workout bonus according to this:
http://www.rotoworld.com/teams/contracts/nfl/gb/
_________________

on Tretter:

McThreadski wrote:

I would just cut him. What is the point of keeping him? We took a flyer on him anyway and he has an Ivy League education. Just let the guy live his life

HyponGrey

Joined: 23 Jun 2012
Posts: 1885
Location: Mount Laurel, NJ

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:46 am Post subject:

Terranimal wrote:

This is where injuries bite us in the tush. Our back-ups come in and show that they are serviceable, upping the price come contract time.
_________________

Kal-El wrote:

Going by that list, it seems pedophilia is very "in" right now.

Display posts from previous:

       FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 16, 17, 18  Next

Page 5 of 18

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum