Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Jets (6-7) @ Titans (4-9) MNF.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Tennessee Titans
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who wins?
Titans
83%
 83%  [ 10 ]
Jets
16%
 16%  [ 2 ]
Total Votes : 12

Author Message
TitanLegend


Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 3950
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mesa_Titan wrote:
titansNvolsR#1 wrote:
Also, I was pretty drunk at that point, but did I see a triple option play called on 3rd and short and Locker pitch it back 10 yards? Yeah.... let's not do that anymore.


Yup. I about put my fist through my TV.

I can't stand the dumbassery we have for coaches.


The play was fine. Had Locker kept the ball, it was a first down.

Blaming a perfectly fine play call when execution is the problem is probably our season in a nutshell.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ttitansfan4life


Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 25069
Location: Delaware
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 3:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TitanLegend wrote:
Mesa_Titan wrote:
titansNvolsR#1 wrote:
Also, I was pretty drunk at that point, but did I see a triple option play called on 3rd and short and Locker pitch it back 10 yards? Yeah.... let's not do that anymore.


Yup. I about put my fist through my TV.

I can't stand the dumbassery we have for coaches.


The play was fine. Had Locker kept the ball, it was a first down.

Blaming a perfectly fine play call when execution is the problem is probably our season in a nutshell.


It was a dumb play call. It was 3rd and 1. No need to do anything dumb like that. Run the ball with Quinn with a FB dive or run the ball up the middle with CJ.
_________________
Adopt-A-Titan:
Bishop Sankey
DaQuan Jones
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TitanLegend


Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 3950
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ttitansfan4life wrote:
TitanLegend wrote:
Mesa_Titan wrote:
titansNvolsR#1 wrote:
Also, I was pretty drunk at that point, but did I see a triple option play called on 3rd and short and Locker pitch it back 10 yards? Yeah.... let's not do that anymore.


Yup. I about put my fist through my TV.

I can't stand the dumbassery we have for coaches.


The play was fine. Had Locker kept the ball, it was a first down.

Blaming a perfectly fine play call when execution is the problem is probably our season in a nutshell.


It was a dumb play call. It was 3rd and 1. No need to do anything dumb like that. Run the ball with Quinn with a FB dive or run the ball up the middle with CJ.


It was a play call that would have got a first down if executed properly. Nothing dumb about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
titans0021


Moderator
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 26795
Location: Props to Smack on the sig
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?

More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back.
_________________

2014 Adopt-a-Titans
1. Justin Hunter, WR - 12 receptions, 237 yards, 1 touchdown
2. Brian Schwenke, C.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
TitanLegend


Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 3950
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

titans0021 wrote:
Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?

More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back.


I'm not sure. But I trust Munch and Matthews enough for them to know where they fit best. Maybe Velasco is the most athletic, for pulling purposes?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
titansNvolsR#1


Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Posts: 12289
Location: Kuwait City
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TitanLegend wrote:
titans0021 wrote:
Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?

More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back.


I'm not sure. But I trust Munch and Matthews enough for them to know where they fit best. Maybe Velasco is the most athletic, for pulling purposes?


Wyatt said they are moving Velasco back to C and putting DeVan at G. Our coaches are complete imbeciles.
_________________
My Student wrote:
Give your girlfriend my number, Mr. Garrett. I may be 12, but she deserves a real man. Not someone that gives homework in Math and Science the same night.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TitanLegend


Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 3950
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

titansNvolsR#1 wrote:
TitanLegend wrote:
titans0021 wrote:
Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?

More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back.


I'm not sure. But I trust Munch and Matthews enough for them to know where they fit best. Maybe Velasco is the most athletic, for pulling purposes?


Wyatt said they are moving Velasco back to C and putting DeVan at G. Our coaches are complete imbeciles.


Yeah doesn't make any sense then.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Flylow


Joined: 01 Feb 2011
Posts: 153
Location: Nashville, TN
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

titans0021 wrote:
Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?

More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back.



The reason why Velasco was at G and Matthews at C is due to the fact Matthews best position is C. As to why Velasco didn't slide over to C when Matthews went down, I have no idea and honestly I don't think our coaching staff does either.


Does anyone know how serious Matthews injury was?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
lamont


Joined: 01 Feb 2008
Posts: 3894
Location: tennessee
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Flylow wrote:
titans0021 wrote:
Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?

More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back.



The reason why Velasco was at G and Matthews at C is due to the fact Matthews best position is C. As to why Velasco didn't slide over to C when Matthews went down, I have no idea and honestly I don't think our coaching staff does either.


Does anyone know how serious Matthews injury was?


Sprained ankle. He got rolled up on in the pile.
_________________

**The #1 reason the Titans are my favorite team is #9. -- R.I.P Steve "Air" McNair**
Shout out to NS922 on da sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
s_camp


Joined: 10 Dec 2010
Posts: 2945
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 7:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TitanLegend wrote:
titans0021 wrote:
Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?

More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back.


I'm not sure. But I trust Munch and Matthews enough for them to know where they fit best. Maybe Velasco is the most athletic, for pulling purposes?


No way, did you see him trying to block in space last night? If he's the best we've got then we need to take those plays completely out of the book.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Titans fan 617


Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 10075
Location: BeanTown
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

s_camp wrote:
TitanLegend wrote:
titans0021 wrote:
Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?

More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back.


I'm not sure. But I trust Munch and Matthews enough for them to know where they fit best. Maybe Velasco is the most athletic, for pulling purposes?


No way, did you see him trying to block in space last night? If he's the best we've got then we need to take those plays completely out of the book.


After last night my vote is for Roos as our best blocker in space
_________________

Sig by daboyle250

TITANIA FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS
*2011

Shaun Phillips: 8 Tackles 5 Assist 1 Sack

Ropati Pitoitua: 9 Tackles 4 Assist 1 Sack
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mesa_Titan


Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 55794
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Titans fan 617 wrote:
s_camp wrote:
TitanLegend wrote:
titans0021 wrote:
Am I the only one who is absolutely baffled as to how we have managed our offensive line injuries?

More specifically, why is it that Fernando Velasco was moved to guard? He has chemistry with Jake and is clearly our best option there, I don't know why Matthews took over at C and when he went down, I simply am completely confused as to why DeVan, who has primarily been a G in his career, played C instead of Velasco just sliding back.


I'm not sure. But I trust Munch and Matthews enough for them to know where they fit best. Maybe Velasco is the most athletic, for pulling purposes?


No way, did you see him trying to block in space last night? If he's the best we've got then we need to take those plays completely out of the book.


After last night my vote is for Roos as our best blocker anywhere


fify
_________________

mission27 wrote:
Mesa_Titan is God.

#JDI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TitanLegend


Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Posts: 3950
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Our offensive line was doing really well/gelling together as the year went on. Roos bounced back from a rough start. Stewart continued his success. Hutchinson was great. Velasco played very well at center. Harris was average, but not a weakpoint.

Then everything just imploded thanks to injuries.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MdTitansFan56


Joined: 31 Jul 2011
Posts: 1445
Location: Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I felt as though Lutui was an upgrade over Harris at RG. Not sure on Velasco as I didn't get to watch all of our games but if CJ's production was any indicator then yes our Oline began to gel and got better with age. Then again not sure if it was that or the sub par competition
_________________

1. Alex Morgan 2.San Antonio Spurs 3. Chicago White Sox 4. Ohio State 5. Buckeyes 6. Philadelphia Flyers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TitanSS


Joined: 07 Jan 2007
Posts: 3072
Location: My house
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

14 Total penalties. A large sum of those were momemtum and drive stoppers, a few of them extending the drive for the Jets on third down.

5 forced turnovers and ZERO points off turnovers. Nearly every one of the interceptions put us at the 50 or inside and we didn't even come away with a field goal. Partially do to nasty penalties described above.

10 punts.. ...... .......

The team looks like they are on their own out there and even though they got the win, they looked embarassing on national TV during Monday Night Football.

It's looking like Munchak may not be back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Tennessee Titans All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14
Page 14 of 14

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group