| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SnA ExclusiVe 
Joined: 01 Jun 2011 Posts: 10584 Location: Spokane, WA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dcarey20
Joined: 15 Feb 2006 Posts: 7179
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Love it. Kind of surprised too. Figured we might be past the point of no return given our history and the fact he was visiting other teams. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SnA ExclusiVe 
Joined: 01 Jun 2011 Posts: 10584 Location: Spokane, WA
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| dcarey20 wrote: | | Love it. Kind of surprised too. Figured we might be past the point of no return given our history and the fact he was visiting other teams. |
Rivers must've scared him away with his facial expressions _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hemm68
Joined: 24 Apr 2009 Posts: 371 Location: the other frozen tundra
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I hope I'm wrong but my prediction is he doesn't make it to the second year of this contract. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MLBeast 52 
Joined: 13 Mar 2013 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I don't expect him to see year 2, but he'll be useful next year. I doubt he got a great offer from anyone, otherwise he would have signed earlier. He's a useful stopgap and one which the team can afford. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coordinator0
Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 5873
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Meh. Hopefully he wasn't too costly. The only other OL I could see them bringing in now is a veteran center to compete with Gradkowski and Jensen. They're pretty set otherwise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BaltimoreTerp 

Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 24816 Location: Brooklyn, New York
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Waaat. As far as getting what he wanted, goes to show again that Ozzie works this stuff better than anyone else.
But I'm skeptical about the move itself. I just don't trust the guy. Would have preferred Starks among FA tackles, but I guess we'll see what happens. _________________ "The really important kind of freedom involves attention, and awareness, and discipline, and effort, and being able truly to care about other people and to sacrifice for them, over and over, in myriad petty little unsexy ways, every day.” |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mancunian Raven
Joined: 09 Oct 2012 Posts: 511
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Make all of the money performance related, and the Ravens will have a solid LT for as long as they want.
This is a surprise though, because I felt sure that the Chargers would offer him more than the Ravens would be prepared to. Their current Tackles are a couple of air-filled tube dudes.
This gives the Ravens time to either identify a guy on the roster who can develop to play LT, Osemele, Wagner, Gaines, or find a guy in the draft next year. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sp6488 
Joined: 14 Mar 2005 Posts: 6230 Location: MD
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BaltimoreTerp wrote: | Waaat. As far as getting what he wanted, goes to show again that Ozzie works this stuff better than anyone else.
But I'm skeptical about the move itself. I just don't trust the guy. Would have preferred Starks among FA tackles, but I guess we'll see what happens. |
"Right player, right price." _________________
| Tzimisce wrote: | I'm sorry you're drowning in a sea of delusion.
I won't be sorry when the Ravens finish 8-8. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coordinator0
Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 5873
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quote: | Aaron Wilson @RavensInsider 3h
Bryant McKinnie's two-year, $7 million contract includes incentive clauses and a signing bonus, per source |
That seems a bit on the high side. Factoring in the cap room needed to sign the rookies as well as McKinnie's deal should take up just about all of Baltimore's current available cap space. They'll get more though when Pollard's June 1st designation comes into effect. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bmorecareful 
Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| coordinator0 wrote: | | Quote: | Aaron Wilson @RavensInsider 3h
Bryant McKinnie's two-year, $7 million contract includes incentive clauses and a signing bonus, per source |
That seems a bit on the high side. Factoring in the cap room needed to sign the rookies as well as McKinnie's deal should take up just about all of Baltimore's current available cap space. They'll get more though when Pollard's June 1st designation comes into effect. |
I think the plan is to start him this year so to be honest that's on the cheap side for a starting left tackle. Not to mention its a Max 7 million dollar contract so he has to play very well to get the whole seven. Similar to Jacoby's deal last year if he's on the roster year two it means he probably outplayed his contract or at least met the maximum expectations. If that ends up being the case I can live with that |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BaltimoreTerp 

Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 24816 Location: Brooklyn, New York
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Incentives are probably going to be based on games started. And if he's starting, he's probably playing decently enough. The $7 million number doesn't mean anything to me, but I'm curious to see what the cap numbers look like. The structure means a lot, if it's backloaded without guarantees then basically we're taking him on without any risk, with him only earning the money if he plays well enough to stay on the roster. _________________ "The really important kind of freedom involves attention, and awareness, and discipline, and effort, and being able truly to care about other people and to sacrifice for them, over and over, in myriad petty little unsexy ways, every day.” |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coordinator0
Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 5873
|
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I'm not penciling McKinnie in as the starting LT yet. As much as I don't like it Osemele will probably still get a shot there in training camp. Oher's probably in the conversation too. Like I've said all along I can stomach McKinnie being re-signed if it means Osemele is kept at LG. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BaltimoreTerp 

Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Posts: 24816 Location: Brooklyn, New York
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
McKinnie is the default starter. There's no way they're bringing him back with the thought that they want him to compete for the spot with the guy they preferably want starting at LG next to him.
If McKinnie shows up out of shape or gets injured, then I still think Oher gets the first crack at LT, regardless of what Ozzie may have said pre-draft. I'd be surprised if we see KO at left tackle at all in 2013. Maybe the year after if we don't re-sign Oher, but for the time being he's pretty comfortably entrenched at guard. _________________ "The really important kind of freedom involves attention, and awareness, and discipline, and effort, and being able truly to care about other people and to sacrifice for them, over and over, in myriad petty little unsexy ways, every day.” |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coordinator0
Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 5873
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I agree that it's most like that McKinnie is the LT but after what happened last season I'm not ruling anything out. It'll be interesting to see if the hiring of Juan Castillo will have any noticeable effect on the offensive line even though he was hired as the run game coordinator. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|