| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| QB you would trade down for |
| Alex Smith-SF |
|
50% |
[ 8 ] |
| Michael Vick-PHI |
|
18% |
[ 3 ] |
| Matt Flynn-SEA |
|
6% |
[ 1 ] |
| Kirk Cousins-WAS |
|
18% |
[ 3 ] |
| Tim Tebow-NYJ |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Brock Osweiler- DEN |
|
6% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 16 |
|
| Author |
Message |
JustPlainNasty
Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 6363
Location: Las Vegas
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:47 am Post subject: QB options for 2013 |
 |
|
|
Obviously primary need is settling on a QB.
Problem is no college Qb has stepped up to justify the value of Top 10 pick let alone the #1 overall for this years draft.
If an offer for the #1 pick all with similar compensation value came from one of the teams associated with these QB's which would you be most interested in. (Realizing Denver is a very unlikely option but just threw it out there because potential of Osweiler may be higher than any Qb's available in this years draft.)
Also figuring that a possible late 1st or early 2nd Qb selection is a likelihood in this scenario.
_________________
| Dcash4 wrote: |
...you have a forum resume? |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Buckweath
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 800
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Geno Smith is easily worth the #1 overall pick. At this point, I don't believe you can't win a SB at all with any of the QBs you listed so the only good option is to draft the best QB prospect available with our 1st round pick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OILCHIEFS
Joined: 02 Feb 2011
Posts: 1301
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I would still rather go with Geno but if i had to pick one of those QB's it would be Alex smith. He's essentially Cassel, but a lot better. He would provide the veteran leadership and he is the most known commodity. We could always hope Manziel comes out next year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eric Berry
Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Posts: 378
Location: Lexington, KY
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| OILCHIEFS wrote: | | I would still rather go with Geno but if i had to pick one of those QB's it would be Alex smith. He's essentially Cassel, but a lot better. He would provide the veteran leadership and he is the most known commodity. We could always hope Manziel comes out next year. |
Think back to the days of Alex Smith without Harbaugh. No no and no.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arrowhead86
Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 3766
Location: Kansas City
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
There should be a none option. I actually like Smith but none of these options and draft choice accompanying them will make me trade down. I'm taking QB #1 overall if thats where we pick and rolling with Quinn/Stanzi as the back ups.
_________________
In Andy We Trust!
WCO + 3-4 in KC
Erhardt: Throw to score! Run to win! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
simonwayne
Joined: 11 Sep 2011
Posts: 7341
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Geno.
Man would it suck to beat the Raiders next week and then have them take Geno in the draft.
_________________
| dolphan9954 wrote: | | Enjoy your second round exit. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HiccupGuy
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 1700
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I wouldn't trade for any of those guy. I don't care who is on the trading block. We need and have to draft a QB. No ifs, and, or buts about it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mikek163
Joined: 24 Nov 2008
Posts: 4672
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I know what you mean OP and I think about this every damn day. I really don't think there is a qb in this draft (unless T Wilson shows he played behind a bad line and no receiving threats) that's worth taking #1 or even #2. I think what we need to do at this point is take the BPA with our top 3 pick and then trade back up in the first to grab the qb that we want. If the qb gets taken prior to us moving up, then there's nothing we can do about that. Mike Vick - Hassleback - Alex Smith are all viable options I guess at this point in time.
_________________
Knock knock. Who's there? The guy that finished second! The guy that finished second who? Exactly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bigschmadt00
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 10553
Location: Seeing what condition my condition is in
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'd trade for Alex Smith, but not #1 overall, even if I'm getting SF's 1st in return. That would be valuing Smith as like 2-3 1st round picks.
I would however trade our top of the round 4th rounder for him, to then give us flexibility should we not have a real good feel for a QB at #1 overall.
_________________
^ryknowssd on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Buckweath
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 800
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Can't believe there are Chiefs fans who have anything else in mind than to draft the best Qb prospect at #1 overall.... Clearly some of you are as bad at analyzing football as Romeo at coaching. IT has to be a Qb at #1, no ifs, buts, it has to be. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mikek163
Joined: 24 Nov 2008
Posts: 4672
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Buckweath wrote: | | Can't believe there are Chiefs fans who have anything else in mind than to draft the best Qb prospect at #1 overall.... Clearly some of you are as bad at analyzing football as Romeo at coaching. IT has to be a Qb at #1, no ifs, buts, it has to be. |
If there are no qbs worth drafting then why waste 5-6 years with him?
_________________
Knock knock. Who's there? The guy that finished second! The guy that finished second who? Exactly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chiefs_5627
Joined: 26 Dec 2007
Posts: 3009
Location: Genoville
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Mikek163 wrote: | | Buckweath wrote: | | Can't believe there are Chiefs fans who have anything else in mind than to draft the best Qb prospect at #1 overall.... Clearly some of you are as bad at analyzing football as Romeo at coaching. IT has to be a Qb at #1, no ifs, buts, it has to be. |
If there are no qbs worth drafting then why waste 5-6 years with him? |
Imo people are moreso caught in the fact that there's not a Luck or RG3. There are very talented prospects coming out this year and unless they destroy themselves at the combine I don't see why we should just flat out pass on a guy like say Geno because we're haggling over the matter of a handful of spots. Our biggest flaw on this team is Qb so Imo that only reinforces my mindset that I'm willing to take a top 10 Qb in the top 3.
_________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kf5WYigZHME |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EB29
Joined: 02 Aug 2012
Posts: 480
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Mikek163 wrote: | | Buckweath wrote: | | Can't believe there are Chiefs fans who have anything else in mind than to draft the best Qb prospect at #1 overall.... Clearly some of you are as bad at analyzing football as Romeo at coaching. IT has to be a Qb at #1, no ifs, buts, it has to be. |
If there are no qbs worth drafting then why waste 5-6 years with him? |
Why would a bad QB get 5 years?
_________________
JTagg7754 with the Dope Sig ^^
| Jon Gruden wrote: | | Great Snatch catch ability there by Nicks |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mikek163
Joined: 24 Nov 2008
Posts: 4672
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| EB29 wrote: | | Mikek163 wrote: | | Buckweath wrote: | | Can't believe there are Chiefs fans who have anything else in mind than to draft the best Qb prospect at #1 overall.... Clearly some of you are as bad at analyzing football as Romeo at coaching. IT has to be a Qb at #1, no ifs, buts, it has to be. |
If there are no qbs worth drafting then why waste 5-6 years with him? |
Why would a bad QB get 5 years? |
Ask Mark Sanchez.
_________________
Knock knock. Who's there? The guy that finished second! The guy that finished second who? Exactly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
starbarkc
Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 669
Location: Austin, TX
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Flacco just lost his o-coordinator. He wasn't very happy when they fired Zorn a few years ago, I assume he won't like this change either given the fact that one of the reasons cited for Cam's dismissal was Flacco's lack of development. He will be a FA at the end of the season.
He's better than Cassel. Low bar, I know, but maybe we sign him AND draft a qb. OMG crazy!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
