Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

QB options for 2013
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Kansas City Chiefs
View previous topic :: View next topic  

QB you would trade down for
Alex Smith-SF
50%
 50%  [ 8 ]
Michael Vick-PHI
18%
 18%  [ 3 ]
Matt Flynn-SEA
6%
 6%  [ 1 ]
Kirk Cousins-WAS
18%
 18%  [ 3 ]
Tim Tebow-NYJ
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Brock Osweiler- DEN
6%
 6%  [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 16

Author Message
JustPlainNasty


Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 7090
Location: Las Vegas
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:47 am    Post subject: QB options for 2013 Reply with quote

Obviously primary need is settling on a QB.
Problem is no college Qb has stepped up to justify the value of Top 10 pick let alone the #1 overall for this years draft.

If an offer for the #1 pick all with similar compensation value came from one of the teams associated with these QB's which would you be most interested in. (Realizing Denver is a very unlikely option but just threw it out there because potential of Osweiler may be higher than any Qb's available in this years draft.)

Also figuring that a possible late 1st or early 2nd Qb selection is a likelihood in this scenario.
_________________
Dcash4 wrote:


...you have a forum resume?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Buckweath


Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 864
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Geno Smith is easily worth the #1 overall pick. At this point, I don't believe you can't win a SB at all with any of the QBs you listed so the only good option is to draft the best QB prospect available with our 1st round pick.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OILCHIEFS


Joined: 02 Feb 2011
Posts: 1469
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would still rather go with Geno but if i had to pick one of those QB's it would be Alex smith. He's essentially Cassel, but a lot better. He would provide the veteran leadership and he is the most known commodity. We could always hope Manziel comes out next year.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Eric Berry


Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Posts: 381
Location: Lexington, KY
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OILCHIEFS wrote:
I would still rather go with Geno but if i had to pick one of those QB's it would be Alex smith. He's essentially Cassel, but a lot better. He would provide the veteran leadership and he is the most known commodity. We could always hope Manziel comes out next year.


Think back to the days of Alex Smith without Harbaugh. No no and no.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Arrowhead86


Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 4095
Location: Kansas City
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There should be a none option. I actually like Smith but none of these options and draft choice accompanying them will make me trade down. I'm taking QB #1 overall if thats where we pick and rolling with Quinn/Stanzi as the back ups.
_________________
In Andy We Trust!
WCO + 3-4 in KC
Erhardt: Throw to score! Run to win!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
simonwayne


Joined: 11 Sep 2011
Posts: 14735
Location: United States
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Geno.

Man would it suck to beat the Raiders next week and then have them take Geno in the draft.
_________________
Sigbet with El Ramster; OKC wins title = I win. IND wins title = he wins.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HiccupGuy


Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 1959
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wouldn't trade for any of those guy. I don't care who is on the trading block. We need and have to draft a QB. No ifs, and, or buts about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mikek163


Joined: 24 Nov 2008
Posts: 5471
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know what you mean OP and I think about this every damn day. I really don't think there is a qb in this draft (unless T Wilson shows he played behind a bad line and no receiving threats) that's worth taking #1 or even #2. I think what we need to do at this point is take the BPA with our top 3 pick and then trade back up in the first to grab the qb that we want. If the qb gets taken prior to us moving up, then there's nothing we can do about that. Mike Vick - Hassleback - Alex Smith are all viable options I guess at this point in time.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bigschmadt00


Moderator
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 10842
Location: 500 miles East of Sack City!
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd trade for Alex Smith, but not #1 overall, even if I'm getting SF's 1st in return. That would be valuing Smith as like 2-3 1st round picks.

I would however trade our top of the round 4th rounder for him, to then give us flexibility should we not have a real good feel for a QB at #1 overall.
_________________

^ryknowssd on the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Buckweath


Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 864
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can't believe there are Chiefs fans who have anything else in mind than to draft the best Qb prospect at #1 overall.... Clearly some of you are as bad at analyzing football as Romeo at coaching. IT has to be a Qb at #1, no ifs, buts, it has to be.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mikek163


Joined: 24 Nov 2008
Posts: 5471
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Buckweath wrote:
Can't believe there are Chiefs fans who have anything else in mind than to draft the best Qb prospect at #1 overall.... Clearly some of you are as bad at analyzing football as Romeo at coaching. IT has to be a Qb at #1, no ifs, buts, it has to be.


If there are no qbs worth drafting then why waste 5-6 years with him?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chiefs_5627


Joined: 26 Dec 2007
Posts: 3052
Location: Genoville
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mikek163 wrote:
Buckweath wrote:
Can't believe there are Chiefs fans who have anything else in mind than to draft the best Qb prospect at #1 overall.... Clearly some of you are as bad at analyzing football as Romeo at coaching. IT has to be a Qb at #1, no ifs, buts, it has to be.


If there are no qbs worth drafting then why waste 5-6 years with him?


Imo people are moreso caught in the fact that there's not a Luck or RG3. There are very talented prospects coming out this year and unless they destroy themselves at the combine I don't see why we should just flat out pass on a guy like say Geno because we're haggling over the matter of a handful of spots. Our biggest flaw on this team is Qb so Imo that only reinforces my mindset that I'm willing to take a top 10 Qb in the top 3.
_________________


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kf5WYigZHME
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EB29


Joined: 02 Aug 2012
Posts: 608
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mikek163 wrote:
Buckweath wrote:
Can't believe there are Chiefs fans who have anything else in mind than to draft the best Qb prospect at #1 overall.... Clearly some of you are as bad at analyzing football as Romeo at coaching. IT has to be a Qb at #1, no ifs, buts, it has to be.


If there are no qbs worth drafting then why waste 5-6 years with him?


Why would a bad QB get 5 years?
_________________

JTagg7754 with the Dope Sig ^^

Jon Gruden wrote:
Great Snatch catch ability there by Nicks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mikek163


Joined: 24 Nov 2008
Posts: 5471
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EB29 wrote:
Mikek163 wrote:
Buckweath wrote:
Can't believe there are Chiefs fans who have anything else in mind than to draft the best Qb prospect at #1 overall.... Clearly some of you are as bad at analyzing football as Romeo at coaching. IT has to be a Qb at #1, no ifs, buts, it has to be.


If there are no qbs worth drafting then why waste 5-6 years with him?


Why would a bad QB get 5 years?


Ask Mark Sanchez.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
starbarkc


Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 736
Location: Austin, TX
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Flacco just lost his o-coordinator. He wasn't very happy when they fired Zorn a few years ago, I assume he won't like this change either given the fact that one of the reasons cited for Cam's dismissal was Flacco's lack of development. He will be a FA at the end of the season.

He's better than Cassel. Low bar, I know, but maybe we sign him AND draft a qb. OMG crazy!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Kansas City Chiefs All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group