| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ch8878
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 2620
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:08 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Sounds like Richard Seymour, Tommy Kelly, and Desmond Bryant will all be gone looking like the Raiders won't have a choice now, but to take Star Lotulelei, Johnathan Hankins or Sheldon Richardson.
Whenever a team goes into the draft with a need usually = fail
Also the Raiders will be right at the CAP, but after cutting Tommy Kelly ($6.5), Darrius Heyward-Bey ($7.72 million), Richard Seymour (not sure his number), Shane Lechler via free agent ($3.8 million), and restructure Palmer's ($13 million).
I don't expect any Free Agency splash this year Reggie will be bargain shopping again.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bo_Spice
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 9687
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Where are you seeing that we're not going to bring back Desmond Bryant?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ch8878
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 2620
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Bo_Spice wrote: | | Where are you seeing that we're not going to bring back Desmond Bryant? |
Hes a free agent, and he has said hes "testing the market" Raiders want him back at a "bargain price" hes as good as gone.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bo_Spice
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 9687
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ch8878 wrote: | | Hes a free agent, and he has said hes testing the market Raiders want him back at a "bargain price" hes as good as gone. |
Do you have a link?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ch8878
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 2620
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Bo_Spice wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | Hes a free agent, and he has said hes testing the market Raiders want him back at a "bargain price" hes as good as gone. |
Do you have a link? |
Hes not going to be a back-up on a 4-12 team when he can be a back-up on a contender.
What do you mean link ?
Players eligible for unrestricted free agency: T Khalif Barnes, DT Desmond Bryant, G Cooper Carlisle, DE Andre Carter, LB Omar Gaither, S Matt Giordano, RB Mike Goodson, WR Derek Hagan, CB Joselio Hanson, P Shane Lechler, QB Matt Leinart, S Mike Mitchell, TE Brandon Myers, DT Richard Seymour, DE Matt Shaughnessy, CB Shawntae Spencer, LB Philip Wheeler
Players eligible for restricted free agency: CB Phillip Adams
Exclusive-rights free agents: LB Kaelin Burnett, WR Duke Calhoun, CB Coye Francies, T Zach Hurd, C/G Alex Parsons, CB Brandian Ross, RB Jeremy Stewart
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
big_palooka
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 22970
Location: ATL
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ch8878 wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | Hes a free agent, and he has said hes testing the market Raiders want him back at a "bargain price" hes as good as gone. |
Do you have a link? |
Hes not going to be a back-up on a 4-12 team when he can be a back-up on a contender.
What do you mean link ?
|
That's the worst reasoning I've ever heard. So we can just make stuff up now? That's happening?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oakdb36
Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Posts: 14696
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| big_palooka wrote: | | So we can just make stuff up now? That's happening? |
Yes. Welcome to the forum.
_________________
| Plush wrote: | | Papa was a trolling stone |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
big_palooka
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 22970
Location: ATL
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| oakdb36 wrote: | | big_palooka wrote: | | So we can just make stuff up now? That's happening? |
Yes. Welcome to the forum. |
Touché.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ch8878
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 2620
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| big_palooka wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | Hes a free agent, and he has said hes testing the market Raiders want him back at a "bargain price" hes as good as gone. |
Do you have a link? |
Hes not going to be a back-up on a 4-12 team when he can be a back-up on a contender.
What do you mean link ?
|
That's the worst reasoning I've ever heard. So we can just make stuff up now? That's happening? |
How is it making stuff up when hes a free agent ?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
big_palooka
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 22970
Location: ATL
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ch8878 wrote: | | big_palooka wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | Hes a free agent, and he has said hes testing the market Raiders want him back at a "bargain price" hes as good as gone. |
Do you have a link? |
Hes not going to be a back-up on a 4-12 team when he can be a back-up on a contender.
What do you mean link ?
|
That's the worst reasoning I've ever heard. So we can just make stuff up now? That's happening? |
How is it making stuff up when hes a free agent ? |
You said it "sounds like Bryant will be gone". Then your reasoning is he won't want to be a backup on a 4-12 team. So there is no "sound" just you guessing and giving an opinion. An opinion that has no validation.
So there is ZERO truth or validity to your statement.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ch8878
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 2620
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| big_palooka wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | big_palooka wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | Hes a free agent, and he has said hes testing the market Raiders want him back at a "bargain price" hes as good as gone. |
Do you have a link? |
Hes not going to be a back-up on a 4-12 team when he can be a back-up on a contender.
What do you mean link ?
|
That's the worst reasoning I've ever heard. So we can just make stuff up now? That's happening? |
How is it making stuff up when hes a free agent ? |
You said it "sounds like Bryant will be gone". Then your reasoning is he won't want to be a backup on a 4-12 team. So there is no "sound" just you guessing and giving an opinion. An opinion that has no validation.
So there is ZERO truth or validity to your statement. |
There is "ZERO" truth or validity he'll be back as well its all speculation.
_________________
Last edited by ch8878 on Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:49 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bo_Spice
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 9687
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ch8878 wrote: | | Hes a free agent, and he has said hes "testing the market" Raiders want him back at a "bargain price" hes as good as gone. |
He even went out of his way to make up a quote.
Apparently he also has inside information in the Raiders front office and knows what type of deal we're going to offer Bryant.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
big_palooka
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 22970
Location: ATL
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Bo_Spice wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | Hes a free agent, and he has said hes "testing the market" Raiders want him back at a "bargain price" hes as good as gone. |
He even went out of his way to make up a quote.
Apparently he also has inside information in the Raiders front office and knows what type of deal we're going to offer Bryant. |
Exactly. Just making it up. No validity and zero truth.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ZoomWaffle
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 5468
Location: United Kingdom
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| big_palooka wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | big_palooka wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | Hes a free agent, and he has said hes testing the market Raiders want him back at a "bargain price" hes as good as gone. |
Do you have a link? |
Hes not going to be a back-up on a 4-12 team when he can be a back-up on a contender.
What do you mean link ?
|
That's the worst reasoning I've ever heard. So we can just make stuff up now? That's happening? |
How is it making stuff up when hes a free agent ? |
You said it "sounds like Bryant will be gone". Then your reasoning is he won't want to be a backup on a 4-12 team. So there is no "sound" just you guessing and giving an opinion. An opinion that has no validation.
So there is ZERO truth or validity to your statement. |
Not only that, but if Seymour and Kelly are both gone, Bryant would likely get more playing time here than as a backup elsewhere. Even if we were to draft a good DT, there is still one spot open. Even if we were to sign another DT or move Houston inside, Bryant will get a lot of action somewhere along the line.
_________________
Silver&Black88 on the sig
| La_Vader wrote: | | I wouldn't trade Pryor for any prospect in this years draft. Quote me on that |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ch8878
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 2620
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Bo_Spice wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | Hes a free agent, and he has said hes "testing the market" Raiders want him back at a "bargain price" hes as good as gone. |
He even went out of his way to make up a quote.
Apparently he also has inside information in the Raiders front office and knows what type of deal we're going to offer Bryant. |
Do you ever stop trolling ?
Your saying I'm "making up things" because I won't show you where I read it go read yourself there is only so many Raiders blogs.
_________________
Last edited by ch8878 on Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:21 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
