| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
TomRalph
Joined: 03 Apr 2009
Posts: 5816
Location: Leeds, England
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 6:46 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Because none of our Wide Receivers run a sub 4.40 40, they all suck.
Seems legit.
_________________
| Jmacz008 (With the 32nd Pick of the 2014 NFL Draft) wrote: | | ...the New England Rutgers select, Rutgers Rutgers, Rutgers from Rutgers |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tzimisce
Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 40626
Location: Slowly coming to terms with the inevitable
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
This is pure schmuck bait. The Pats have the #1 offense in the league. Who cares if the receivers don't pass the NBT boner test?
_________________
https://twitter.com/Zealotry_Metal |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nihc
Joined: 13 Sep 2011
Posts: 2011
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tzimisce wrote: | | This is pure schmuck bait. The Pats have the #1 offense in the league. Who cares if the receivers don't pass the NBT boner test? |
NBT's boner? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
terbo559
Joined: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 2742
Location: California
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tzimisce wrote: | | This is pure schmuck bait. The Pats have the #1 offense in the league. Who cares if the receivers don't pass the NBT boner test? |
lmfao that made me laugh
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NextBigThing
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 15886
Location: Tuck Rule FTW
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tzimisce wrote: | | This is pure schmuck bait. The Pats have the #1 offense in the league. Who cares if the receivers don't pass the NBT boner test? |
Quit playing. I am pretty sure you all cared when we lost to the Jets in 2010, and to the giants in last years Super Bowl? True or false?
If we lose a playoff game because yet again, the safeties play up while the LB's blitz, and we have no receiver who can get vertical, do not cry about it. I'm taking care of the crying right now! And hope someone hears it and answers it to make NBT feel better!
"Hi Mr. Belichick! I'd love to come to Foxboro for a try out....I would guess 4.43 ish. I'm 6'4. You know I live in the gym. 153 touchdowns, actually, not 150. Yeah yeah yeah I will STFU for yall. Aight, I'll be there in a bit."
_________________
The King Does As He Pleases
| NFLfan511 wrote: | | NBT, I made an account here just because of you. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ChazStandard
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 2118
Location: The bandwagon, hop on up!
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Just to throw some love NBT's way...I get where he's coming from. Obviously our offense is fine, better than fine even, but I watch Vincent Jackson and Megatron and Marshall out muscling CBs and plucking jump-balls out of the air and I get a little jealous.
It would be nice to have a pure size/speed WR.
_________________
| ConnPatFan wrote: | | We always assumed BB was playing chess...In fact he is playing Monopoly, and can now put up hotels on Rutgers Secondary. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
24isthelaw
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 5181
Location: Where the Patriots are
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NextBigThing wrote: | | Tzimisce wrote: | | This is pure schmuck bait. The Pats have the #1 offense in the league. Who cares if the receivers don't pass the NBT boner test? |
Quit playing. I am pretty sure you all cared when we lost to the Jets in 2010, and to the giants in last years Super Bowl? True or false?
If we lose a playoff game because yet again, the safeties play up while the LB's blitz, and we have no receiver who can get vertical, do not cry about it. I'm taking care of the crying right now! And hope someone hears it and answers it to make NBT feel better!
"Hi Mr. Belichick! I'd love to come to Foxboro for a try out....I would guess 4.43 ish. I'm 6'4. You know I live in the gym. 153 touchdowns, actually, not 150. Yeah yeah yeah I will STFU for yall. Aight, I'll be there in a bit." |
We lost the super bowl because our defense couldn't get a key stop. Not because of a lack of a better wide receiver.
_________________
Adopt-a-Patriot: Marcus Forston - Practice squad (0 tackles, 0 sacks) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NextBigThing
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 15886
Location: Tuck Rule FTW
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
A better wide receiver, and the defense is never in that position.
_________________
The King Does As He Pleases
| NFLfan511 wrote: | | NBT, I made an account here just because of you. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dhunt2402
Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 16672
Location: The District
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 24isthelaw wrote: | | We lost the super bowl because our defense couldn't get a key stop. Not because of a lack of a better wide receiver. |
I'm sorry. There's no way you can put that loss on the defense. They held the Giants in check long enough to give our #1 ranked offense the ball with the lead with a chance to run out the clock and clinch the win.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mcmurtry86
Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Posts: 16196
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NextBigThing wrote: | | A better wide receiver, and the defense is never in that position. |
2007 says hello |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dhunt2402
Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 16672
Location: The District
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mcmurtry86 wrote: | | NextBigThing wrote: | | A better wide receiver, and the defense is never in that position. |
2007 says hello |
The offense did its job on their final drive in 07. Moss caught the go-ahead TD.
Not making any judgments on the full game performance from the offense (which was underwhelming to say the least), but they did their job in crunch time, which is more than you could say for the 2011 offense.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mcmurtry86
Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Posts: 16196
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| dhunt2402 wrote: | | mcmurtry86 wrote: | | NextBigThing wrote: | | A better wide receiver, and the defense is never in that position. |
2007 says hello |
The offense did its job on their final drive in 07. Moss caught the go-ahead TD.
Not making any judgments on the full game performance from the offense (which was underwhelming to say the least), but they did their job in crunch time, which is more than you could say for the 2011 offense. |
1. I'm considering the game as a whole, not just "crunch time." The 2007 offense was almost a shell of its regular season self in the playoffs
2. NBT's point was that with an elite WR, the Pats offense would be unstoppable in the playoffs - citing 2010 as an example. The 2007 offense was better than 2010 (and 2011 for that matter) and had Randy "Elite Hamstrings" Moss and STILL got shut down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ChazStandard
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 2118
Location: The bandwagon, hop on up!
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| dhunt2402 wrote: | | mcmurtry86 wrote: | | NextBigThing wrote: | | A better wide receiver, and the defense is never in that position. |
2007 says hello |
The offense did its job on their final drive in 07. Moss caught the go-ahead TD.
Not making any judgments on the full game performance from the offense (which was underwhelming to say the least), but they did their job in crunch time, which is more than you could say for the 2011 offense. |
Plus...Moss was open and a few inches from winning the game on the very last drive.
Hate thinking about that.
_________________
| ConnPatFan wrote: | | We always assumed BB was playing chess...In fact he is playing Monopoly, and can now put up hotels on Rutgers Secondary. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mcmurtry86
Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Posts: 16196
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ChazStandard wrote: | | dhunt2402 wrote: | | mcmurtry86 wrote: | | NextBigThing wrote: | | A better wide receiver, and the defense is never in that position. |
2007 says hello |
The offense did its job on their final drive in 07. Moss caught the go-ahead TD.
Not making any judgments on the full game performance from the offense (which was underwhelming to say the least), but they did their job in crunch time, which is more than you could say for the 2011 offense. |
Plus...Moss was open and a few inches from winning the game on the very last drive.
Hate thinking about that. |
Doesn't change the fact that the record-setting offense, with Randy Moss, was mostly shut down by a good but not historically great defense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tzimisce
Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 40626
Location: Slowly coming to terms with the inevitable
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
