| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| What do you make of the Madden Simulation? |
| It is wrong, Texans win big |
|
7% |
[ 2 ] |
| It is right on, Pats barely win |
|
29% |
[ 8 ] |
| Its not even close, Pats destroy texans |
|
55% |
[ 15 ] |
| It just missed it, Texans pull off a close one |
|
7% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 27 |
|
| Author |
Message |
kaz
Joined: 16 Jul 2011
Posts: 346
Location: Houston
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:28 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| lumberjackchris wrote: | | I really hope we come out throwing again, like yesterday. Get the safety out of the box then start running Arian and company. |
Seems like we come out throwing every game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lumberjackchris
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 3110
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kaz wrote: | | lumberjackchris wrote: | | I really hope we come out throwing again, like yesterday. Get the safety out of the box then start running Arian and company. |
Seems like we come out throwing every game. |
Maybe for the first play then run the ball get stuffed and be forced to punt...
I want a full series of passes with a run or 2 sprinkled in to keep them honest.
_________________
^Kempes on the sick sig^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lumberjackchris
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 3110
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 24isthelaw wrote: | | bunnyracin wrote: | | Did any of yal see the MNF promo tonight? G that was absolutely terrible. I can't remember what our promo was against the Jets but I hope ours isn't similar to this one. Hank Williams made MNF |
Just press mute. They usually don't look absolutely terrible.
| PAtexansFAN99 wrote: | That's what I like to hear  |
Heh. In case you can't tell, I don't feel good about this matchup.
The Pats are winning, but if you watch the games you'll see them consistently losing at the LOS on both sides of the ball, especially in pass protection and rushing the passer.
If they come out and win and handle you guys up front, I will believe this team has what it takes to go all the way. Until then, I see a team that has weapons and talent but also fundamental flaws (o-line/lack of vertical threats on offense, defensive linemen who pressure the qb/safeties on defense), and those warts get exposed in January. |
2 Words, Tom Brady. He makes up for alot.
_________________
^Kempes on the sick sig^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ConnPatFan
Joined: 02 Mar 2011
Posts: 230
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
So much comes down to health, if Gronk, at least one guard and maybe Jones plays near 100% I have confidence.
But assuming we have the same team that played the dolphins I can't see us winning |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NextBigThing
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 15886
Location: Tuck Rule FTW
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Game of the season thus far! Hopefully the good guys win! 
_________________
The King Does As He Pleases
| NFLfan511 wrote: | | NBT, I made an account here just because of you. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
24isthelaw
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 5175
Location: Where the Patriots are
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| lumberjackchris wrote: |
2 Words, Tom Brady. He makes up for alot. |
There's only so much he can do though. It'll be a great game for sure.
_________________
Adopt-a-Patriot: Marcus Forston - Practice squad (0 tackles, 0 sacks) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TGShabba
Joined: 20 Oct 2010
Posts: 496
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ConnPatFan wrote: | So much comes down to health, if Gronk, at least one guard and maybe Jones plays near 100% I have confidence.
But assuming we have the same team that played the dolphins I can't see us winning |
Gronk is still out for at least another two weeks. Jones should be back at full or nearly full strength. Hopefully Vollmer didn't suffer any setbacks on Sunday and Connolly can recover as well. I don't know where Mankins is with his injury.
Our line is completely bipolar. If they play like they did against Miami, this game could get ugly really quickly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jaytrajik
Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 13235
Location: Odessa, TX
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Brady at home, on Monday night, against our secondary?
Not gonna be a good look.
Patriots 34 - Texans 30
_________________
"Tackling is a lost art because thanks to the CBA, nobody can practice it anymore." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pastor Dillon
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 4467
Location: Mountain Home, Arkansas
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Here is an interesting note:
If the Texans were to win and the Ravens and Broncos were to lose, then we would have the #1 seed wrapped up....except for a tiny little detail: We still wouldnt have clinched the division unless the Titans beat the colts, now these are all very long odds
about the only one of them looking likely is the Redskins beating the Ravens
but assuming it does happen, what do we do for the last 3 weeks of the season? Buisness as usual or do we start to limit plays for guys like Foster and Johnson?
personally i would do everything i could to beat the colts, at least in the first meeting. The last thing we want to do is let them walk right into the playoffs with 2 victories over us
for the sake of our team, i hope we win but dont clinch #1 this week
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lumberjackchris
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 3110
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Maybe the NE fans can help with this, which end does Chandler Jones line up on?
I think we have a big problem with Wilfork against Myers, we all remember the Myers v. Jenkins game 
_________________
^Kempes on the sick sig^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mse326
Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Posts: 13513
Location: LORK on the sig
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| lumberjackchris wrote: | Maybe the NE fans can help with this, which end does Chandler Jones line up on?
I think we have a big problem with Wilfork against Myers, we all remember the Myers v. Jenkins game |
Wilfork is the penetrator that Jenkins is. Jenkins is a 1-tech, Wilfork is a 0-tech.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lumberjackchris
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 3110
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| mse326 wrote: | | lumberjackchris wrote: | Maybe the NE fans can help with this, which end does Chandler Jones line up on?
I think we have a big problem with Wilfork against Myers, we all remember the Myers v. Jenkins game |
Wilfork is the penetrator that Jenkins is. Jenkins is a 1-tech, Wilfork is a 0-tech. |
Isn't*?
_________________
^Kempes on the sick sig^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mse326
Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Posts: 13513
Location: LORK on the sig
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| lumberjackchris wrote: | | mse326 wrote: | | lumberjackchris wrote: | Maybe the NE fans can help with this, which end does Chandler Jones line up on?
I think we have a big problem with Wilfork against Myers, we all remember the Myers v. Jenkins game |
Wilfork is the penetrator that Jenkins is. Jenkins is a 1-tech, Wilfork is a 0-tech. |
Isn't*? |
Yes. My bad.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TGShabba
Joined: 20 Oct 2010
Posts: 496
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| lumberjackchris wrote: | Maybe the NE fans can help with this, which end does Chandler Jones line up on?
I think we have a big problem with Wilfork against Myers, we all remember the Myers v. Jenkins game |
Jones lines up on the right side, but has been flipped mid-game a small handful of times. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kenney
Joined: 24 Dec 2006
Posts: 11361
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'd rather face Edelman than Stallworth. Our secondary's issues are with speed (and size) stretching the field, not with smaller receivers running crossing routes.
Anyhow, we benefit greatly if Gronkowski is still out of this game.
_________________
Welcome to Houston, DeAndre Hopkins! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
