| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
khodder
Joined: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 52059
Location: New New York
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:25 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Maybe I am missing something but did Greene not fall down on the 1 yard line anyway?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Boise&cards Fan
Joined: 03 Dec 2010
Posts: 3194
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| khodder wrote: |
Maybe I am missing something but did Greene not fall down on the 1 yard line anyway? |
Yeah he did fall over on his own. Not sure why he be mad at Dockett. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
younggun1273
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 7285
Location: Queen Creek, AZ
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Boise&cards Fan wrote: | | khodder wrote: |
Maybe I am missing something but did Greene not fall down on the 1 yard line anyway? |
Yeah he did fall over on his own. Not sure why he be mad at Dockett. |
Greene did fall on his own. From what I gathered from that PFT article, Rhodes wanted Dockett to just let Greene go into the endzone, but Dockett was playing hard on that play and trying to make a stop, which would have effectively ended the game. Greene made the heady play to not go in the endzone, so it didn't matter in the end.
There is obviously more to this situation than what we know, certainly more than what I know, but that is the impression I got.
_________________
Justo on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
khodder
Joined: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 52059
Location: New New York
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| younggun1273 wrote: | Greene did fall on his own. From what I gathered from that PFT article, Rhodes wanted Dockett to just let Greene go into the endzone, but Dockett was playing hard on that play and trying to make a stop, which would have effectively ended the game. Greene made the heady play to not go in the endzone, so it didn't matter in the end.
There is obviously more to this situation than what we know, certainly more than what I know, but that is the impression I got. |
But the very play before that Greene is headed right into the endzone and who makes the tackle...Kerry Rhodes.
Groves and Dan Williams are also giving effort on that play too. Most of the defense is not, the secondary and Washington/Lenon in particular. It is tricky, you don't ever want to not give your best on the football field, especially when even if you let them score a KR TD is basically your only option.
If the rumors of Darnell spitting in the face of Rhodes is true Darnell needs to step up, be the bigger man, apologize and get back to work.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stchamp98
Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 55189
Location: Havre, Montana
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| iRobot wrote: | | Probably the reason why the front office talked to Horton. Probably about discipline for Dockett or worst case scenario to talk about David Carter and his progress if he can fill in for a traded Dockett for draft positioning. |
We can't trade Dockett. Money involved would be a serious set back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JohnnyV
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 2221
Location: Chicago, Illinois
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Kerry Rhodes doesn't need an attitude check, he needs a contract extension.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stchamp98
Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 55189
Location: Havre, Montana
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JohnnyV wrote: | | Kerry Rhodes doesn't need an attitude check, he needs a contract extension. |
I'd rather we let him walk. He'll be 31 next August in the final year of his current deal. When he steps on the field after a contract extension, he'll be 32. Signing guys in the their 30s to contract extensions really isn't a stepping stone to success. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
khodder
Joined: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 52059
Location: New New York
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stchamp98
Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 55189
Location: Havre, Montana
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Urban said Rhodes tweeted him quote "It never happened" about the spitting incident.
Hard to say if that's true or if he's just covering up something that's water under the bridge now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DirtyDez
Joined: 15 Oct 2010
Posts: 16124
Location: the Arizona desert
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| stchamp98 wrote: | | iRobot wrote: | | Probably the reason why the front office talked to Horton. Probably about discipline for Dockett or worst case scenario to talk about David Carter and his progress if he can fill in for a traded Dockett for draft positioning. |
We can't trade Dockett. Money involved would be a serious set back. |
His cap # is 6.5M next year. So 5M buyout saves nearly 2M plus we'd get a 3rd round pick? I'd do it... Plus we get out of the remaining 25M left on his deal.
The question is how much we'd get for him. Different situations but wasn't Boldin 30 when we got a 3rd/4th for him? I know we gave up a 5th but it was a good trade...
_________________
mike23md |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stchamp98
Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 55189
Location: Havre, Montana
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Dockett's cap number for 2012 doesn't mean anything. The figure for what we'd take on money wise if he's released or traded is a different formula altogether. Simply put, while we'd be off the book for his 2012 base salary (To my knowledge, there's no more guaranteed money on this contract) of around 4.5-5 million dollars whatever it may be, we're totally on the hook for the remainder of his prorated signing bonus because that signing bonus has already been physically paid to him. The remainder of his prorated signing bonus is something like 9.5 million dollars. That's what we'd be on the hook for, 9.5 million dollars which again is nearly 5 million additional cap dollars. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DirtyDez
Joined: 15 Oct 2010
Posts: 16124
Location: the Arizona desert
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Spotrac has his signing bonus paid off. Must be an error...
_________________
mike23md |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stchamp98
Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 55189
Location: Havre, Montana
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| They have it listed as an option bonus, which while true it technically isn't. It's a signing bonus for a player who signed an extension with years remaining. These bonuses are required to prorate as they are paid out in full to the player. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
younggun1273
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 7285
Location: Queen Creek, AZ
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Boise&cards Fan
Joined: 03 Dec 2010
Posts: 3194
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Mike Jurecki @mikejurecki
I’m hearing that Darnell Dockett has been fined six figures from the Cardinals organization, & could have a limited role vs. Seattle. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
