NFL Forum :: - NFL won't suspend Suh for low blow against Schaub

Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

FAQ Register Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in

FootballsFuture.com Home

NFL won't suspend Suh for low blow against Schaub
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Next

This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL News

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

diehardlionfan

Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 22006
Location: Ottawa

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:46 am Post subject:

JDLefebvre wrote:

tytalton wrote:

Quote:

Was the Schaub play "dirty?"

Sure - if you call getting dragged down by the OL dirty then yeah

No. That would be a penalty for holding.

Kicking a player is the dirty play.

I strongly disagree.

I don't view the play as dirty in the slightest. I don't believe for a minute there was intent to kick Schaub. His foot hit Schaub in an unfortunate area.

This forum has a determined negative view of Suh and one doesn't have to look very far to see it.

In a week full of other controversial plays the lack of threads about those players is interesting. Around here if Suh farts it gets a thread.
_________________

Sig by LionsFTW

To know what is right and not do it is the worst cowardice.

detfan782004

Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 40131
Location: Montana

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:50 am Post subject:

diehardlionfan wrote:

JDLefebvre wrote:

tytalton wrote:

Quote:

Was the Schaub play "dirty?"

Sure - if you call getting dragged down by the OL dirty then yeah

No. That would be a penalty for holding.

Kicking a player is the dirty play.

Fact that Bunkley played tonight and not really a peep reinforces this
_________________

FFMD II AGM- DETROIT LIONS

incognito_man

Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 26526
Location: Madison

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:13 am Post subject:

diehardlionfan wrote:

JDLefebvre wrote:

tytalton wrote:

Quote:

Was the Schaub play "dirty?"

Sure - if you call getting dragged down by the OL dirty then yeah

No. That would be a penalty for holding.

Kicking a player is the dirty play.

detfan782004

Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 40131
Location: Montana

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 2:21 am Post subject:

incognito_man wrote:

diehardlionfan wrote:

JDLefebvre wrote:

tytalton wrote:

Quote:

Was the Schaub play "dirty?"

Sure - if you call getting dragged down by the OL dirty then yeah

No. That would be a penalty for holding.

Kicking a player is the dirty play.

Bunkley gets nothing for KICK A GUY IN THE HEAD for sure intentionally......yep no bias

Rolling Eyes

_________________

FFMD II AGM- DETROIT LIONS

eagles101

Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 5997

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 7:17 am Post subject:

J Pep 4 Step wrote:

eagles101 wrote:

JDLefebvre wrote:

Eagles... he has a history of dirty play. Plain and simple.

.......i dont know if it shows up different on other people computers....but let me try again maybe.

suh has a history of dirty play. this is not what he has a history of. his dirty play and history do not correlate with this incident.

Please be patient. I am trying to understand this.

Was the Schaub play "dirty?"

i dont know. i dont think so. the only way its dirty is by intent. if he meant to do it then yes. if not then no.

what im saying is that his past history is not the same as this. he has a history of overly aggressive tackles and anger issues. this is not an issue of over aggression or anger.....its an issue of being plain cheap and dirty, which he does not have an issue of.
_________________

props to deadpulse

THE PACK MAN wrote:

Im not a homer, I said we would lose a game last year when all the analysts predicted us to go 16-0 halfway through the year.

w4rrior723

Joined: 27 Dec 2006
Posts: 4491

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:21 am Post subject:

I think his leg naturally flew in the direction towards Shaubs groin – but when he realized where it was going he definitely guided it and applied more force to it. Not really that big of a deal, but he deserves a fine for it IMO and I could understand if they suspended him for 1 game due to his track record.
_________________

DetroitSpirit

Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 3065
Location: Michigan

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:44 am Post subject:

detfan782004 wrote:

incognito_man wrote:

diehardlionfan wrote:

JDLefebvre wrote:

tytalton wrote:

Quote:

Was the Schaub play "dirty?"

Sure - if you call getting dragged down by the OL dirty then yeah

No. That would be a penalty for holding.

Kicking a player is the dirty play.

Bunkley gets nothing for KICK A GUY IN THE HEAD for sure intentionally......yep no bias

Rolling Eyes

But he hasn't done nothin before so assault is fine as a first act!!!
_________________

Vikefan79 wrote:

And you know what about the playoffs and/or quarterbacks being a Detroit fan?

Nsmith52188

Joined: 15 Nov 2012
Posts: 175

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:09 pm Post subject:

diehardlionfan wrote:

JDLefebvre wrote:

tytalton wrote:

Quote:

Was the Schaub play "dirty?"

Sure - if you call getting dragged down by the OL dirty then yeah

No. That would be a penalty for holding.

Kicking a player is the dirty play.

The only bias here is from you clueless Lion fans. Suh is a beast. But a total cheap shot artist. Frankly if you can't see that you're simply blinded by your fandom

DetroitSpirit

Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 3065
Location: Michigan

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:11 pm Post subject:

Nsmith52188 wrote:

diehardlionfan wrote:

JDLefebvre wrote:

tytalton wrote:

Quote:

Was the Schaub play "dirty?"

Sure - if you call getting dragged down by the OL dirty then yeah

No. That would be a penalty for holding.

Kicking a player is the dirty play.

The only bias here is from you clueless Lion fans. Suh is a beast. But a total cheap shot artist. Frankly if you can't see that you're simply blinded by your fandom

Just because you fling petty insults around doesn't make you right.
_________________

Vikefan79 wrote:

And you know what about the playoffs and/or quarterbacks being a Detroit fan?

skatebeanz

Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Posts: 17513
Location: Jamison. on the Sweet-sig.

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:30 pm Post subject:

incognito_man wrote:

Everyone in the country minus the jury thought OJ was guilty too. That is until a guy came out last week and admitted he killed OJ's wife.

Guilty by public court =/= guilty.
_________________

detfan782004 wrote:

If he [Ansah] doesn't exceed career sacks this year I'm calling it a bust, all 4.5

Nsmith52188

Joined: 15 Nov 2012
Posts: 175

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:32 pm Post subject:

skatebeanz wrote:

incognito_man wrote:

Everyone in the country minus the jury thought OJ was guilty too. That is until a guy came out last week and admitted he killed OJ's wife.

Guilty by public court =/= guilty.

...WTF? Just because he was acquitted doesn't mean he didn't actually kill his wife and her bf. This is the dumbest analogy of all time

DetroitSpirit

Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 3065
Location: Michigan

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:35 pm Post subject:

Nsmith52188 wrote:

skatebeanz wrote:

incognito_man wrote:

Everyone in the country minus the jury thought OJ was guilty too. That is until a guy came out last week and admitted he killed OJ's wife.

Guilty by public court =/= guilty.

...WTF? Just because he was acquitted doesn't mean he didn't actually kill his wife and her bf. This is the dumbest analogy of all time

Did you just read the first sentence and rage reply?
_________________

Vikefan79 wrote:

And you know what about the playoffs and/or quarterbacks being a Detroit fan?

FourThreeMafia

Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 40598
Location: East of Sixburgh

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:37 pm Post subject:

[quote="skatebeanz"]

incognito_man wrote:

You're mistaken if you think only this forum thinks Suh is guilty. Virtually the entire country does (minus Nebraska and Michigan).

So yes, there is some bias involved. Either everyone who didn't cheer for him at some point is biased or those that root for his team are.

I know what's more likely.[/quote]Everyone in the country minus the jury thought OJ was guilty too. That is until a guy came out last week and admitted he killed OJ's wife.

Guilty by public court =/= guilty.

LMAO....I suggest you learn more about that case before you try to use it as a comparison.
_________________

cluelessororke wrote:

I am going to laugh in your face when they don't even sniff WR until day three of the draft

Still waiting for your laugh....

skatebeanz

Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Posts: 17513
Location: Jamison. on the Sweet-sig.

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:40 pm Post subject:

Nsmith52188 wrote:

skatebeanz wrote:

incognito_man wrote:

Everyone in the country minus the jury thought OJ was guilty too. That is until a guy came out last week and admitted he killed OJ's wife.

Guilty by public court =/= guilty.

...WTF? Just because he was acquitted doesn't mean he didn't actually kill his wife and her bf. This is the dumbest analogy of all time

Uh Everyone said OJ killed Nicole but Glen Rogers came out and admitted he killed her and has prove he did. But everyone swore OJ killed her.

http://laist.com/2012/11/21/serial_killer_on_death_row_says_oj.php
_________________

detfan782004 wrote:

If he [Ansah] doesn't exceed career sacks this year I'm calling it a bust, all 4.5

skatebeanz

Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Posts: 17513
Location: Jamison. on the Sweet-sig.

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:41 pm Post subject:

FourThreeMafia wrote:

skatebeanz wrote:

incognito_man wrote:

Everyone in the country minus the jury thought OJ was guilty too. That is until a guy came out last week and admitted he killed OJ's wife.
Guilty by public court =/= guilty.

LMAO....I suggest you learn more about that case before you try to use it as a comparison.

Uh what are you talking about?
_________________

detfan782004 wrote:

If he [Ansah] doesn't exceed career sacks this year I'm calling it a bust, all 4.5

Display posts from previous:

       FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL News All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Page 9 of 10

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum