| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MalcolmBrown
Joined: 26 Jul 2011
Posts: 250
Location: 2012 Adopt a Brownie: Ben Watson (2012 Stats: 39 Rec, 390 Yds, 3 TD, 10 YPC, 19 1DN)
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:55 pm Post subject: Week 13: Ghost of Art Modell @ Ghost of Al Davis (GDT) |
 |
|
|
I liked the idea of the no lulz from last week, but I'm a guy who's always smiling and laughing, so I couldn't help it.
The Browns are going going,
back back,
to Cali Cali.
Discuss.
_________________
"You mean...this ain't Malcolm Browns car...? ...Damn...my bad..."
Reppin in Athens, Ohio AKA South Cleveland
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brownsfan1710
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Posts: 1529
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I have a terrible, terrible feeling about this game. They've got a lot of speed, and we, well, don't. That said, we should be able to run all over them, and Richardson should be a HUGE part of this game with Colt dinking an dunking it down the field. I have a feeling he'll break 100 on the ground, and 75 through the air. Colt will manage the game, and once again, the D will have to win it. I think we'll get a lot of heat on Palmer, and we'll pick him off once. Stop their running game, limit our turnovers, and this is a win.
Browns 24 Raiders 20. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nugpimpen
Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 12165
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The outcome should be...
Browns 27 and Raiders 21
That means it will be...
Raiders 17 and Browns 13
Bad feeling
I really hope Weeden will start. I know some like Colt better, but these next 5 games are the ones that allow us to see if we have a legit QB going forward.
_________________
| hornbybrown wrote: | | We also have the highest amount per capita of Jedi in New Zealand. I'm one. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TeHDruiD
Joined: 01 Jan 2010
Posts: 6738
Location: Canton, OH
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The Raiders can't play defense. They can't rush the passer, stop the pass or stop the run. I feel like we're going to absolutely punish them Sunday. I'm thinking 34-13 Browns
Trent is going to go for over 150 yards on the ground, no doubt in my mind |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BigMoneysProtege
Joined: 09 Mar 2005
Posts: 1566
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
It seems like it has been forever since we really up and whooped off on any team. I would love to see a 30-10 drubbing where I can finally relax for once in the 4th Q and not drink so much. This game looks like a very winnable contest, but I have my fears. We are the Browns, afterall. We also have not won on the road this year 
_________________
Never looking back, or too far in front of me.
The present is a gift, and I just wanna be. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dropkick_pride
Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Posts: 9442
Location: C-bus
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
This could be a statement game for the Browns...
_________________
| Thomas5737 wrote: | | EZ's acceptance of farting on nuns does not necessarily reflect the views of this sub forum. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bruceb
Joined: 15 Dec 2006
Posts: 5328
Location: Rocky River, OH
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I might be completely wrong about this but I seem to recall we haven't done too well in OAK.
That being said, I think we will take this game going away.
Wouldn't mind seeing McCoy in at all, if for no other reason than to see how he does in "cockpit" he didn't have that was built for and handed to Weeden.
_________________
Everything happens exactly the way it is supposed to happen...otherwise, it would happen some other way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hornbybrown
Joined: 25 Jan 2008
Posts: 12825
Location: dunedin new zealand
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bruceb wrote: | I might be completely wrong about this but I seem to recall we haven't done too well in OAK.
That being said, I think we will take this game going away.
Wouldn't mind seeing McCoy in at all, if for no other reason than to see how he does in "cockpit" he didn't have that was built for and handed to Weeden. |
I want to see what McCoy can do as well.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KamTrus20
Joined: 17 Nov 2009
Posts: 4772
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
We have a 12 game losing streak on the road and we are a team that wins games we have no business winning then turning right around and losing the games we have no business losing.
Raiders 23 Browns 20
_________________
Jamison on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
candyman93
Joined: 02 Dec 2009
Posts: 34851
Location: Adopt a Brownie 2012: TJ Ward
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Why do we always play Oakland in Oakland?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NickZambo
Joined: 03 Mar 2009
Posts: 1388
Location: Pittsburgh Browns Backin'
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TeHDruiD wrote: | The Raiders can't play defense. They can't rush the passer, stop the pass or stop the run. I feel like we're going to absolutely punish them Sunday. I'm thinking 34-13 Browns
Trent is going to go for over 150 yards on the ground, no doubt in my mind |
Our Browns have yet to have a blowout win this year. This week, I think it happens. If McFadden is out, and Weeden plays, we should take our momentum to Oakland and crush.
_________________
Skipping over bruceb's posts since 2012 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Thomas5737
Joined: 23 Dec 2009
Posts: 1854
Location: WV
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| hornbybrown wrote: | | bruceb wrote: | I might be completely wrong about this but I seem to recall we haven't done too well in OAK.
That being said, I think we will take this game going away.
Wouldn't mind seeing McCoy in at all, if for no other reason than to see how he does in "cockpit" he didn't have that was built for and handed to Weeden. |
I want to see what McCoy can do as well. |
I already posted it in the Weeden thread. 16-27 174 yards 1TD 1Int. Colt isn't physically built to be a starting QB in Cleveland, he doesn't have the physical tools to overcome the weather conditions. He should play okay in Oakland though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wolfhunt
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 813
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Thomas5737 wrote: |
I already posted it in the Weeden thread. 16-27 174 yards 1TD 1Int. Colt isn't physically built to be a starting QB in Cleveland, he doesn't have the physical tools to overcome the weather conditions. He should play okay in Oakland though. |
This is probably one of the dumbest comments I have seen in a long time on this board and there are quite a few to choose from. The only thing you are doing is repeating the same old talking points.
The actual truth is nobody has any idea what either of these QB's can really do. Colt was saddled with a horrible team around him and Weeds is a rookie making a lot of rookie mistakes.
_________________
| ACDC_Rocks024 wrote: | | when you are rebuilding a franchise, the first thing you start with isn't O lineman |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bruceb
Joined: 15 Dec 2006
Posts: 5328
Location: Rocky River, OH
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Wolfhunt wrote: | | Thomas5737 wrote: |
I already posted it in the Weeden thread. 16-27 174 yards 1TD 1Int. Colt isn't physically built to be a starting QB in Cleveland, he doesn't have the physical tools to overcome the weather conditions. He should play okay in Oakland though. |
This is probably one of the dumbest comments I have seen in a long time on this board and there are quite a few to choose from. The only thing you are doing is repeating the same old talking points.
The actual truth is nobody has any idea what either of these QB's can really do. Colt was saddled with a horrible team around him and Weeds is a rookie making a lot of rookie mistakes. |
There career records, production aren't that different, and McCoy had no supporting cast.
_________________
Everything happens exactly the way it is supposed to happen...otherwise, it would happen some other way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Thomas5737
Joined: 23 Dec 2009
Posts: 1854
Location: WV
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bruceb wrote: | | Wolfhunt wrote: | | Thomas5737 wrote: |
I already posted it in the Weeden thread. 16-27 174 yards 1TD 1Int. Colt isn't physically built to be a starting QB in Cleveland, he doesn't have the physical tools to overcome the weather conditions. He should play okay in Oakland though. |
This is probably one of the dumbest comments I have seen in a long time on this board and there are quite a few to choose from. The only thing you are doing is repeating the same old talking points.
The actual truth is nobody has any idea what either of these QB's can really do. Colt was saddled with a horrible team around him and Weeds is a rookie making a lot of rookie mistakes. |
There career records, production aren't that different, and McCoy had no supporting cast. |
I've seen Colt throw in the snow/wind/rain. He can't. He has small hands. Would he get better than what he had shown thus far? Almost certainly, unless the concussion stunted his QB growth. I think Colt could be successful starting in New Orleans, not great, but pretty good. In Cleveland, I don't think he ever gets better than average. I like him, but I don't believe he should have a future in Cleveland as the starter.
You can still judge throws (not neccessarily results) with a poor supporting cast. That's what I'm doing. Colt was just okay with the checkdown passes, and that was the majority of his throws. That may have come from a poor supporting cast, but he also struggled to hit receivers wide open running down the field when it did arise. Weeden is more accurate with the check downs. He is more accurate with the deep throws. He is more likely to throw into triple coverage. Both have flaws, but i'd take my chances on Weeden. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
