| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
CBears019 
Joined: 03 Aug 2008 Posts: 14765 Location: Iowa City, IA
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 7:43 pm Post subject: Bears vs. Seahawks GDT - :( no bueno |
|
|
|
 _________________ Martellus Bennet highlight video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lP8fHN53t0
Last edited by CBears019 on Sun Dec 02, 2012 5:54 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CBears019 
Joined: 03 Aug 2008 Posts: 14765 Location: Iowa City, IA
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quote: | | Per Schefter, Sherman and Browner are appealing the bans and "insist they are innocent." The substance for which Sherman and Browner were popped is unclear, but they are integral to Seattle's defense as physical press cornerbacks who make it incredibly difficult for opposing receivers to run pass routes. Sherman is more a shutdown-caliber corner. Browner is 6-foot-4 and more of a ballhawk. We should know more by early this week. |
_________________ Martellus Bennet highlight video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lP8fHN53t0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Madmike90 
Joined: 25 Jan 2009 Posts: 18563 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The question is can they play during the appeal?...if not it's a huge break for us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pigsooie5 
Joined: 17 Nov 2007 Posts: 3058 Location: LOBO NATION, New Mexico
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Madmike90 wrote: | | The question is can they play during the appeal?...if not it's a huge break for us. |
That's a good question... I can't seem to find much about it. Normally though when involving PED's its an automatic suspension until an appeal is upheld. _________________
| WindyCity wrote: | | I was actually driving Nick Fairley and Mikel Leshoure to their NA meetings when Suh side swipped our car and threatened us. | IN EMERY, WE TRUST |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blkwdw13 
Joined: 21 Aug 2009 Posts: 1065
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
It's already been reported by sites that they are able to play until the appeal. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WindyCity 
Joined: 26 Jun 2009 Posts: 6831
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| blkwdw13 wrote: | | It's already been reported by sites that they are able to play until the appeal. |
They can play but they said that the appeal could happen this week.
If they delay it they would be suspended for the playoffs which no one wants. _________________
Thanks to chisox |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blkwdw13 
Joined: 21 Aug 2009 Posts: 1065
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| WindyCity wrote: | | blkwdw13 wrote: | | It's already been reported by sites that they are able to play until the appeal. |
They can play but they said that the appeal could happen this week.
If they delay it they would be suspended for the playoffs which no one wants. |
If the appeal gets delayed or pushed back a week(most likely) then they are suspended for the final four games of the season and can play in the play offs if the Seahawks make it. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Superman(DH23) 
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 16408 Location: Abdi on the sick sig
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
the appeal has to be heard w/in 10 days of the initial suspension, so it should happen this week, and unless its a starcaps type situation, that decision will be final. _________________
| OneBadCat wrote: | | Ahah Okay first of all Gamble was lost to IR this year but when healthy he proved to be 2nd only to Revis last season. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WindyCity 
Joined: 26 Jun 2009 Posts: 6831
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Superman(DH23) wrote: | | the appeal has to be heard w/in 10 days of the initial suspension, so it should happen this week, and unless its a starcaps type situation, that decision will be final. |
Home has it is Adderal which means their appeal will be rejected. _________________
Thanks to chisox |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Badger75
Joined: 08 Apr 2008 Posts: 5903
|
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Outstanding.
The NFL and the Olympics and FIFA are very slow getting around to being serious about drug testing. If the NFL wants a cleaner game get these guys off of stuff like this. HSers are doing it now. _________________ "I have to keep playing so people over 40 will have somebody to root for on Sunday afternoons." George Blanda who played until he was 46 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChicagoAl
Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 7059
|
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Madmike90 wrote: | | The question is can they play during the appeal?...if not it's a huge break for us. | Yes, they can. Remember the Williams Wall was suspended but fought the suspensions and eventually had the courts vacate them. They played the whole time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Superman(DH23) 
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 16408 Location: Abdi on the sick sig
|
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ChicagoAl wrote: | | Madmike90 wrote: | | The question is can they play during the appeal?...if not it's a huge break for us. | Yes, they can. Remember the Williams Wall was suspended but fought the suspensions and eventually had the courts vacate them. They played the whole time. | Actually the courts didn't vacate the suspensions, they reached a settlement w/ the NFL to reduce it to 2 games. Completely different situation however since the NFL was actually contacted as to whether or not it was ok to take and the players were told yes. _________________
| OneBadCat wrote: | | Ahah Okay first of all Gamble was lost to IR this year but when healthy he proved to be 2nd only to Revis last season. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChicagoAl
Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 7059
|
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Superman(DH23) wrote: | | ChicagoAl wrote: | | Madmike90 wrote: | | The question is can they play during the appeal?...if not it's a huge break for us. | Yes, they can. Remember the Williams Wall was suspended but fought the suspensions and eventually had the courts vacate them. They played the whole time. | Actually the courts didn't vacate the suspensions, they reached a settlement w/ the NFL to reduce it to 2 games. Completely different situation however since the NFL was actually contacted as to whether or not it was ok to take and the players were told yes. | They played during the appeal nonetheless. It was not resolved for a long time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Superman(DH23) 
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 16408 Location: Abdi on the sick sig
|
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ChicagoAl wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | ChicagoAl wrote: | | Madmike90 wrote: | | The question is can they play during the appeal?...if not it's a huge break for us. | Yes, they can. Remember the Williams Wall was suspended but fought the suspensions and eventually had the courts vacate them. They played the whole time. | Actually the courts didn't vacate the suspensions, they reached a settlement w/ the NFL to reduce it to 2 games. Completely different situation however since the NFL was actually contacted as to whether or not it was ok to take and the players were told yes. | They played during the appeal nonetheless. It was not resolved for a long time. | That wasn't the appeal, that was the courts, they received an injunction from a Minneapolis Judge (big surprise) while the case was being heard. The appeal, as I stated earlier, has to be heard w/in 10 days of the original notification. Sounds like their defense is simply "we didn't take anything". Which a and b samples both are tested before notification, so they have no chance w/ that defense. _________________
| OneBadCat wrote: | | Ahah Okay first of all Gamble was lost to IR this year but when healthy he proved to be 2nd only to Revis last season. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mudderfudder77
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 1292
|
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Superman(DH23) wrote: | | ChicagoAl wrote: | | Superman(DH23) wrote: | | ChicagoAl wrote: | | Madmike90 wrote: | | The question is can they play during the appeal?...if not it's a huge break for us. | Yes, they can. Remember the Williams Wall was suspended but fought the suspensions and eventually had the courts vacate them. They played the whole time. | Actually the courts didn't vacate the suspensions, they reached a settlement w/ the NFL to reduce it to 2 games. Completely different situation however since the NFL was actually contacted as to whether or not it was ok to take and the players were told yes. | They played during the appeal nonetheless. It was not resolved for a long time. | That wasn't the appeal, that was the courts, they received an injunction from a Minneapolis Judge (big surprise) while the case was being heard. The appeal, as I stated earlier, has to be heard w/in 10 days of the original notification. Sounds like their defense is simply "we didn't take anything". Which a and b samples both are tested before notification, so they have no chance w/ that defense. |
Just to add - The reason the Minnesota case was such a cluster-fuct for the NFL is because Minnesota had some very unique and unfortunate (for the NFL) laws regarding employer drug testing. _________________
2013 Draft - Go TE or go home. Yes, TE, even after signing Bennett. Vance McDonald is your huckleberry. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|