MARK MY WORDS!

Superman · Joined: 11 Feb 2005 Posts: 217

Mark Clayton will be a Cowboy. This is fact. you can all say no he wont, and ridicule me, but the truth is, he is a Parcells player, and is every bit as good as MW(but faster) or BE(but has better hands).
He is disciplined, has a great work ethic, and only wants to get better.

There, now you guys can tell me why i am wrong Very Happy

_________________
“I am in blood ... Stepped in so far that, should I wade no more, Returning were as tedious as go o’er”

thisnamesucks · Joined: 17 Feb 2005 Posts: 4834

he's too small and won't be there in round 2, better players at more glaring need positions will be there at 20
_________________

member#1877
Ware: 31 tackles, 21 ast, 11 sacks, 4 FF, 1 FR

GeorgiaBoy367 · Joined: 07 Feb 2005 Posts: 4840

this guy will not change a game he plays as well as terry glenn. which is good but not a #1 WR we need a #1 guy i dont care where we get him IMO for our system even Roddy White and troy Williamson are better

Nextyearfordaboyz · Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 16211

just like MW but 8 inches shorter... he is also 4 inches shorter than BE...

Those are both better WR than Clayton... Unless we trade for another late round 1 or something, i can't see us taking him

Soup Nazi · Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 1119 Location: ATX

_________________

plan9misfit · Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:47 am Post subject:

Aww Nazi, you're putting a picture of my hero in your posts now. LONG LIVE HOMER SIMPSON!!!!

DraftMattJones · Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Posts: 809 Location: NC

Matt Jones is a beast, We have Keyshaun, Terry, Quincy, Witten, and JJones. We can wait and get Matt Jones later and fix the D with the early picks.

cue1977 · Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 81

I have to agree with the idea of picking up someone like Matt Jones in the later rounds. He is huge and fast. He wouldn't be the answer this year or maybe next year, but he will be a big time match-up problem for any team we face. I like MW as much as anyone here EXCEPT Trojan, but I think we need defense more.

CTCowboysFan · Joined: 24 Dec 2004 Posts: 2586

That wasn't nice to copy my post except changing Mike Williams to Mark Clayton. I think the Cowboys will NOT take Clayton....too small played for Oklahoma...so *cough* overrated.

Battlelordz · Joined: 13 Jan 2005 Posts: 1701 Location: Houston, Tx

AmericasTeam · Joined: 09 Jan 2005 Posts: 1212

Soup, if you put that post up there because you think he's a "homer" then that was genius.

Soup Nazi · Joined: 30 Jan 2005 Posts: 1119 Location: ATX

rblevens · Joined: 16 Nov 2004 Posts: 4025 Location: Norman Oklahoma

Clayton is better than Williamson...

Williamson runs the 40 .05 seconds faster than Clayton...It takes .3 of a second to blink...

.05 isn't that much...

Clayton also has the best hands in the draft...The only bad thing is his height...

Good thing that the average CB is at/below 6 foot...Another good thing is Clayton has a pretty damn good vertical...38 inches...

His height might matter in the red zone, but MC plays in the slot. He will be the best slot receiver in the NFL in a few years if he is drafted by a team that utilizes the trips package...like Indy...or a team that changes to a pass happy offense...

I'm not being a homer, this stuff is true
_________________

JJones21 · Joined: 22 Feb 2005 Posts: 1759 Location: Delaware

i believe the offense is good at this point lets go after d this year then next year get offense because next year is the year in the draft!
_________________