| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 31554
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 7:53 pm Post subject: Rams release Brit Miller and activate C Scott Wells |
 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/jthom1/status/271021677985538048
| Quote: | | Rams release FB Brit Miller to make room for C Scott Wells on active roster. |
Scott Wells will be starting this week! Who else is excited?
Also, I'm assuming this means Terrance Ganaway will be our new starting FB?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
STLRamsFan99
Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Posts: 866
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:03 pm Post subject: Re: Rams release Brit Miller and activate C Scott Wells |
|
|
|
| jrry32 wrote: | https://twitter.com/jthom1/status/271021677985538048
| Quote: | | Rams release FB Brit Miller to make room for C Scott Wells on active roster. |
Scott Wells will be starting this week! Who else is excited?
Also, I'm assuming this means Terrance Ganaway will be our new starting FB? |
Great new getting the leader of our O-line back. I am excited to see him play again.
Do we even use a FB that much? I don'y remember seeing Miller on the field with the offense too much. Either way I like both moves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ajhicks11
Joined: 15 Jan 2010
Posts: 430
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
It will be wonderful to have Scott back. Haven't really been able to see what he brings to our team.
Now if we can just get Schott to hand the ball to Steven more than 13 times.
_________________
LANCE KENDRICKS 42 RECEPTIONS 519 YARDS
TOUCHDOWNS 4
Go Rams! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 31554
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ajhicks11 wrote: | It will be wonderful to have Scott back. Haven't really been able to see what he brings to our team.
Now if we can just get Schott to hand the ball to Steven more than 13 times. |
I wouldn't really care if Steven only rushes if 13 to 15 times if Daryl Richardson is also running it like 13 to 15 times. But us only running the ball 20 times in a game where we're greatly struggling to move it through the air was dumb. Although those fumbles really hurt us.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DEE RAWL
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 2856
Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Yes!
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ajhicks11
Joined: 15 Jan 2010
Posts: 430
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jrry32 wrote: | | ajhicks11 wrote: | It will be wonderful to have Scott back. Haven't really been able to see what he brings to our team.
Now if we can just get Schott to hand the ball to Steven more than 13 times. |
I wouldn't really care if Steven only rushes if 13 to 15 times if Daryl Richardson is also running it like 13 to 15 times. But us only running the ball 20 times in a game where we're greatly struggling to move it through the air was dumb. Although those fumbles really hurt us. |
I agree that it doesn't matter whether it is D.Rich or Steven or even Pead; but we need to utilize the run more than we do. Steven was running really well and showing that the Jets didn't know how to wrap up during tackles.
What do you think our line looks like with Wells back...?
Saffold - Smith/Turner - Wells - Dahl - B.Rich
_________________
LANCE KENDRICKS 42 RECEPTIONS 519 YARDS
TOUCHDOWNS 4
Go Rams! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 31554
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ajhicks11 wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | ajhicks11 wrote: | It will be wonderful to have Scott back. Haven't really been able to see what he brings to our team.
Now if we can just get Schott to hand the ball to Steven more than 13 times. |
I wouldn't really care if Steven only rushes if 13 to 15 times if Daryl Richardson is also running it like 13 to 15 times. But us only running the ball 20 times in a game where we're greatly struggling to move it through the air was dumb. Although those fumbles really hurt us. |
I agree that it doesn't matter whether it is D.Rich or Steven or even Pead; but we need to utilize the run more than we do. Steven was running really well and showing that the Jets didn't know how to wrap up during tackles.
What do you think our line looks like with Wells back...?
Saffold - Smith/Turner - Wells - Dahl - B.Rich |
Agreed. I think after Sam's performance against NYJ, we need to go into Arizona with a ground and pound game-plan and only change if Sam shows up early on.
As for the OL, not sure. I think I'd probably give Shelley Smith another week after his performance especially considering Turner's versatility so I'd go:
Saffold - Smith - Wels - Dahl - B. Rich(might consider Hunter here if he's ready to go and can play well)
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
S-jax39
Joined: 23 Aug 2010
Posts: 5666
Location: [D]MV
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good riddance miller.
_________________
| SwiftTexan wrote: | | Chris Long has not been a difference maker on defense.......Chris Long is an above average starter and nothing more. |
#Yeezus |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ajhicks11
Joined: 15 Jan 2010
Posts: 430
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jrry32 wrote: | | ajhicks11 wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | ajhicks11 wrote: | It will be wonderful to have Scott back. Haven't really been able to see what he brings to our team.
Now if we can just get Schott to hand the ball to Steven more than 13 times. |
I wouldn't really care if Steven only rushes if 13 to 15 times if Daryl Richardson is also running it like 13 to 15 times. But us only running the ball 20 times in a game where we're greatly struggling to move it through the air was dumb. Although those fumbles really hurt us. |
I agree that it doesn't matter whether it is D.Rich or Steven or even Pead; but we need to utilize the run more than we do. Steven was running really well and showing that the Jets didn't know how to wrap up during tackles.
What do you think our line looks like with Wells back...?
Saffold - Smith/Turner - Wells - Dahl - B.Rich |
Agreed. I think after Sam's performance against NYJ, we need to go into Arizona with a ground and pound game-plan and only change if Sam shows up early on.
As for the OL, not sure. I think I'd probably give Shelley Smith another week after his performance especially considering Turner's versatility so I'd go:
Saffold - Smith - Wels - Dahl - B. Rich(might consider Hunter here
if he's ready to go and can play well) |
I had been pretty impressed with Smith since he had come in(considering circumstances), but he was not good last week. I can't believe how many times someone blew right through his spot in the line.
Sam frustrates me so much. After the niners and the first drive of this recent week I was so confident and then BOOM he is just horrible. Not completely his fault, and at the same time the whole team looked bad, but the inconsistency hurts. I guess I just need to be more accepting of the fact that we are the youngest team in the league...
_________________
LANCE KENDRICKS 42 RECEPTIONS 519 YARDS
TOUCHDOWNS 4
Go Rams! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RamRod
Joined: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 8417
Location: Virginia
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Brit Miller. NOOOOOOOOOO. He was such a good player.
Just kidding.
_________________
Adopt-a-Ram: Brian Quick - 11 receptions, 156 yards, 2 TDs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wr80
Joined: 27 Dec 2011
Posts: 477
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| YES!!!! Wells C and Turner LG we may have a solid O line! Let's pull another 2-3 wins out of this season and i'll be very happy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chris00cm
Joined: 01 Feb 2008
Posts: 16229
Location: St. Charles, Missouri
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think we will see Harkey at FB. He actually got a target last week.
_________________
Xbox Live Gamertag: Chris Sanity |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RamRod
Joined: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 8417
Location: Virginia
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 2:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| chris00cm wrote: | | I think we will see Harkey at FB. He actually got a target last week. |
What about any of the other TEs?
_________________
Adopt-a-Ram: Brian Quick - 11 receptions, 156 yards, 2 TDs |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kgarrett12486
Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 7641
Location: Busch III
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RamRod wrote: | | chris00cm wrote: | | I think we will see Harkey at FB. He actually got a target last week. |
What about any of the other TEs? |
Kendricks has been praised for his blocking out of the backfield, so I'd imagine he'll get more...
_________________
TommyC376 on the sig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 31554
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kgarrett12486 wrote: | | RamRod wrote: | | chris00cm wrote: | | I think we will see Harkey at FB. He actually got a target last week. |
What about any of the other TEs? |
Kendricks has been praised for his blocking out of the backfield, so I'd imagine he'll get more... |
You know what I'd love, if they used Kendricks as a FB and used him as a receiver out of that spot. Most teams don't pay near enough attention to the FB in the passing game. In fact, I'd love to see us line up in a Weak I or Strong I, run a play-action, have Kendricks slip out of the back-field after being lined up at FB and run a wheel route. Most likely, he's left open and it results in a huge play.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
