| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DOCLEW 28
Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10587
Location: East Oakland
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 2:54 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Totty wrote: | | I don't mind this, I just wanted to say that Larry Grant would start over AO. Grant is a legit LB and when he bolts from SF next year, I see him making a outright impact on his next team! |
And he is a Bay Area kid so there may be a chance.
_________________
Raider X hooked me with the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
attack_in_s/b
Joined: 11 Aug 2010
Posts: 397
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ZoomWaffle wrote: | | Baggabonez wrote: | I don't like drafts that make me count. LOL.
Couple questions:
Why would the Jets be so motivated to move up to the #5 pick overall to give the Raiders their 1st, 2nd and 3rd?
Shouldn't it be #10, #42 & #74?
Doesn't Louis play RG? |
We trade back and give them McFadden, and all that gets us is the 42nd and 74th? Trading out of a top-5 spot alone would get us a 2nd and a 3rd (ATL gave up 2 1sts, a 2nd, and 2 4ths to move from 10 to 6 to take Julio Jones)
If we trade down and trade McFadden, it'll be to two different teams and we will get at least a 2nd or multiple mid-round picks for McFadden. |
My thinking exactly... since when does a team get your best player for trading up in the 1st round? We move down 5 slots and lose Mcfadden for a 2nd and 3rd.... sounds like a raider move... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
attack_in_s/b
Joined: 11 Aug 2010
Posts: 397
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
As well, this leaves us with a huge hole at rb... our defense might get fractionally better but our offense will get exponentially worse... regardless of how poorly mcfadden was doing prior to the injury i dont think you can argue our offense is better with him in... at the very least hes someone the defense has to account for, which creates opportunities for our WR`s to step up.
My draft trade:
Trade back further, keep mcfadden... accumulate more draft picks.
Trade #5 Pick for #15-20 + 2013 first rounder +2012 2nd. Moving back that far i dont think this is unrealistic. Sure, theres no RG3 in this draft. But there is always a team that falls in love with a top 10 prospect but isn't picking till later. See RG3 trade, Morris Claiborn, Julio Jones,etc...
Consensus is our 1st round pick is probably gonna be used on a pass rusher... there's always great ones that go in the middle of the 1st... don't need to be picking top 10 to find a good pass rusher and imo Montgomery isn't even the best available at that point. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
backinblack
Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 142
Location: Rochester, N.Y.
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2012 12:14 pm Post subject: Re: Crash's 2013 Raider Mock Offseason |
|
|
|
[quote="CrashMan510"]Crashes 2013 Raider Mock Offseason
Raiders Finished The 2012 Season With A 5-11 Record, Good Enough For The #5 Pick.
2013 FA’s
Bold= Let Go. Not Bold = Resign
Philip Adams(RFA)
Khalif Barnes(UFA)
Ron Bartell(UFA)
Desmond Bryant(UFA)
Duke Calhoun(ERFA)
Cooper Carlisle(UFA)
Andre Carter(UFA)
Coye Francies(RFA)
Omar Gaither(UFA)
Matt Giordano(UFA)
Mike Goodson(UFA)
Derek Hagan(UFA)
Joselio Hanson(UFA)
Zach Hurd(ERFA)
Shane Lechler(UFA)
Matt Leinart(UFA)
Mike Mitchell(UFA)
Brandon Myers(UFA)
Alex Parsons(RFA)
Brandian Ross(ERFA)
Owen Schmitt(UFA)
Matt Shaughnessy(UFA)
Willie Smith(UFA)
Shawntae Spencer(UFA)
Philip Wheeler(UFA)
Cuts
Tommy Kelly- Cut
Rolando McClain- Cut
Dave Tollefson- Cut
Traded
(Raiders) Darren McFadden + #5 Pick -> (Jets) #10 Pick + 2012 #42 Pick + 2012 #72 pickList Of Total Draft Picks -> (1)#10, (2)#42, (3) #67, (3) #72, (4) #99 , (6) #163
Free Agent Pick Up’s
we are already viewed as a joke of a franchise and would make it even worse if we traded DMC for 2 2012,WHICH IS LAST YEARS DRAFT picks! sorry had to do it[/b] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nodisrespect
Joined: 28 Nov 2009
Posts: 2908
Location: in the present
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nice draft, i think trading back is big possibility, given how much McKenzie values draft picks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CrashMan510
Joined: 14 Aug 2012
Posts: 2705
Location: Bay Area
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Version 2 is up
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tacos
Joined: 13 Jan 2011
Posts: 980
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I actually like it a lot.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raiiiiidersssss
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 4117
Location: The Black Hole
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
why are we cutting Seebass? I like it overall, just a few minor quips. Also, I would prefer Star.
But I think trading McFadden and DHB is great.
_________________
If the Raiders don't trade back at 3, I want Fisher, Ziggy, or Star. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baggabonez
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 3754
Location: RaiderNation
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Stanton would beat out Pryor in an open competition. Why would Baker come to Oakland when could sign elsewhere for LT $? What has Bergstrom proven at LG and Ausberry at TE to anoint them starters absent competition? That offense is a recipe for disaster, imo.
_________________
2013 Mancrush: DT Richardson, OT Joeckel, FS Vaccaro, FS Rambo, WR Dobson, RB Michael, TE McDonald, OT Foketi, WR Swope |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
big_palooka
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 19036
Location: ATL
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
So unrealisticly bad. It's 95% pipe dreams.
2nd for Palmer. Not happening.
New England giving a 5th for a WR who can't catch and has a large salary. No.
This isn't madden man
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
