| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| How many Monty Python refrences are there? |
| 1 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| 5 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| 9 |
|
33% |
[ 2 ] |
| 13 |
|
16% |
[ 1 ] |
| 17 |
|
16% |
[ 1 ] |
| Who is Monty Python? |
|
33% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 6 |
|
| Author |
Message |
oland11
Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Posts: 7271
Location: "This ****ing game is over!" - Chuck Bednarik
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:27 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| magross wrote: | No real big fa signings besides bowe, need immediate impact players at safety, d-line, and last lb spot.
Draft is very mediocre too me, rate 2/10
Don't like the pics after the 1st round, feel like u wasted them on "reid" like picks |
You don't need another dream team fiasco magross. Bowe would be a decent signing. You can address safety in the draft. We don't even need a 3rd LB that is dominant because we run out of the nickel D so much. Boykin has more snaps than Jordan most games.
And Dingo's draft is a lot better then a combination of all of your drafts put together. And championships are won in the trenches. Drafting Cooper and Joeckel in the first 2 rounds addresses the horrible play at OT and OG. Drafting White addresses the NT position with a big behemoth.
And how many Monty Python references were in this mock, Dingo?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Broadway Joe
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 6351
Location: Point Place, Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| oland11 wrote: | | magross wrote: | No real big fa signings besides bowe, need immediate impact players at safety, d-line, and last lb spot.
Draft is very mediocre too me, rate 2/10
Don't like the pics after the 1st round, feel like u wasted them on "reid" like picks |
You don't need another dream team fiasco magross. Bowe would be a decent signing. You can address safety in the draft. We don't even need a 3rd LB that is dominant because we run out of the nickel D so much. Boykin has more snaps than Jordan most games.
And Dingo's draft is a lot better then a combination of all of your drafts put together. |
Ouch.
_________________
 
Thanks to Braylon4MVP for the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
magross
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 587
Location: allentown
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I want immediate not 4 years from now, n if u look at half my mocks from last year I did have a lot of signings and drafts correct that u all hated on and said would never happen so ill keep doin mine n u can keep hating
_________________
GM of the Arizona Cardinals (2012 MDFDG Mock)
GM of the Philadelphia Eagles (DaBoyles Mock) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oland11
Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Posts: 7271
Location: "This ****ing game is over!" - Chuck Bednarik
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Broadway Joe wrote: | | oland11 wrote: | | magross wrote: | No real big fa signings besides bowe, need immediate impact players at safety, d-line, and last lb spot.
Draft is very mediocre too me, rate 2/10
Don't like the pics after the 1st round, feel like u wasted them on "reid" like picks |
You don't need another dream team fiasco magross. Bowe would be a decent signing. You can address safety in the draft. We don't even need a 3rd LB that is dominant because we run out of the nickel D so much. Boykin has more snaps than Jordan most games.
And Dingo's draft is a lot better then a combination of all of your drafts put together. |
Ouch. |
Some times you need to tell him the truth. I'll be nicer.
Your mocks aren't taht good Magross. You could need some improvement.  ?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eagles101
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 5944
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| magross wrote: | | I want immediate not 4 years from now, n if u look at half my mocks from last year I did have a lot of signings and drafts correct that u all hated on and said would never happen so ill keep doin mine n u can keep hating |
i wont a flying unicorn that poops golden nuggets....doesnt mean it can happen.
_________________
props to deadpulse
| THE PACK MAN wrote: |
Im not a homer, I said we would lose a game last year when all the analysts predicted us to go 16-0 halfway through the year. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RandyMossIsBoss
Joined: 01 Jun 2012
Posts: 8153
Location: Peppers90 on the sig, Kiltman on the avy
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Pretty good overall, although I laugh at the idea that both Peters and Joeckel don't start right off the bat. Peters is going to be as healthy as he can be by training camp, the only question is how healthy can he be? (as in if his injury will permanently hamper him). Either way, as long as he is dressing and practicing, he will be starting for us o start next year, maybe he'll be horrible and get benched eventually but he will definitely start week 1. Why on earth would Joeckel not start? If we're going to use our top 7 pick on him then we better play him. The obvious move here is to move Herremans to his natural RG spot, where he excels, and start Joeckel at RT. No brainer.
_________________
Chip...Chip...Chipadelphia |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Texas_OutLaw7
Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 19397
Location: Cowboys Forum ROH Class of '12
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
 Why would Dallas trade Hanna for Avant?
_________________
In Redball I Trust!
The price of progress is trusting the process.
Heart. Leadership. Passion. Will. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RandyMossIsBoss
Joined: 01 Jun 2012
Posts: 8153
Location: Peppers90 on the sig, Kiltman on the avy
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Texas_OutLaw7 wrote: | | Why would Dallas trade Hanna for Avant? |
YAC
_________________
Chip...Chip...Chipadelphia |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oland11
Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Posts: 7271
Location: "This ****ing game is over!" - Chuck Bednarik
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| magross wrote: | | I want immediate not 4 years from now, n if u look at half my mocks from last year I did have a lot of signings and drafts correct that u all hated on and said would never happen so ill keep doin mine n u can keep hating |
An Immediate starter isn't LaRon Landry. And Joeckel, Cooper and White all have the potential to be immediate starters given the state of the play at OT, OG and NT.
And in my drafts last year I had us taking 4 of the guys on our roster. Big deal.
All of your mocks are completely unrealistic. You want us to draft Te'o. Which is really the only position we don't need at this moment.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
magross
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 587
Location: allentown
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
A new dc will most likely rid the wide 9 n not play nickel so much, which would leave the lb on more, which are 3rd lb is horrible, but my major concern is safety, we have none, n I'd rather have laron landry then nate allen or kurt coleman he can actually make plays and hit hard . But like I said previously I'd prefer byrd, he's a major playmaker, put him next to nnamdi in the secondary n I guarantee u nnamdis game steps up, bcuz in oakland nnamdi always hjad a safety for help
_________________
GM of the Arizona Cardinals (2012 MDFDG Mock)
GM of the Philadelphia Eagles (DaBoyles Mock) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oland11
Joined: 15 Jul 2011
Posts: 7271
Location: "This ****ing game is over!" - Chuck Bednarik
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| magross wrote: | | A new dc will most likely rid the wide 9 n not play nickel so much, which would leave the lb on more, which are 3rd lb is horrible, but my major concern is safety, we have none, n I'd rather have laron landry then nate allen or kurt coleman he can actually make plays and hit hard . But like I said previously I'd prefer byrd, he's a major playmaker, put him next to nnamdi in the secondary n I guarantee u nnamdis game steps up, bcuz in oakland nnamdi always hjad a safety for help |
A new DC probably means we cleaned house. But even if we don't run the wide-9 we still will be running a Nickle-D. Thus, the need for a 3rd LB to start would go to waste when we could draft someone else.
LaRon Landry can't do squat if he can't even get on the field. We could also draft someone like Elam out of Florida.
And Scrabble was always left one on one in Oakland.
Any other counter arguments?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky_b27
Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 17010
Location: Nottingham, England
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | Texas_OutLaw7 wrote: | | Why would Dallas trade Hanna for Avant? |
YAC |
Of course.
_________________
| oland11 on America's use of Fahrenheit wrote: | | I know. We're stupid. |
| RainbowCarebear wrote: | | Again bloody fool him Howie. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eaglesfan10
Joined: 30 Jan 2009
Posts: 8709
Location: Mack. on the sig
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| oland11 wrote: | | magross wrote: | | A new dc will most likely rid the wide 9 n not play nickel so much, which would leave the lb on more, which are 3rd lb is horrible, but my major concern is safety, we have none, n I'd rather have laron landry then nate allen or kurt coleman he can actually make plays and hit hard . But like I said previously I'd prefer byrd, he's a major playmaker, put him next to nnamdi in the secondary n I guarantee u nnamdis game steps up, bcuz in oakland nnamdi always hjad a safety for help |
A new DC probably means we cleaned house. But even if we don't run the wide-9 we still will be running a Nickle-D. Thus, the need for a 3rd LB to start would go to waste when we could draft someone else.
LaRon Landry can't do squat if he can't even get on the field. We could also draft someone like Elam out of Florida.
And Scrabble was always left one on one in Oakland.
Any other counter arguments? |
You should hop off and let Dingo defend his own mocks.
_________________
| Bednarik60 wrote: | | i am like background melting wax and tiger blood on my nips dancin all angular and side ways like Marshawn Lynch on Scotch. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
baconrad3
Joined: 27 Apr 2010
Posts: 4405
Location: Tempe, AZ
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Lol Oland belittling somebody......This is great .....Trolland found someone to pick on
_________________
#GenoSmith4Heisman
| Broadway Joe wrote: | | Michael Vick would be the perfect wife to Brandon Marshall or Chad Ochocinco. The guy can takes hit after hit after hit and he just doesn't flinch. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
babyatemydingo
Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 5913
Location: South Jersey
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | Pretty good overall, although I laugh at the idea that both Peters and Joeckel don't start right off the bat. Peters is going to be as healthy as he can be by training camp, the only question is how healthy can he be? (as in if his injury will permanently hamper him). Either way, as long as he is dressing and practicing, he will be starting for us o start next year, maybe he'll be horrible and get benched eventually but he will definitely start week 1. Why on earth would Joeckel not start? If we're going to use our top 7 pick on him then we better play him. The obvious move here is to move Herremans to his natural RG spot, where he excels, and start Joeckel at RT. No brainer. |
I didn't put my roster out there in any particular order.
However, I created this with the notion that Peters may not be ready early or at all next season.
It is all going to be subject to how things play out. There will be options.
I mean, why marry yourself to starting a rookie offensive lineman who won't be ready until game four?
Not that that ever happens..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
