| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Rolni
Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Posts: 2165
Location: Europe
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:20 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| JTagg7754 wrote: | | Rolni wrote: | | silver_surfer wrote: | | ill trade up to ensure we nab an elite edge rusher |
Fail.
We need picks, players...
I would like a trade down more and more.
Matthews or a NT or a CB or even a guy like Werner(not freak athlete) could be available after a little trade down and we could pick up an additional 3rd rounder... |
Yeah, Matthews late in the first might still be a little overvaluing him but it's still WAY better than 5th overall and I'd prefer to go BPA rather than specific position due to us needing so many positions. There's no need to reach. Matthews at 5 would be a god-awful pick strictly b/c the value isn't there. He's going to be a solid player I think but not even close to worth that.
In fact, draft Matthews over Star is more fail than supporting JaMarcus Russell......
We need to go BPA and BPA only until we get some of these positions filled. |
I think you are a little too tough on Matthews...He is considered as a sure 1st rounder top20 pick. He is the 3rd best OT at worst. If we pick him between 10-20 it would be a good value.
What's your point against him?
We can agree on BPA...we need the best player, but if there are a bunch of similarly rated guys on our board and there is trade down opportunity we need to take it IMO!
_________________
WIN LOSE OR TIE...RAIDER FAN 'TIL I DIE!!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JTagg7754
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7251
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Rolni wrote: | I think you are a little too tough on Matthews...He is considered as a sure 1st rounder top20 pick. He is the 3rd best OT at worst. If we pick him between 10-20 it would be a good value.
What's your point against him?
We can agree on BPA...we need the best player, but if there are a bunch of similarly rated guys on our board and there is trade down opportunity we need to take it IMO! |
I don't feel he's worth much until the 25-40 range. That's just me. I don't see him as a fit for LT. Maybe if he stays in school another year, possibly. I think it's also arguable that he isn't as good as Dallas Thomas or DJ Fluker and Joekle and Lewan are easily better IMO.
Trading down is the best thing to happen to a team and it makes too much sense to do it but the problem is, it doesn't happen generally albeit everyone wants it to so I don't ever predict trading down although I'd be very happy if it happened.
BPA is definitely the way to go and Matthews isn't even close to being on Star's level. If those two were on the board together and we took Matthews over Star, I'd have no faith in this regime. That would instantly kill it LOL.
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12586
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Rolni wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | Rolni wrote: | | silver_surfer wrote: | | ill trade up to ensure we nab an elite edge rusher |
Fail.
We need picks, players...
I would like a trade down more and more.
Matthews or a NT or a CB or even a guy like Werner(not freak athlete) could be available after a little trade down and we could pick up an additional 3rd rounder... |
Yeah, Matthews late in the first might still be a little overvaluing him but it's still WAY better than 5th overall and I'd prefer to go BPA rather than specific position due to us needing so many positions. There's no need to reach. Matthews at 5 would be a god-awful pick strictly b/c the value isn't there. He's going to be a solid player I think but not even close to worth that.
In fact, draft Matthews over Star is more fail than supporting JaMarcus Russell......
We need to go BPA and BPA only until we get some of these positions filled. |
I think you are a little too tough on Matthews...He is considered as a sure 1st rounder top20 pick. He is the 3rd best OT at worst. If we pick him between 10-20 it would be a good value.
What's your point against him?
We can agree on BPA...we need the best player, but if there are a bunch of similarly rated guys on our board and there is trade down opportunity we need to take it IMO! |
this.
people love to hate on jake like his stock is going down and he is getting owned by the competition.
show me a OT who has faced the type of talent jake has faced all season long and still perform well. besides jarvis, jake has owned all of the top sec de/olb's who are considered first rounders.
after the bama game jakes stock is still on the rise. unless jake bombs the rest of the season he is working his way up the boards and this is before the combine and personal workouts.
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12586
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
fwiw star's team still allows 126yrs/game rushing good for 99th in the nation and 104 in pass d. ive seen teams just run around star. imo he isnt haloti-like and wont impact the results of a game as much as an OT.
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nodisrespect
Joined: 28 Nov 2009
Posts: 2912
Location: in the present
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | fwiw star's team still allows 126yrs/game rushing good for 99th in the nation and 104 in pass d. ive seen teams just run around star. imo he isnt haloti-like and wont impact the results of a game as much as an OT. |
Yeah but Knapp is still the OC so the offense will still have challenges, plus we probably won't draft a lineman high since we use a zbs and already have a left tackle.
We need a guy that can get 10-15 sacks a year more IMO
Last edited by Nodisrespect on Thu Nov 15, 2012 5:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12586
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nodisrespect wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | fwiw star's team still allows 126yrs/game rushing good for 99th in the nation and 104 in pass d. ive seen teams just run around star. imo he isnt haloti-like and wont impact the results of a game as much as an OT. |
Yeah but Knapp is still the OC so the offense with have challenges plus we probably won't draft a lineman high since we use a zbs and already have a left tackle.
We need a guy that can get 10-15 sacks a year more IMO |
did burgess make that much of a difference?
or even kam?
porter and gayle can get to the qb.
if we dont protect the qb be will always be stuck in the mud. zbs has nothing to do with protecting the qb.
its like putting used tires (retread olinemen) on a lambo (cp) then wondering why it doesnt perform like advertised. sure we can get some retread OT's but dont be surprised if you get retread type production.
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ch8878
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 947
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Seeing there is no MLB's that are going to be free agents besides Brian Urlacher if this draft was true they would go into next year with McClain at MLB again I really hope not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OakRaiders3828
Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 9146
Location: Pennsylvania
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ch8878 wrote: | | Seeing there is no MLB's that are going to be free agents besides Brian Urlacher if this draft was true they would go into next year with McClain at MLB again I really hope not. |
We could draft an OLB and shift Burris to the middle.
_________________
O A K L A N D R A I D E R S
Joe_is_the_best on the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ch8878
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 947
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| OakRaiders3828 wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | Seeing there is no MLB's that are going to be free agents besides Brian Urlacher if this draft was true they would go into next year with McClain at MLB again I really hope not. |
We could draft an OLB and shift Burris to the middle. |
Maybe we'll see with only 6 draft picks free agents are going to be key for this team to be successful next year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RaidersJagsFan9
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 1154
Location: Philadelphia PA
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ch8878 wrote: | | Seeing there is no MLB's that are going to be free agents besides Brian Urlacher if this draft was true they would go into next year with McClain at MLB again I really hope not. |
Will Witherspoon is a free agent. He could man the middle for a year or two. While we trade McClain for draft picks.
_________________
^^^^
Props to Pats9ers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raidin
Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Posts: 4309
Location: Dublin
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RaidersJagsFan9 wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | Seeing there is no MLB's that are going to be free agents besides Brian Urlacher if this draft was true they would go into next year with McClain at MLB again I really hope not. |
Will Witherspoon is a free agent. He could man the middle for a year or two. While we trade McClain for draft picks. |
good luck with that.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JTagg7754
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7251
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | fwiw star's team still allows 126yrs/game rushing good for 99th in the nation and 104 in pass d. ive seen teams just run around star. imo he isnt haloti-like and wont impact the results of a game as much as an OT. |
Stats...... LOL
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12586
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JTagg7754 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | fwiw star's team still allows 126yrs/game rushing good for 99th in the nation and 104 in pass d. ive seen teams just run around star. imo he isnt haloti-like and wont impact the results of a game as much as an OT. |
Stats...... LOL |
sorry i know you like to base your arguments on opinions not stats and facts. my bad should have known better.
-btw did you see star's tko moment vrs wash last week?
| Quote: | | Lotulelei's mental mistake midway through the fourth quarter led to the Huskies pulling away. The senior defensive tackle was caught offsides to extend a Washington drive -- the second time Lotulelei was penalized for guessing the snap count rather than watching the ball |
you bash tko all the time but you want to go through it again?
star has skills but also has discipline issues not to mention he has been inconsistent all year. starting to look like d. poe part 2. physical freak but lacks fundamentals.
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RaidersJagsFan9
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 1154
Location: Philadelphia PA
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Raidin wrote: | | RaidersJagsFan9 wrote: | | ch8878 wrote: | | Seeing there is no MLB's that are going to be free agents besides Brian Urlacher if this draft was true they would go into next year with McClain at MLB again I really hope not. |
Will Witherspoon is a free agent. He could man the middle for a year or two. While we trade McClain for draft picks. |
good luck with that. |
It's possible to get a 5th-7th for him.
_________________
^^^^
Props to Pats9ers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JTagg7754
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7251
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | JTagg7754 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | fwiw star's team still allows 126yrs/game rushing good for 99th in the nation and 104 in pass d. ive seen teams just run around star. imo he isnt haloti-like and wont impact the results of a game as much as an OT. |
Stats...... LOL |
sorry i know you like to base your arguments on opinions not stats and facts. my bad should have known better.
-btw did you see star's tko moment vrs wash last week?
| Quote: | | Lotulelei's mental mistake midway through the fourth quarter led to the Huskies pulling away. The senior defensive tackle was caught offsides to extend a Washington drive -- the second time Lotulelei was penalized for guessing the snap count rather than watching the ball |
you bash tko all the time but you want to go through it again?
star has skills but also has discipline issues not to mention he has been inconsistent all year. starting to look like d. poe part 2. physical freak but lacks fundamentals. |
OH NO HE MADE A MISTAKE!?!??!?!? NOOOOOO...... type of stuff you make up excuses for w/ Pryor and Russell.
Star >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jake Matthews get ovah it
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
