| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Final outcome? |
| Dolphins win |
|
25% |
[ 14 ] |
| Bills win |
|
54% |
[ 30 ] |
| Tie (had to put this in) |
|
20% |
[ 11 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 55 |
|
| Author |
Message |
bulger2holt
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 1124
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:50 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| TheWarriorFins wrote: | | bulger2holt wrote: | | bulger2holt wrote: | | TheWarriorFins wrote: | | bulger2holt wrote: | | wasn't real impressed with Tannehill. He has a noodle arm. |
are you serious?  |
Maybe it was his motion or something. Wasn't impressed at all |
I guess he was ok for a rookie, but I don't see a very high ceiling at all. Reminds me of Pennington. Mediocre |
Well he only played 19 games in college as a QB and he's a rookie. Maybe when we get pass mediocre talent on offense around him and get a deep threat we can make a better analyses |
Yeah, he's definitely worth developing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
justo
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9105
Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TheWarriorFins wrote: | | justo wrote: | | TheWarriorFins wrote: | | TheVillain112 wrote: | | TheWarriorFins wrote: | | TheVillain112 wrote: | | AtariB20 wrote: | | Tannehill has A LOT to learn, but he can really sling it. I think he's got a promising future |
I do as well. Needs more around him... |
I'll take anything at this point. Not 1 single deep threat on this team our fastest WR is going at 4.5 |
Keenan Allen is the receiver that you are looking for... |
I get the feeling he won't be there when we draft with our luck but why not try to get a number 1 WR through FA. I'd try to get bowe or jennings and wallace might even hit the market. We do have 50 mil in cap space next year. Butyeah I like keenan allen |
What are you giving up in that tag and trade? |
I really don't see them tagging them but we'll see |
I don't see a way we don't tag him  You think the team is going to allow him to leave like that?
_________________
| jfinley88 wrote: | | Woke up in the shower wearing a frog costume with the nipples cut out and my face painted like a tiger |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheWarriorFins
Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Posts: 208
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bulger2holt wrote: | | TheWarriorFins wrote: | | bulger2holt wrote: | | bulger2holt wrote: | | TheWarriorFins wrote: | | bulger2holt wrote: | | wasn't real impressed with Tannehill. He has a noodle arm. |
are you serious? |
Maybe it was his motion or something. Wasn't impressed at all |
I guess he was ok for a rookie, but I don't see a very high ceiling at all. Reminds me of Pennington. Mediocre |
Well he only played 19 games in college as a QB and he's a rookie. Maybe when we get pass mediocre talent on offense around him and get a deep threat we can make a better analyses |
Yeah, he's definitely worth developing. |
I think so too he did look mediocre today but you could tell he was trying to sling more but when you're three best receivers run a 4.6,4.5,4.5 it's hard. And or fastest was contained very well all gamethe by the bills rookie CB. Our best tidend runs a 4.7 too (fasano). We need a number 1 receiver bad hartline is only a solid 2 and the o line has been mediocre along with the [inappropriate/removed] run game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheVillain112
Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 12482
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| justo wrote: | | I don't see a way we don't tag him You think the team is going to allow him to leave like that? |
And get a 3rd round comp? Yes...
_________________
Thanks Rammy... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bulger2holt
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 1124
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TheWarriorFins wrote: | | bulger2holt wrote: | | TheWarriorFins wrote: | | bulger2holt wrote: | | bulger2holt wrote: | | TheWarriorFins wrote: | | bulger2holt wrote: | | wasn't real impressed with Tannehill. He has a noodle arm. |
are you serious? |
Maybe it was his motion or something. Wasn't impressed at all |
I guess he was ok for a rookie, but I don't see a very high ceiling at all. Reminds me of Pennington. Mediocre |
Well he only played 19 games in college as a QB and he's a rookie. Maybe when we get pass mediocre talent on offense around him and get a deep threat we can make a better analyses |
Yeah, he's definitely worth developing. |
I think so too he did look mediocre today but you could tell he was trying to sling more but when you're three best receivers run a 4.6,4.5,4.5 it's hard. And or fastest was contained very well all gamethe by the bills rookie CB. Our best tidend runs a 4.7 too (fasano). We need a number 1 receiver bad hartline is only a solid 2 and the o line has been mediocre along with the [inappropriate/removed] run game. |
Not sure how your cap situation is, but Bowe, Wallace or Jennings would be good for him. All 3 are #1's. Love to see my Rams get involved in one of those too. If not, how about Keenan Allen with your 1st rounder? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheWarriorFins
Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Posts: 208
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| justo wrote: | | TheWarriorFins wrote: | | justo wrote: | | TheWarriorFins wrote: | | TheVillain112 wrote: | | TheWarriorFins wrote: | | TheVillain112 wrote: | | AtariB20 wrote: | | Tannehill has A LOT to learn, but he can really sling it. I think he's got a promising future |
I do as well. Needs more around him... |
I'll take anything at this point. Not 1 single deep threat on this team our fastest WR is going at 4.5 |
Keenan Allen is the receiver that you are looking for... |
I get the feeling he won't be there when we draft with our luck but why not try to get a number 1 WR through FA. I'd try to get bowe or jennings and wallace might even hit the market. We do have 50 mil in cap space next year. Butyeah I like keenan allen |
What are you giving up in that tag and trade? |
I really don't see them tagging them but we'll see |
I don't see a way we don't tag him You think the team is going to allow him to leave like that? |
I think jennings would have to take a pay cut and the packers the way they're playing seems like he could be expendable. Doesn't help he will be 30 next season and has missed the entire season so far. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ketchup
Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 10988
Location: .flash on the avy
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| justo wrote: | | I don't see a way we don't tag him You think the team is going to allow him to leave like that? |
Tag is a real possibility for Jennings. Not to tag and trade but to get Jennings for another year without the long term commitment. Cobb and Nelson will be our long term starters and will both command hi salary when the time comes so with Jennings getting older and becoming a little banged up, no way i see WW giving him a long term deal. Tag is a real possibility but that's an avenue for Jennings to be a GB Packer in 2013, not to trade him IMO.
_________________
Kempes on the custom sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheWarriorFins
Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Posts: 208
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bulger2holt wrote: | | TheWarriorFins wrote: | | bulger2holt wrote: | | TheWarriorFins wrote: | | bulger2holt wrote: | | bulger2holt wrote: | | TheWarriorFins wrote: | | bulger2holt wrote: | | wasn't real impressed with Tannehill. He has a noodle arm. |
are you serious? |
Maybe it was his motion or something. Wasn't impressed at all |
I guess he was ok for a rookie, but I don't see a very high ceiling at all. Reminds me of Pennington. Mediocre |
Well he only played 19 games in college as a QB and he's a rookie. Maybe when we get pass mediocre talent on offense around him and get a deep threat we can make a better analyses |
Yeah, he's definitely worth developing. |
I think so too he did look mediocre today but you could tell he was trying to sling more but when you're three best receivers run a 4.6,4.5,4.5 it's hard. And or fastest was contained very well all gamethe by the bills rookie CB. Our best tidend runs a 4.7 too (fasano). We need a number 1 receiver bad hartline is only a solid 2 and the o line has been mediocre along with the [inappropriate/removed] run game. |
Not sure how your cap situation is, but Bowe, Wallace or Jennings would be good for him. All 3 are #1's. Love to see my Rams get involved in one of those too. If not, how about Keenan Allen with your 1st rounder? |
We have 50mil this coming FA so I could see us getting 1 of those. We do have to resign a couple of players but I really don't think reggie deserves to be resigned and the way jake long has been playing he isn't even close to worth the money of a franchise tag and not even 10 mil. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eksynyt
Joined: 09 Jul 2008
Posts: 5865
Location: Oregon
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NateDawg wrote: | | Ryan Tannehill is indescribably bad. |
He's no Sanchez
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ketchup
Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 10988
Location: .flash on the avy
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Eksynyt wrote: | | NateDawg wrote: | | Ryan Tannehill is indescribably bad. |
He's no Sanchez |
Not even close to Sanchez bad. Tanny is only starting his 10th game while Sanchez has been horrible for 56 games and counting.
_________________
Kempes on the custom sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
A1steak
Joined: 06 Sep 2012
Posts: 52
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Tannehill is still bad though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheWarriorFins
Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Posts: 208
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Ketchup wrote: | | Eksynyt wrote: | | NateDawg wrote: | | Ryan Tannehill is indescribably bad. |
He's no Sanchez |
Not even close to Sanchez bad. Tanny is only starting his 10th game while Sanchez has been horrible for 56 games and counting. |
Yeah we need a a bigger sample size with some talent aroud him too. He went out in the 5th snap in the jets game so you could say he's only played 9 games in the regular season really, With only 19 games in college. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Emerica
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 1061
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| A1steak wrote: | | Tannehill is still bad though. |
Thanks for your wonderful insight.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vindicatedxx
Joined: 07 Oct 2012
Posts: 609
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Well this game sucked. Whoever put this on the schedule should be fired. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 31554
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JJ89 wrote: | | BillsGuy82 wrote: | | JJ89 wrote: | | SnA ExclusiVe wrote: | | And people thought this guy was better than Russell Wilson? Good God. |
I was thinking the same thing. Wilson has been better IMO |
You homers cannot be serious ? He has no weapons !! He has a solid LT, a average #2 WR and a deep threat !!
Let's not forget EVERY analyst said he has to sit a year. Long term Tanny ALL DAY |
And the experts said Wilson couldn't play in this league? Im sticking with Wilson for the longterm.. |
I'm taking Tannehill.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
