Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Thursday Night Football GDT: Dolphins @ Bills
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 44, 45, 46, 47  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL General
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Final outcome?
Dolphins win
25%
 25%  [ 14 ]
Bills win
54%
 54%  [ 30 ]
Tie (had to put this in)
20%
 20%  [ 11 ]
Total Votes : 55

Author Message
bulger2holt


Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 1581
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheWarriorFins wrote:
bulger2holt wrote:
bulger2holt wrote:
TheWarriorFins wrote:
bulger2holt wrote:
wasn't real impressed with Tannehill. He has a noodle arm.


are you serious? Rolling Eyes




Maybe it was his motion or something. Wasn't impressed at all




I guess he was ok for a rookie, but I don't see a very high ceiling at all. Reminds me of Pennington. Mediocre

Well he only played 19 games in college as a QB and he's a rookie. Maybe when we get pass mediocre talent on offense around him and get a deep threat we can make a better analyses




Yeah, he's definitely worth developing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justo


Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 13094
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheWarriorFins wrote:
justo wrote:
TheWarriorFins wrote:
TheVillain112 wrote:
TheWarriorFins wrote:
TheVillain112 wrote:
AtariB20 wrote:
Tannehill has A LOT to learn, but he can really sling it. I think he's got a promising future


I do as well. Needs more around him...


I'll take anything at this point. Not 1 single deep threat on this team our fastest WR is going at 4.5


Keenan Allen is the receiver that you are looking for...


I get the feeling he won't be there when we draft with our luck but why not try to get a number 1 WR through FA. I'd try to get bowe or jennings and wallace might even hit the market. We do have 50 mil in cap space next year. Butyeah I like keenan allen
What are you giving up in that tag and trade?


I really don't see them tagging them but we'll see


I don't see a way we don't tag him Laughing You think the team is going to allow him to leave like that?
_________________
Pugger wrote:
Pugger? Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TheWarriorFins


Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Posts: 390
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bulger2holt wrote:
TheWarriorFins wrote:
bulger2holt wrote:
bulger2holt wrote:
TheWarriorFins wrote:
bulger2holt wrote:
wasn't real impressed with Tannehill. He has a noodle arm.


are you serious? Rolling Eyes




Maybe it was his motion or something. Wasn't impressed at all




I guess he was ok for a rookie, but I don't see a very high ceiling at all. Reminds me of Pennington. Mediocre

Well he only played 19 games in college as a QB and he's a rookie. Maybe when we get pass mediocre talent on offense around him and get a deep threat we can make a better analyses




Yeah, he's definitely worth developing.


I think so too he did look mediocre today but you could tell he was trying to sling more but when you're three best receivers run a 4.6,4.5,4.5 it's hard. And or fastest was contained very well all gamethe by the bills rookie CB. Our best tidend runs a 4.7 too (fasano). We need a number 1 receiver bad hartline is only a solid 2 and the o line has been mediocre along with the [inappropriate/removed] run game.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheVillain112


Moderator
Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 16251
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

justo wrote:
I don't see a way we don't tag him Laughing You think the team is going to allow him to leave like that?


And get a 3rd round comp? Yes...
_________________
skywindO2 wrote:
IDOG_det wrote:
Should see some Orlovsky vs Manziel this week in the battle of "who's less aware of their surroundings"

Orlovsky has too much experience here. Manziel doesn't stand a chance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bulger2holt


Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 1581
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheWarriorFins wrote:
bulger2holt wrote:
TheWarriorFins wrote:
bulger2holt wrote:
bulger2holt wrote:
TheWarriorFins wrote:
bulger2holt wrote:
wasn't real impressed with Tannehill. He has a noodle arm.


are you serious? Rolling Eyes




Maybe it was his motion or something. Wasn't impressed at all




I guess he was ok for a rookie, but I don't see a very high ceiling at all. Reminds me of Pennington. Mediocre

Well he only played 19 games in college as a QB and he's a rookie. Maybe when we get pass mediocre talent on offense around him and get a deep threat we can make a better analyses




Yeah, he's definitely worth developing.


I think so too he did look mediocre today but you could tell he was trying to sling more but when you're three best receivers run a 4.6,4.5,4.5 it's hard. And or fastest was contained very well all gamethe by the bills rookie CB. Our best tidend runs a 4.7 too (fasano). We need a number 1 receiver bad hartline is only a solid 2 and the o line has been mediocre along with the [inappropriate/removed] run game.




Not sure how your cap situation is, but Bowe, Wallace or Jennings would be good for him. All 3 are #1's. Love to see my Rams get involved in one of those too. If not, how about Keenan Allen with your 1st rounder?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheWarriorFins


Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Posts: 390
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

justo wrote:
TheWarriorFins wrote:
justo wrote:
TheWarriorFins wrote:
TheVillain112 wrote:
TheWarriorFins wrote:
TheVillain112 wrote:
AtariB20 wrote:
Tannehill has A LOT to learn, but he can really sling it. I think he's got a promising future


I do as well. Needs more around him...


I'll take anything at this point. Not 1 single deep threat on this team our fastest WR is going at 4.5


Keenan Allen is the receiver that you are looking for...


I get the feeling he won't be there when we draft with our luck but why not try to get a number 1 WR through FA. I'd try to get bowe or jennings and wallace might even hit the market. We do have 50 mil in cap space next year. Butyeah I like keenan allen
What are you giving up in that tag and trade?


I really don't see them tagging them but we'll see


I don't see a way we don't tag him Laughing You think the team is going to allow him to leave like that?


I think jennings would have to take a pay cut and the packers the way they're playing seems like he could be expendable. Doesn't help he will be 30 next season and has missed the entire season so far.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ketchup


Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 13816
Location: Milwaukee, WI
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

justo wrote:
I don't see a way we don't tag him Laughing You think the team is going to allow him to leave like that?
Tag is a real possibility for Jennings. Not to tag and trade but to get Jennings for another year without the long term commitment. Cobb and Nelson will be our long term starters and will both command hi salary when the time comes so with Jennings getting older and becoming a little banged up, no way i see WW giving him a long term deal. Tag is a real possibility but that's an avenue for Jennings to be a GB Packer in 2013, not to trade him IMO.
_________________

Kempes on the custom sig!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
TheWarriorFins


Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Posts: 390
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bulger2holt wrote:
TheWarriorFins wrote:
bulger2holt wrote:
TheWarriorFins wrote:
bulger2holt wrote:
bulger2holt wrote:
TheWarriorFins wrote:
bulger2holt wrote:
wasn't real impressed with Tannehill. He has a noodle arm.


are you serious? Rolling Eyes




Maybe it was his motion or something. Wasn't impressed at all




I guess he was ok for a rookie, but I don't see a very high ceiling at all. Reminds me of Pennington. Mediocre

Well he only played 19 games in college as a QB and he's a rookie. Maybe when we get pass mediocre talent on offense around him and get a deep threat we can make a better analyses




Yeah, he's definitely worth developing.


I think so too he did look mediocre today but you could tell he was trying to sling more but when you're three best receivers run a 4.6,4.5,4.5 it's hard. And or fastest was contained very well all gamethe by the bills rookie CB. Our best tidend runs a 4.7 too (fasano). We need a number 1 receiver bad hartline is only a solid 2 and the o line has been mediocre along with the [inappropriate/removed] run game.




Not sure how your cap situation is, but Bowe, Wallace or Jennings would be good for him. All 3 are #1's. Love to see my Rams get involved in one of those too. If not, how about Keenan Allen with your 1st rounder?


We have 50mil this coming FA so I could see us getting 1 of those. We do have to resign a couple of players but I really don't think reggie deserves to be resigned and the way jake long has been playing he isn't even close to worth the money of a franchise tag and not even 10 mil.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Eksynyt


Joined: 09 Jul 2008
Posts: 5917
Location: Oregon
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NateDawg wrote:
Ryan Tannehill is indescribably bad.


He's no Sanchez
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ketchup


Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 13816
Location: Milwaukee, WI
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eksynyt wrote:
NateDawg wrote:
Ryan Tannehill is indescribably bad.


He's no Sanchez
Not even close to Sanchez bad. Tanny is only starting his 10th game while Sanchez has been horrible for 56 games and counting.
_________________

Kempes on the custom sig!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
A1steak


Joined: 06 Sep 2012
Posts: 52
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tannehill is still bad though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheWarriorFins


Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Posts: 390
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ketchup wrote:
Eksynyt wrote:
NateDawg wrote:
Ryan Tannehill is indescribably bad.


He's no Sanchez
Not even close to Sanchez bad. Tanny is only starting his 10th game while Sanchez has been horrible for 56 games and counting.

Yeah we need a a bigger sample size with some talent aroud him too. He went out in the 5th snap in the jets game so you could say he's only played 9 games in the regular season really, With only 19 games in college.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Emerica


Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 1381
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A1steak wrote:
Tannehill is still bad though.


Thanks for your wonderful insight.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vindicatedxx


Joined: 07 Oct 2012
Posts: 3093
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well this game sucked. Whoever put this on the schedule should be fired.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jrry32


Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 45986
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JJ89 wrote:
BillsGuy82 wrote:
JJ89 wrote:
SnA ExclusiVe wrote:
And people thought this guy was better than Russell Wilson? Good God.


I was thinking the same thing. Wilson has been better IMO


You homers cannot be serious ? He has no weapons !! He has a solid LT, a average #2 WR and a deep threat !!

Let's not forget EVERY analyst said he has to sit a year. Long term Tanny ALL DAY


And the experts said Wilson couldn't play in this league? Im sticking with Wilson for the longterm..


I'm taking Tannehill.
_________________
The LBC wrote:
Harper41 wrote:
Don't worry. Sean Payton would pass the ball in a Tornado.

But would he do it in a Sharknado?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL General All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 44, 45, 46, 47  Next
Page 45 of 47

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group