| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Nabbs4u
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 19190
Location: Carolina Kiltman on the Sig
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:25 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| ninjapirate wrote: | | Nabbs4u wrote: | | EaglesFan5-36-81 wrote: | | RollEagles wrote: | | PowerElite wrote: | | Nick Foles injury prone? He didn't even have to play a 16 game schedule and he got seriously injured. |
Can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not.
A hairline fracture is hardly a serious injury... |
For a QB a fractured hand is pretty serious because it affects your grip, which could have effected that Maclin miss at the end of the game. That said, he showed he can play through that injury, he just likely got shut down in a "What the hell, were not doing anything anyways and both me and Mike are out the door so lets go out swinging" type deal by Fatman.
Foles played a full half of football with the injury, and outside of one bad throw was pretty good and had us in a position to win.
I'm almost sure PE was being sarcastic though... |
That's the thing though. It's an assumption. Yes Foles had his hand x-rayed at 1/2 and for what ever the reasoning it wasn't noticable enough to be diagnosed. For all we know He could of just as easily suffered that hairline fracture on the last play of the game when he was taken to the ground. I'm not trying to take anything away from his performance good or bad but let's not make this out to be some heroic effect on Nick's part. When in fact there is no evidence of exactly when the injury occurred. Especially the x-rays at half. |
It probably happened when it hurt bad enough to get it x-rayed. |
You mean the free time period between halves? Yes that is probable and the easiest time to check.
_________________
Bird Watch: LeSean McCoy
GM. 12^ Att. 200^ Avg. 4.2^ Rush yds 840^ TD 2}{Rec 54^ Rec yds 373^ TD 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ninjapirate
Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 28402
Location: Vegas
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nabbs4u wrote: | | ninjapirate wrote: | | Nabbs4u wrote: | | EaglesFan5-36-81 wrote: | | RollEagles wrote: | | PowerElite wrote: | | Nick Foles injury prone? He didn't even have to play a 16 game schedule and he got seriously injured. |
Can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not.
A hairline fracture is hardly a serious injury... |
For a QB a fractured hand is pretty serious because it affects your grip, which could have effected that Maclin miss at the end of the game. That said, he showed he can play through that injury, he just likely got shut down in a "What the hell, were not doing anything anyways and both me and Mike are out the door so lets go out swinging" type deal by Fatman.
Foles played a full half of football with the injury, and outside of one bad throw was pretty good and had us in a position to win.
I'm almost sure PE was being sarcastic though... |
That's the thing though. It's an assumption. Yes Foles had his hand x-rayed at 1/2 and for what ever the reasoning it wasn't noticable enough to be diagnosed. For all we know He could of just as easily suffered that hairline fracture on the last play of the game when he was taken to the ground. I'm not trying to take anything away from his performance good or bad but let's not make this out to be some heroic effect on Nick's part. When in fact there is no evidence of exactly when the injury occurred. Especially the x-rays at half. |
It probably happened when it hurt bad enough to get it x-rayed. |
You mean the free time period between halves? Yes that is probable and the easiest time to check. |
I am just saying it's a very safe assumption to make that Nick hurt himself in the first half.
_________________
| UKEaglesFan wrote: | | Searching for Brooklyn Decker Camel on a work laptop - not the smartest thing I've ever done! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nabbs4u
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 19190
Location: Carolina Kiltman on the Sig
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ninjapirate wrote: | | Nabbs4u wrote: | | ninjapirate wrote: | | Nabbs4u wrote: | | EaglesFan5-36-81 wrote: | | RollEagles wrote: | | PowerElite wrote: | | Nick Foles injury prone? He didn't even have to play a 16 game schedule and he got seriously injured. |
Can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not.
A hairline fracture is hardly a serious injury... |
For a QB a fractured hand is pretty serious because it affects your grip, which could have effected that Maclin miss at the end of the game. That said, he showed he can play through that injury, he just likely got shut down in a "What the hell, were not doing anything anyways and both me and Mike are out the door so lets go out swinging" type deal by Fatman.
Foles played a full half of football with the injury, and outside of one bad throw was pretty good and had us in a position to win.
I'm almost sure PE was being sarcastic though... |
That's the thing though. It's an assumption. Yes Foles had his hand x-rayed at 1/2 and for what ever the reasoning it wasn't noticable enough to be diagnosed. For all we know He could of just as easily suffered that hairline fracture on the last play of the game when he was taken to the ground. I'm not trying to take anything away from his performance good or bad but let's not make this out to be some heroic effect on Nick's part. When in fact there is no evidence of exactly when the injury occurred. Especially the x-rays at half. |
It probably happened when it hurt bad enough to get it x-rayed. |
You mean the free time period between halves? Yes that is probable and the easiest time to check. |
I am just saying it's a very safe assumption to make that Nick hurt himself in the first whalf. |
I agree it's the easiest assumption since it was the first time the hand was hurting. My question is if the swelling was supposedly severe enough to have effected the X-ray would it have not been noticable enough to hold him out? I mean isn't that what occured with Vick when he hit his hand on a players helmet? I wonder if the swelling wasn't present until after the game. Hence the MRI that came later. If so the actual break could have happened at any time during the second half as well. That's all.
_________________
Bird Watch: LeSean McCoy
GM. 12^ Att. 200^ Avg. 4.2^ Rush yds 840^ TD 2}{Rec 54^ Rec yds 373^ TD 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ninjapirate
Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 28402
Location: Vegas
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nabbs4u wrote: | | ninjapirate wrote: | | Nabbs4u wrote: | | ninjapirate wrote: | | Nabbs4u wrote: | | EaglesFan5-36-81 wrote: | | RollEagles wrote: | | PowerElite wrote: | | Nick Foles injury prone? He didn't even have to play a 16 game schedule and he got seriously injured. |
Can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not.
A hairline fracture is hardly a serious injury... |
For a QB a fractured hand is pretty serious because it affects your grip, which could have effected that Maclin miss at the end of the game. That said, he showed he can play through that injury, he just likely got shut down in a "What the hell, were not doing anything anyways and both me and Mike are out the door so lets go out swinging" type deal by Fatman.
Foles played a full half of football with the injury, and outside of one bad throw was pretty good and had us in a position to win.
I'm almost sure PE was being sarcastic though... |
That's the thing though. It's an assumption. Yes Foles had his hand x-rayed at 1/2 and for what ever the reasoning it wasn't noticable enough to be diagnosed. For all we know He could of just as easily suffered that hairline fracture on the last play of the game when he was taken to the ground. I'm not trying to take anything away from his performance good or bad but let's not make this out to be some heroic effect on Nick's part. When in fact there is no evidence of exactly when the injury occurred. Especially the x-rays at half. |
It probably happened when it hurt bad enough to get it x-rayed. |
You mean the free time period between halves? Yes that is probable and the easiest time to check. |
I am just saying it's a very safe assumption to make that Nick hurt himself in the first whalf. |
I agree it's the easiest assumption since it was the first time the hand was hurting. My question is if the swelling was supposedly severe enough to have effected the X-ray would it have not been noticable enough to hold him out? I mean isn't that what occured with Vick when he hit his hand on a players helmet? I wonder if the swelling wasn't present until after the game. Hence the MRI that came later. If so the actual break could have happened at any time during the second half as well. That's all. |
Swelling probably got worse over the night.
_________________
| UKEaglesFan wrote: | | Searching for Brooklyn Decker Camel on a work laptop - not the smartest thing I've ever done! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phire
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 39206
Location: #championchip 2012 HoF
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Foles is not injury prone. He was beaten and abused like a rag doll in college and no ducks were given.
Plus:
| Quote: | | Foles is paying plenty of attention to his hand injury, which is expected to need around three weeks to heal. |
_________________
 | theuntouchable wrote: | | Think about this phire. I am the real chow. |
| stevec0008 wrote: | | I read all the time, and laugh, a lot. Mostly at oland. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RainbowCarebear
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 22691
Location: Avenging his brother by slaying three of Prince Rhaegar's bannermen and later Rodrik Greyjoy
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Was people seriously discussing about Foles being injury prone? 
_________________
"Of gold and silver and gemstones, it had none; bronze and iron were the metals of winter"
"He is part of you, Robb. To fear him is to fear you."
"These are northmen, Uncle. The north remembers." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BBIB
Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 7414
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RainbowCarebear wrote: | | Was people seriously discussing about Foles being injury prone? |
Foles has yet to play a full season as a starter in the NFL |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky_b27
Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 17010
Location: Nottingham, England
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BBIB wrote: | | RainbowCarebear wrote: | | Was people seriously discussing about Foles being injury prone? |
Foles has yet to play a full season as a starter in the NFL |
The last time Vick did, most of the Eagles roster was still at High School.
_________________
| oland11 on America's use of Fahrenheit wrote: | | I know. We're stupid. |
| RainbowCarebear wrote: | | Again bloody fool him Howie. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phire
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 39206
Location: #championchip 2012 HoF
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
So by that logic RG3 is injury prone?
Couldn't even go 16 games
_________________
| theuntouchable wrote: | | Think about this phire. I am the real chow. |
| stevec0008 wrote: | | I read all the time, and laugh, a lot. Mostly at oland. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blahman88
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 21774
Location: DA BRITUSH IZLES
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
PEyton Manning is injury prone, out of the last 31 games he's played less then half
_________________
^Officially endorsed by Jon Dorenbos
| RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | I would do the same but I know better then to start beef with the EBB. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phire
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 39206
Location: #championchip 2012 HoF
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Blahman88 wrote: | | PEyton Manning is injury prone, out of the last 31 games he's played less then half |
Useless.
_________________
| theuntouchable wrote: | | Think about this phire. I am the real chow. |
| stevec0008 wrote: | | I read all the time, and laugh, a lot. Mostly at oland. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PowerElite
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Posts: 7624
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Phire wrote: | So by that logic RG3 is injury prone?
Couldn't even go 16 games |
I don't think that you grasp the logic if you are comparing Foles' 7 games played to what will be Griffin's 15th game played. More than twice the NFL games played and who knows how much more contact to the body... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Meco
Joined: 30 Aug 2012
Posts: 2318
Location: Las Vegas
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hammertime52
Joined: 15 Jan 2012
Posts: 5098
Location: South Jersey
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| PowerElite wrote: | | Phire wrote: | So by that logic RG3 is injury prone?
Couldn't even go 16 games |
I don't think that you grasp the logic if you are comparing Foles' 7 games played to what will be Griffin's 15th game played. More than twice the NFL games played and who knows how much more contact to the body... |
_________________
Bird Watch: Brent Celek
Catches: 41 Yards: 509 TDs: 1 EPIC Hurdles: 1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NoHypeNeeded
Joined: 09 Jan 2008
Posts: 10471
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Hammertime52 wrote: | | PowerElite wrote: | | Phire wrote: | So by that logic RG3 is injury prone?
Couldn't even go 16 games |
I don't think that you grasp the logic if you are comparing Foles' 7 games played to what will be Griffin's 15th game played. More than twice the NFL games played and who knows how much more contact to the body... |
|
Ahh Jerry.
_________________
| Jroc04 wrote: | | This is the Eagles forum; we woke up drinking. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
