| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
thelawoffices
Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 12382
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:53 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Bo_Spice wrote: | | I really hope Lane Kiffin quits using so many short passes and bubble screens when Wittek takes over though. |
I think that's pretty dependent on how the OL develops. Barkley didn't throw nearly as many short passes last year when he had Kalil protecting his blindside.
_________________
| StevePerry wrote: | How old are you? 18?
This guy was dropping hits when you were in diapers.
His voice was incredible. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darkness
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 4166
Location: CA-TX
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| thelawoffices wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | I really hope Lane Kiffin quits using so many short passes and bubble screens when Wittek takes over though. |
I think that's pretty dependent on how the OL develops. Barkley didn't throw nearly as many short passes last year when he had Kalil protecting his blindside. |
What do you guys think of Barkley?
_________________
El ramster made the sig!
| candyman93 wrote: | Reading Darkness posts you'd think the warriors were playoff contenders  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thelawoffices
Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 12382
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Darkness wrote: | | thelawoffices wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | I really hope Lane Kiffin quits using so many short passes and bubble screens when Wittek takes over though. |
I think that's pretty dependent on how the OL develops. Barkley didn't throw nearly as many short passes last year when he had Kalil protecting his blindside. |
What do you guys think of Barkley? |
I still like him, although he has regressed this year. He has all the intangibles you would want in a QB, but his physical attributes aren't all that great, although I think his arm strength is pretty underrated around here. My problem with him this season is pretty much squarely on his decision making. The OL has really regressed, and there have been times where he feels the pressure and just tries to force the ball, usually to Lee. If he goes to a team who has a good OL, I think he'll be successful.
_________________
| StevePerry wrote: | How old are you? 18?
This guy was dropping hits when you were in diapers.
His voice was incredible. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bo_Spice
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 7076
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Darkness wrote: | | thelawoffices wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | I really hope Lane Kiffin quits using so many short passes and bubble screens when Wittek takes over though. |
I think that's pretty dependent on how the OL develops. Barkley didn't throw nearly as many short passes last year when he had Kalil protecting his blindside. |
What do you guys think of Barkley? |
Andy Dalton 2.0 with a little stronger arm. He'll need weapons on the outside and a really good offensive line to be good but his floor is pretty low because he's a student of the game and has all of the intangibles.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Darkness
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 4166
Location: CA-TX
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good breakdowns. It'll be interesting to see where he goes in this years weak QB class. I'm guessing high 2nd round.
_________________
El ramster made the sig!
| candyman93 wrote: | | Reading Darkness posts you'd think the warriors were playoff contenders |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baggabonez
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 3758
Location: RaiderNation
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Darkness wrote: | | thelawoffices wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | I really hope Lane Kiffin quits using so many short passes and bubble screens when Wittek takes over though. |
I think that's pretty dependent on how the OL develops. Barkley didn't throw nearly as many short passes last year when he had Kalil protecting his blindside. |
What do you guys think of Barkley? |
Sanchez 2.0; Top 10 - 15 pick drafted by the Arizona Cardinals
_________________
2013 Mancrush: DT Richardson, OT Joeckel, FS Vaccaro, FS Rambo, WR Dobson, RB Michael, TE McDonald, OT Foketi, WR Swope |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
big_palooka
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 19040
Location: ATL
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Darkness wrote: | | Good breakdowns. It'll be interesting to see where he goes in this years weak QB class. I'm guessing high 2nd round. |
??
He will go top 5. Likely #1 overall.
He's still a solid QB. USC's Oline is hot garbage this season and that has really effected his play.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JTagg7754
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7237
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Anything that has Campbell as our QB isnt' something I want. People complain about Carson dinking and dunking from time to time and that's ALL Campbell ever did. Then when he finally did go deep, he's 5 yards off target. Dude was SO overrated.
BUT, he DID dive, he DID break his collarbone, and he IS (thankfully) off this team. Why are we even talking about this?
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JTagg7754
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7237
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Darkness wrote: | | Good breakdowns. It'll be interesting to see where he goes in this years weak QB class. I'm guessing high 2nd round. |
Barkley??? High 2nd round??? ............ LOLWUT........... did you mean high 2nd as in 2nd overall pick? He'll more than likely be the first QB taken........
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OakRaiders3828
Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 9140
Location: Pennsylvania
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
After seeing Campbell last night, do people still wish he was our QB?
_________________
O A K L A N D R A I D E R S
Joe_is_the_best on the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JTagg7754
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7237
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| OakRaiders3828 wrote: | | After seeing Campbell last night, do people still wish he was our QB? |
Unfortunately, I'm sure of it. Dude was so overrated it's not even funny.
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jamethus92
Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 4494
Location: Colorado Springs
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
It wasn't that Campbell was so great as a QB. It's that he was a great fit for what Hue wanted to do. The offense usually ran pretty smoothly with Campbell under center. We would have our hiccups and days where we didn't show up at all, but not any more than we do now (think Denver, Baltimore).
That said, I'm still cool with Palmer for now. We're two late 4th quarter interceptions away from being 5-4, but one Carson Palmer away from being 0-9.
_________________
Kiltman on the new sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
91jmay
Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 20647
Location: Wonderland
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jamethus92 wrote: | It wasn't that Campbell was so great as a QB. It's that he was a great fit for what Hue wanted to do. The offense usually ran pretty smoothly with Campbell under center. We would have our hiccups and days where we didn't show up at all, but not any more than we do now (think Denver, Baltimore).
That said, I'm still cool with Palmer for now. We're two late 4th quarter interceptions away from being 5-4, but one Carson Palmer away from being 0-9. |
Nail. Head.
Sigged.
_________________
| baconrad3 wrote: | | You mean Matt Stafford aka Stat Padford? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OakRaiders3828
Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 9140
Location: Pennsylvania
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 91jmay wrote: | | Jamethus92 wrote: | It wasn't that Campbell was so great as a QB. It's that he was a great fit for what Hue wanted to do. The offense usually ran pretty smoothly with Campbell under center. We would have our hiccups and days where we didn't show up at all, but not any more than we do now (think Denver, Baltimore).
That said, I'm still cool with Palmer for now. We're two late 4th quarter interceptions away from being 5-4, but one Carson Palmer away from being 0-9. |
Nail. Head.
Sigged. |
Agreed without him, we're worse than the Chiefs.
_________________
O A K L A N D R A I D E R S
Joe_is_the_best on the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Darkness
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 4166
Location: CA-TX
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Jamethus92 wrote: | It wasn't that Campbell was so great as a QB. It's that he was a great fit for what Hue wanted to do. The offense usually ran pretty smoothly with Campbell under center. We would have our hiccups and days where we didn't show up at all, but not any more than we do now (think Denver, Baltimore).
That said, I'm still cool with Palmer for now. We're two late 4th quarter interceptions away from being 5-4, but one Carson Palmer away from being 0-9. |
Hue Jackson's as aggressive as they come and Jason Campbell's the opposite. With the Raiders dominant rushing attack, Hue wanted a QB that would capitalize throwing down the field to our speedy playmakers. That's why he was so giddish about adding Palmer. If Palmer played this season with McFadden leading the league in rushing like he did last season, the offense would be very tough to stop.
_________________
El ramster made the sig!
| candyman93 wrote: | | Reading Darkness posts you'd think the warriors were playoff contenders |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
