| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BroncsDominate
Joined: 15 Dec 2008
Posts: 1009
Location: Fishing at Standley Lake
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:56 pm Post subject: Cedric Benson |
 |
|
|
| Hey guys. had a question. Can Cedric Benson come back and play this year or is he on season ending IR? If not, what week is he eligible to come back? Thank you! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vang_evo9
Joined: 13 Aug 2011
Posts: 1113
Location: Fresno, CA
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| He was put on IR but was designated to return after 8 weeks i believe. I think he can return by week 12...correct me if im wrong someone |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ketchup
Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 14785
Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| vang_evo9 wrote: | | He was put on IR but was designated to return after 8 weeks i believe. I think he can return by week 12...correct me if im wrong someone |
You are correct. He was put on IR with the designated to return label. He has to be on IR for at least 8 weeks so he'll be eligible to return week 12.
_________________
Kempes on the custom sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pugger
Joined: 01 May 2010
Posts: 9947
Location: N. Fort Myers, FL
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
And from what I'm gleaning he is coming along nicely too so unless he has a set-back he'll return for week 12 and not a moment too soon.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 85466
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
has he really been all that good or even above average for GB though?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blankman0021
Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 1955
Location: MKE
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | has he really been all that good or even above average for GB though? |
Hard to say. The line was (is) very below avg at run blocking.
He's been the best we've had though.
The Numbers:
ATT YRDS Y/C Long
Benson: 71 248 3.5 11
Green: 87 272 3.1 41
Starks: 23 80 3.5 14
Kuhn: 11 39 3.5 9
Cobb: 6 96 16.0 28
Rodgers: 35 162 4.6 25
Very pedestrian across the board. Would like to see Cobb touch the ball more out of the backfield, and Rodgers #'s are polluted by scrambles for 0 yrds and kneel downs so take that with a grain of salt.
As for the runningbacks, it's kind of sad when you don't have a better YPC than your fullback...
But Benson did look good(relatively speaking) when he was out there.
_________________
| The Doctor wrote: | | ALLONS-Y, ALONSO! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SnakePlissken
Joined: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 581
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Benson was by far the most effective back we've had all year. His vision is top notch and he picked up the hard yards, rarely tripping on his feet and falling down for a 2 yard gain. I always felt he never left any yards on the field after a game, unlike Green.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pugger
Joined: 01 May 2010
Posts: 9947
Location: N. Fort Myers, FL
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| JaguarCrazy2832 wrote: | | has he really been all that good or even above average for GB though? |
He ran better than any of other RBs. He was averaging about his career average when he got hurt.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DavidatMIZZOU
Joined: 09 Apr 2009
Posts: 10525
Location: The ZOU
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'd like fewer carries from Cobb to be honest. Eventually it won't work.
As for Benson, he was getting that 3.5 by actually getting about 3.5 per carry. The rest can and do lose yards. All I ask of the running game is to get positive yards. He does the best job of it.
_________________
GO PACK GO!
| mistakebytehlak wrote: |
My god it must be so terrible to have three teams that consistently make the playoffs |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blankman0021
Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 1955
Location: MKE
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I just saw this tidbit going through a NFL fantasy waiver wire report.
| Michael Fabiano wrote: | 6. James Starks, RB, Green Bay Packers (76.9 percent):
The Packers appear to be done with Alex Green in a featured role, as Starks led the team with 17 carries and 61 rushing yards against the Arizona Cardinals. Green Bay was on a bye last week, so Starks remains a free agent in most fantasy leagues. Remember, Cedric Benson can't return until Week 14. |
What gives? Another talking head that doesn't know what he's talking about, or are we wrong with our week 12 ideas?
_________________
| The Doctor wrote: | | ALLONS-Y, ALONSO! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rbens06
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 858
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| blankman0021 wrote: | I just saw this tidbit going through a NFL fantasy waiver wire report.
| Michael Fabiano wrote: | 6. James Starks, RB, Green Bay Packers (76.9 percent):
The Packers appear to be done with Alex Green in a featured role, as Starks led the team with 17 carries and 61 rushing yards against the Arizona Cardinals. Green Bay was on a bye last week, so Starks remains a free agent in most fantasy leagues. Remember, Cedric Benson can't return until Week 14. |
What gives? Another talking head that doesn't know what he's talking about, or are we wrong with our week 12 ideas? |
Week 12 is when he can return to practice, but he cannot play in a game until week 14. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
palmy50
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 14181
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
As long as we have Benson come playoff time, I'm good!
Will view that as one of the better value contracts on the team this year if that's how it plays out. TT also made a good choice by not taking his money. There was a line in his deal that played out with a large money pull should Benson go on the IR. Having a happy Benson that feels the team is on his side could pay off large later on IMO.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pack4life7
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 3298
Location: Illinois
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| palmy50 wrote: | As long as we have Benson come playoff time, I'm good!
Will view that as one of the better value contracts on the team this year if that's how it plays out. TT also made a good choice by not taking his money. There was a line in his deal that played out with a large money pull should Benson go on the IR. Having a happy Benson that feels the team is on his side could pay off large later on IMO. |
This is my hope as well. Comes back in time to get his reps before the playoffs, helps us win a Super Bowl, then resigns with us for a market friendly 3 year deal.
I'm an Alex Green supporter but the difference between him and Benson right now is night and day. With Ced in their we are just a completely different Offense.
_________________
Ted brought us Clay
Same Old Jay |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justo
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 13588
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
He's out of the boot FWIW
_________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | The difference is that this is a FOOTBALL forum. Heated debates about FOOTBALL are expected and encouraged. If you want to discuss your cure for Ebola, try ebolasfuture.com or any other appropriate forum. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pack4life7
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 3298
Location: Illinois
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| justo wrote: | | He's out of the boot FWIW |
2010 parallels-
Sloppy and rocky start
Team riddled with injuries
RB who no one is talking about comes in late season to give us a new dimension
No one is talking about us
Falcons are the #1 seed
Defense really coming together
Oh yeah, and Aaron was a great QB in 2010 and is now the best in the NFL hands down.
Starting to get exciting.
_________________
Ted brought us Clay
Same Old Jay |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
