| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BEASToftheEAST4
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 2627
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:36 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| 81_80_39_28_10 wrote: | I'm not so sure we take a WR in the first round. If we take one, what does that say about Brian Quick? They just took him at the top of the 2nd round last year and are already giving up on him?
I wouldn't mind a WR in the first round but I don't think they go that route. |
I don't think it would be any discredit to Quick. Quick isn't a true #1 receiver, but has potential to be a top end #2, so if we can get a #1 (ala Keenan Allen) then go for it and we should be set for a long time
_________________
^El Ramster^
If you're into hardcore/metal, check out my band: Portrait of a Prophecy
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Portrait-of-a-Prophecy/118264468260007 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kgarrett12486
Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 7643
Location: Busch III
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BEASToftheEAST4 wrote: | | Quick isn't a true #1 receiver, but has potential to be a top end #2, so if we can get a #1 (ala Keenan Allen) then go for it and we should be set for a long time |
I don't think we can make that assessment yet, remember this a guy who Les Snead compared his skill-set to Terrell Owens'...
He was drafted to become an elite target...
_________________
TommyC376 on the sig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DEE RAWL
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 2857
Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kgarrett12486 wrote: | | BEASToftheEAST4 wrote: | | Quick isn't a true #1 receiver, but has potential to be a top end #2, so if we can get a #1 (ala Keenan Allen) then go for it and we should be set for a long time |
I don't think we can make that assessment yet, remember this a guy who Les Snead compared his skill-set to Terrell Owens'...
He was drafted to become an elite target... |
Allen has made a career off of playing slot at cal in 3/4 WR sets and it would be really nice to have Givens/Quick on the outside with Allen in the slot. With 21 personnel being a Allen at the 1 and Quick/Givens rotating at the 2. I am fully aware that 21 personal and the "1&2" talk have nothing to do with eachother.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jjab360
Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Posts: 3366
Location: On Top
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DEE RAWL wrote: | | kgarrett12486 wrote: | | BEASToftheEAST4 wrote: | | Quick isn't a true #1 receiver, but has potential to be a top end #2, so if we can get a #1 (ala Keenan Allen) then go for it and we should be set for a long time |
I don't think we can make that assessment yet, remember this a guy who Les Snead compared his skill-set to Terrell Owens'...
He was drafted to become an elite target... |
Allen has made a career off of playing slot at cal in 3/4 WR sets and it would be really nice to have Givens/Quick on the outside with Allen in the slot. With 21 personnel being a Allen at the 1 and Quick/Givens rotating at the 2. I am fully aware that 21 personal and the "1&2" talk have nothing to do with eachother. |
No thanks. Danny is an awesome slot guy, one of the best in the league, no reason to take another one in the first round. Give me somebody explosive like Hunter, Hopkins, or Patterson. Those are my first, second, and third favorite choices at WR right now, BTW.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wr80
Joined: 27 Dec 2011
Posts: 477
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jjab360 wrote: | | DEE RAWL wrote: | | kgarrett12486 wrote: | | BEASToftheEAST4 wrote: | | Quick isn't a true #1 receiver, but has potential to be a top end #2, so if we can get a #1 (ala Keenan Allen) then go for it and we should be set for a long time |
I don't think we can make that assessment yet, remember this a guy who Les Snead compared his skill-set to Terrell Owens'...
He was drafted to become an elite target... |
Allen has made a career off of playing slot at cal in 3/4 WR sets and it would be really nice to have Givens/Quick on the outside with Allen in the slot. With 21 personnel being a Allen at the 1 and Quick/Givens rotating at the 2. I am fully aware that 21 personal and the "1&2" talk have nothing to do with eachother. |
No thanks. Danny is an awesome slot guy, one of the best in the league, no reason to take another one in the first round. Give me somebody explosive like Hunter, Hopkins, or Patterson. Those are my first, second, and third favorite choices at WR right now, BTW. |
Everyone who's a Tennessee fan hates Hunter, they say he drops the ball and isn't that good. I like Patterson tho kid is a beast and would make an immediate impact on PR/KR |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 31662
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jjab360 wrote: | | DEE RAWL wrote: | | kgarrett12486 wrote: | | BEASToftheEAST4 wrote: | | Quick isn't a true #1 receiver, but has potential to be a top end #2, so if we can get a #1 (ala Keenan Allen) then go for it and we should be set for a long time |
I don't think we can make that assessment yet, remember this a guy who Les Snead compared his skill-set to Terrell Owens'...
He was drafted to become an elite target... |
Allen has made a career off of playing slot at cal in 3/4 WR sets and it would be really nice to have Givens/Quick on the outside with Allen in the slot. With 21 personnel being a Allen at the 1 and Quick/Givens rotating at the 2. I am fully aware that 21 personal and the "1&2" talk have nothing to do with eachother. |
No thanks. Danny is an awesome slot guy, one of the best in the league, no reason to take another one in the first round. Give me somebody explosive like Hunter, Hopkins, or Patterson. Those are my first, second, and third favorite choices at WR right now, BTW. |
I like Allen, Hunter and TW in Round 1. If we don't go WR in Round 1, I want Markus Wheaton.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DEE RAWL
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 2857
Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jjab360 wrote: | | DEE RAWL wrote: | | kgarrett12486 wrote: | | BEASToftheEAST4 wrote: | | Quick isn't a true #1 receiver, but has potential to be a top end #2, so if we can get a #1 (ala Keenan Allen) then go for it and we should be set for a long time |
I don't think we can make that assessment yet, remember this a guy who Les Snead compared his skill-set to Terrell Owens'...
He was drafted to become an elite target... |
Allen has made a career off of playing slot at cal in 3/4 WR sets and it would be really nice to have Givens/Quick on the outside with Allen in the slot. With 21 personnel being a Allen at the 1 and Quick/Givens rotating at the 2. I am fully aware that 21 personal and the "1&2" talk have nothing to do with eachother. |
No thanks. Danny is an awesome slot guy, one of the best in the league, no reason to take another one in the first round. Give me somebody explosive like Hunter, Hopkins, or Patterson. Those are my first, second, and third favorite choices at WR right now, BTW. |
Did I say to stop using danny? Never. But in situations where danny is hurt, which is most of the time and/or he retires. All im saying is Allen has the ability to play slot and play it well.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
holt_bruce81
Joined: 23 Oct 2005
Posts: 18450
Location: St. Louis
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iRaMs
Joined: 05 May 2010
Posts: 2588
Location: Teletran 1
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| holt_bruce81 wrote: | | What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one? |
Then grab Markus Wheaton and Tony Jefferson on defense.
_________________
Robert Quinn
23 Tackles 8.5 sacks 1 Fumble |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DEE RAWL
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 2857
Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| holt_bruce81 wrote: | | What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one? |
IMO if it was me I would choose Lewan over Matthews. But i love Warmack big time. I think if Allen is available when either one of the picks are up then they gotta pull the trigger. I really dont think they will decide to snag 2 OL in round 1. I think it would be stupid not to take Warmack considering the glaring need at LG and an elite prospect at that position coming out and projected to be there right where the picks are supposed to be.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iRaMs
Joined: 05 May 2010
Posts: 2588
Location: Teletran 1
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| holt_bruce81 wrote: | | What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one? |
Then grab Markus Wheaton and Tony Jefferson on defense.
_________________
Robert Quinn
23 Tackles 8.5 sacks 1 Fumble |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 31662
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| holt_bruce81 wrote: | | What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one? |
Not sure. Depends on what we do with WR in FA.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kgarrett12486
Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 7643
Location: Busch III
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| holt_bruce81 wrote: | | What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one? |
Best OT and OG in the darft, I wouldn't mind one bit...
_________________
TommyC376 on the sig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DEE RAWL
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 2857
Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kgarrett12486 wrote: | | holt_bruce81 wrote: | | What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one? |
Best OT and OG in the darft, I wouldn't mind one bit... |
Best OT?... Debatable.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kgarrett12486
Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 7643
Location: Busch III
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DEE RAWL wrote: | | kgarrett12486 wrote: | | holt_bruce81 wrote: | | What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one? |
Best OT and OG in the darft, I wouldn't mind one bit... |
Best OT?... Debatable. |
Not to me...
_________________
TommyC376 on the sig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
