Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

General Draft Discussion
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15 ... 134, 135, 136  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> St. Louis Rams
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BEASToftheEAST4


Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 2728
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

81_80_39_28_10 wrote:
I'm not so sure we take a WR in the first round. If we take one, what does that say about Brian Quick? They just took him at the top of the 2nd round last year and are already giving up on him?

I wouldn't mind a WR in the first round but I don't think they go that route.


I don't think it would be any discredit to Quick. Quick isn't a true #1 receiver, but has potential to be a top end #2, so if we can get a #1 (ala Keenan Allen) then go for it and we should be set for a long time
_________________

^El Ramster^
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kgarrett12486


Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 9656
Location: Busch III
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BEASToftheEAST4 wrote:
Quick isn't a true #1 receiver, but has potential to be a top end #2, so if we can get a #1 (ala Keenan Allen) then go for it and we should be set for a long time


I don't think we can make that assessment yet, remember this a guy who Les Snead compared his skill-set to Terrell Owens'...

He was drafted to become an elite target...
_________________

IDOG_det on the sig...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DEE RAWL


Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 4515
Location: Southern California
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kgarrett12486 wrote:
BEASToftheEAST4 wrote:
Quick isn't a true #1 receiver, but has potential to be a top end #2, so if we can get a #1 (ala Keenan Allen) then go for it and we should be set for a long time


I don't think we can make that assessment yet, remember this a guy who Les Snead compared his skill-set to Terrell Owens'...

He was drafted to become an elite target...


Allen has made a career off of playing slot at cal in 3/4 WR sets and it would be really nice to have Givens/Quick on the outside with Allen in the slot. With 21 personnel being a Allen at the 1 and Quick/Givens rotating at the 2. I am fully aware that 21 personal and the "1&2" talk have nothing to do with eachother.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
jjab360


Joined: 31 Dec 2008
Posts: 4052
Location: On Top
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DEE RAWL wrote:
kgarrett12486 wrote:
BEASToftheEAST4 wrote:
Quick isn't a true #1 receiver, but has potential to be a top end #2, so if we can get a #1 (ala Keenan Allen) then go for it and we should be set for a long time


I don't think we can make that assessment yet, remember this a guy who Les Snead compared his skill-set to Terrell Owens'...

He was drafted to become an elite target...


Allen has made a career off of playing slot at cal in 3/4 WR sets and it would be really nice to have Givens/Quick on the outside with Allen in the slot. With 21 personnel being a Allen at the 1 and Quick/Givens rotating at the 2. I am fully aware that 21 personal and the "1&2" talk have nothing to do with eachother.

No thanks. Danny is an awesome slot guy, one of the best in the league, no reason to take another one in the first round. Give me somebody explosive like Hunter, Hopkins, or Patterson. Those are my first, second, and third favorite choices at WR right now, BTW.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Wr80


Joined: 27 Dec 2011
Posts: 492
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jjab360 wrote:
DEE RAWL wrote:
kgarrett12486 wrote:
BEASToftheEAST4 wrote:
Quick isn't a true #1 receiver, but has potential to be a top end #2, so if we can get a #1 (ala Keenan Allen) then go for it and we should be set for a long time


I don't think we can make that assessment yet, remember this a guy who Les Snead compared his skill-set to Terrell Owens'...

He was drafted to become an elite target...


Allen has made a career off of playing slot at cal in 3/4 WR sets and it would be really nice to have Givens/Quick on the outside with Allen in the slot. With 21 personnel being a Allen at the 1 and Quick/Givens rotating at the 2. I am fully aware that 21 personal and the "1&2" talk have nothing to do with eachother.

No thanks. Danny is an awesome slot guy, one of the best in the league, no reason to take another one in the first round. Give me somebody explosive like Hunter, Hopkins, or Patterson. Those are my first, second, and third favorite choices at WR right now, BTW.


Everyone who's a Tennessee fan hates Hunter, they say he drops the ball and isn't that good. I like Patterson tho kid is a beast and would make an immediate impact on PR/KR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jrry32


Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 46504
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jjab360 wrote:
DEE RAWL wrote:
kgarrett12486 wrote:
BEASToftheEAST4 wrote:
Quick isn't a true #1 receiver, but has potential to be a top end #2, so if we can get a #1 (ala Keenan Allen) then go for it and we should be set for a long time


I don't think we can make that assessment yet, remember this a guy who Les Snead compared his skill-set to Terrell Owens'...

He was drafted to become an elite target...


Allen has made a career off of playing slot at cal in 3/4 WR sets and it would be really nice to have Givens/Quick on the outside with Allen in the slot. With 21 personnel being a Allen at the 1 and Quick/Givens rotating at the 2. I am fully aware that 21 personal and the "1&2" talk have nothing to do with eachother.

No thanks. Danny is an awesome slot guy, one of the best in the league, no reason to take another one in the first round. Give me somebody explosive like Hunter, Hopkins, or Patterson. Those are my first, second, and third favorite choices at WR right now, BTW.


I like Allen, Hunter and TW in Round 1. If we don't go WR in Round 1, I want Markus Wheaton.
_________________
The LBC wrote:
Harper41 wrote:
Don't worry. Sean Payton would pass the ball in a Tornado.

But would he do it in a Sharknado?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DEE RAWL


Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 4515
Location: Southern California
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jjab360 wrote:
DEE RAWL wrote:
kgarrett12486 wrote:
BEASToftheEAST4 wrote:
Quick isn't a true #1 receiver, but has potential to be a top end #2, so if we can get a #1 (ala Keenan Allen) then go for it and we should be set for a long time


I don't think we can make that assessment yet, remember this a guy who Les Snead compared his skill-set to Terrell Owens'...

He was drafted to become an elite target...


Allen has made a career off of playing slot at cal in 3/4 WR sets and it would be really nice to have Givens/Quick on the outside with Allen in the slot. With 21 personnel being a Allen at the 1 and Quick/Givens rotating at the 2. I am fully aware that 21 personal and the "1&2" talk have nothing to do with eachother.

No thanks. Danny is an awesome slot guy, one of the best in the league, no reason to take another one in the first round. Give me somebody explosive like Hunter, Hopkins, or Patterson. Those are my first, second, and third favorite choices at WR right now, BTW.


Did I say to stop using danny? Never. But in situations where danny is hurt, which is most of the time and/or he retires. All im saying is Allen has the ability to play slot and play it well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
holt_bruce81


Joined: 23 Oct 2005
Posts: 20006
Location: St. Louis
PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
iRaMs


Joined: 05 May 2010
Posts: 4015
Location: Teletran 1
PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

holt_bruce81 wrote:
What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one?


Then grab Markus Wheaton and Tony Jefferson on defense.
_________________
Jared Cook: MIA

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DEE RAWL


Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 4515
Location: Southern California
PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

holt_bruce81 wrote:
What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one?


IMO if it was me I would choose Lewan over Matthews. But i love Warmack big time. I think if Allen is available when either one of the picks are up then they gotta pull the trigger. I really dont think they will decide to snag 2 OL in round 1. I think it would be stupid not to take Warmack considering the glaring need at LG and an elite prospect at that position coming out and projected to be there right where the picks are supposed to be.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
iRaMs


Joined: 05 May 2010
Posts: 4015
Location: Teletran 1
PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

holt_bruce81 wrote:
What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one?


Then grab Markus Wheaton and Tony Jefferson on defense.
_________________
Jared Cook: MIA

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jrry32


Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 46504
PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

holt_bruce81 wrote:
What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one?


Not sure. Depends on what we do with WR in FA.
_________________
The LBC wrote:
Harper41 wrote:
Don't worry. Sean Payton would pass the ball in a Tornado.

But would he do it in a Sharknado?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kgarrett12486


Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 9656
Location: Busch III
PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

holt_bruce81 wrote:
What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one?


Best OT and OG in the darft, I wouldn't mind one bit...
_________________

IDOG_det on the sig...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DEE RAWL


Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 4515
Location: Southern California
PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kgarrett12486 wrote:
holt_bruce81 wrote:
What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one?


Best OT and OG in the darft, I wouldn't mind one bit...


Best OT?... Debatable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
kgarrett12486


Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 9656
Location: Busch III
PostPosted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DEE RAWL wrote:
kgarrett12486 wrote:
holt_bruce81 wrote:
What would you guys think if we went Jake Matthews and Chance Warmack in round one?


Best OT and OG in the darft, I wouldn't mind one bit...


Best OT?... Debatable.


Not to me...

Wink
_________________

IDOG_det on the sig...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> St. Louis Rams All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15 ... 134, 135, 136  Next
Page 14 of 136

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group