| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
spilltray
Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 8645
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:06 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Not saying it is or isn't the matchups I'd pick, but imagine how great it would be to go through Seattle, NY, and Atlanta on the way to the SB. Probably the 3 NFC teams I'd most like to see the Packers smack down this year.
_________________
| Wilfred wrote: | | Memory is like the Packers when they are behind by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter... It comes back. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
palmy50
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 12503
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
The only possible matchup on paper I would not feel good about in the playoffs is the 49ers.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spilltray
Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 8645
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| palmy50 wrote: | | The only possible matchup on paper I would not feel good about in the playoffs is the 49ers. |
Strangely enough I'm more scared of the 49ers if Alex Smith is starting than Kapernick. I get what he brings to the table in that extra dimension, but I believe he's more likely to give the Packers something they can hopefully capitalize on. I agree it's probably the most scary match up, but if it comes down to a slugfest and who makes the fewest mistakes... well, we pays our moneys and we takes ours chances, right?
_________________
| Wilfred wrote: | | Memory is like the Packers when they are behind by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter... It comes back. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
persiandud
Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 553
Location: Davis, CA
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 6:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| palmy50 wrote: | | The only possible matchup on paper I would not feel good about in the playoffs is the 49ers. |
Agreed, I don't want to face the Niners. I feel like they would dominate the trenches on both sides and control the flow of the game.
I don't want to face the Giants either, as they seem to just have our number recently, but I think we match up better against them. Plus, the added revenge incentive would be sweet.
I really want to face the Falcons. Ideal playoff scenario: 3rd seed, play Seachickens, exact revenge for Inaccurate Reception, play 2nd seeded Niners, Woodson picks off Kaepernick 8 times, then NFC championship in Atlanta, and Rodgers puts on his favorite shoes and dominates.
Super Bowl: Patriots 42 Packers 420 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justo
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9041
Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quote: | y New England Patriots 10-3 (3-0) (13-3)
New York Jets 6-7 (2-1) (8-8)
Miami Dolphins 5-8 (2-1) (7-9)
Buffalo Bills 5-8 (0-3) (5-11)
Baltimore Ravens 9-4 (1-2) (10-6)
Cincinnati Bengals 7-6 (2-1) (9-7)
Pittsburgh Steelers 7-6 (1-2) (8-8)
Cleveland Browns 5-8 (0-3) (5-11)
x Houston Texans 11-2 (3-0) (14-2)
Indianapolis Colts 9-4 (1-2) (10-6)
Tennessee Titans 4-9 (1-2) (5-11)
Jacksonville Jaguars 2-11 (0-3)
y Denver Broncos 10-3 (3-0) (13-3)
San Diego Chargers 5-8 (2-1) (7-9)
Oakland Raiders 3-10 (1-2) (4-12)
Kansas City Chiefs 2-11 (0-3) (2-14)
New York Giants 8-5 (3-0) (11-5)
Washington Redskins 7-6 (3-0) (10-6)
Dallas Cowboys 7-6 (2-1) (9-7)
Philadelphia Eagles 4-9 (0-3) (4-12)
Green Bay Packers 9-4 (3-0) (12-4)
Chicago Bears 8-5 (2-1) (10-6)
Minnesota Vikings 7-6 (0-3) (7-9)
Detroit Lions 4-9 (1-2) (5-11)
y Atlanta Falcons 11-2 (1-2) (12-4)
Tampa Bay Buccaneers 6-7 (3-0) (9-7)
Carolina Panthers 4-9 (3-0) (7-9)
New Orleans Saints 5-8 (0-3) (5-11)
San Francisco 49ers 9-3-1 (2-1) (11-4-1)
Seattle Seahawks 8-5 (2-1) (10-6)
St. Louis Rams 6-6-1 (1-2) (7-8-1)
Arizona Cardinals 4-9 (0-3) (4-12)
AFC
1 Houston Texans
2 New England Patriots
3 Denver Broncos
4 Baltimore Ravens
5 Indianapolis Colts
6 Cincinnati Bengals
Bengals Broncos
Colts Ravens
Ravens Texans
Broncos Patriots
Patriots Texans
NFC
1 Green Bay Packers
2 Atlanta Falcons
3 San Francisco 49ers
4 New York Giants
5 Washington Redskins
6 Seattle Seahawks
Seahawks 49ers
Redskins Giants
Giants Packers
49ers Falcons
Giants 49ers
Superb Owl
Giants Patriots
Notes: Jets lose Chargers game. Only really losable game on their schedule TBH. Pretty close though. If they win that then they are in the playoffs. Chicago loses a tie breaker with Seattle and Washington in this situation after losing one game :shock: Packers game is going to mean a lot for them. Also Falcons losing the #1 seed is sort of big. |
We could get this #1 seed....Atlanta could lose any division game really TBH...only have to have one loss from SF which has Seattle and New England on their plate...
_________________
 | HyponGrey wrote: | | Facing the reality that your team has higher standards than you do? Priceless. |
@JustoFS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pollino14
Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 15139
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| palmy50 wrote: | | The only possible matchup on paper I would not feel good about in the playoffs is the 49ers. |
The G-men is a nightmare of a match up for us too.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 5512
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| pollino14 wrote: | | palmy50 wrote: | | The only possible matchup on paper I would not feel good about in the playoffs is the 49ers. |
The G-men is a nightmare of a match up for us too. |
I don't like facing that D-line but if we can run the ball on them some it will help our guys out. You really can't run the ball on the 49ers and then when it is 3rd down, Aldon Smith can just pin his ears back, thats what is dangerous about that team. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 5512
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I have come to grips with the fact that NOBODY is going to like this team in the playoffs outside of our fanbase. Everybody will be able to pull up some dumb stat about how we aren't that good. Like -AP ran fer 210, they run defense sux- or just -Their defense sucks- in general because of last year. Or we can't run the ball because we haven't had a 100 yard rusher in blah blah blah. I am still worried about our pass protection and everybody getting on the same page, but people act like we lucked into our record, hopefully we stun some people and go on another Super Bowl run. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pack4life7
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 2865
Location: Illinois
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
After looking at the schedules here is how i see it shaking out for the NFC
1. Falcons 13-3
2. Packers 12-4
3. 49ers 11-4-1
4. Giants 10-6
5. Seahawks 10-6
6. Bears 9-7
WC
Bears @ 49ers
Seahawks @ Giants
Divsional Round
Giants @ Packers
Bears @ Atlanta Hardest pick for me. Toss up. I guess Atlanta.
NFCCG
Packers @ Falcons
I think us and New York do this dance in Lambeau one more time.
_________________
Ted brought us Clay
Same Old Jay |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
incognito_man
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 26369
Location: Madison
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
If I had to guess, I say we get the bye and host SF.
UNLESS Seattle beats SF in week 17. Looking like a SF/GB rematch though... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
svp
Joined: 11 Sep 2011
Posts: 602
Location: I took a football shaped pill and felt better.
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
all those opponents are good adversaries.
It's what makes the playoffs so good.
It would be nice to show Giants, Seahawks and 9ers the door.
A win over the Bears seems so old and played out.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CWood21
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 30531
Location: 'Merica
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quote: | Green Bay can clinch the NFC North division with:
1) GB win
Green Bay can clinch a playoff berth with:
1) GB tie + DAL loss + WAS loss + STL-MIN tie OR
2) GB tie + DAL loss + WAS loss + MIN loss + SF win or tie OR
3) GB tie + DAL loss + WAS loss + MIN loss + SEA does not tie |
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/eye-on-football/21354654/nfl-playoff-picture-scenarios----week-15
_________________
^sandwhich on the sig^
| iPwn wrote: | | If I was going to blow $2,600 on a night of fun, the last thing I would be thinking to do was play skee ball. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Unballed Melon
Joined: 09 Dec 2011
Posts: 31
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I bet they don't list that one very often. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GBPACKMAN4LIFE
Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Posts: 16362
Location: Spokane, WA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
incognito_man
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 26369
Location: Madison
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Just posted this in GEN, but here's my thoughts RIGHT NOW
NYG lose only to BAL
ATL beats DET and TB
49ers drop 2 to NE and SEA
SEA wins out
WAS wins out
1] ATL
2] GB
3] SEA
4] NYG
5] SF
6] WAS
SEA over WAS
NYG over SF
GB over SEA
NYG over ATL
GB over NYG |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
