| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mattlock76
Joined: 06 Sep 2009
Posts: 2001
Location: Madison, WI. Heart of the Beer Belt.
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:53 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| WIsportsfan wrote: | | Starks looked great, Green had a few good runs and was utilized perfectly in the screen game and when Cobb came out of the backfield he looked very good too. Running game by committee. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenjon_Barner
or
http://www.und.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/riddick_theo00.html
_________________
"How must I prepare myself? Should I jump off the tallest building in the world? Should I lie in the lawn and let it run over me with lawnmowers? Should I go to Africa and let it trample me with raging elephants?"-The Ultimate Warrior |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skibrett15
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1042
Location: nibelheim
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
pass pro was actually great on some plays even with Lang at RT.
Couple of times rodg went through 3+ reads and then scrambled or got rid of the ball. Good to see.
Mike daniels, mike neal and Raji make a nice combo on pass situations.
Thought brad jones held up ok considering the speed of the howlin' wolf man was always threatening the edge.
good blocking on some of the cobb returns. ST play has been a huge + as the off/def can be a little inconsistent.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Title Town USA
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 15400
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| justo wrote: | 
|
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PossibleCabbage
Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 2450
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Saw on Twitter that the Packers are now 15-0 when Starks gets 10 or more carries.
Clearly we need to dust off the Randy Ratio. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mxr124
Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 424
Location: Dubuque, Ia.
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good stuff! ^^^
What is MM's record after bye weeks? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BobSacamano
Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 12732
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Two teams in the league are 7-1.. Who beat them both?
_________________
| KingTarvaris7 wrote: | | last year's vikings were far better than the packers team that just won |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eternal
Joined: 30 Nov 2007
Posts: 295
Location: Illinois
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BobSacamano wrote: | | Two teams in the league are 7-1.. Who beat them both? |
Themselves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tabbaker
Joined: 07 Oct 2012
Posts: 180
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Missed most of the game. What was Rodgers interception due to? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
khodder
Joined: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 48165
Location: New New York
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
OPI??
But yeah, you guys deserved the win. Defense blew a couple of plays, could not get pressure and missed far too many tackles. We got nothing going on the ground, and we lucky to get away with a few holds along the OL in the passing game.
Seems like the dropsies entered the stadium for this game the teams combined for 10-12 of them today.
_________________
Patrick Peterson - 92 targets, 40 catches allowed, 602 yards, 6 TD's, 7 INT's
The Big Brain am winning again, I am the Greetest. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CallMeBarrett
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 484
Location: Gainesville, Florida
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
There are 3 Packers over 40 receptions and 450 yards, and none being Greg Jennings.
Randall Cobb is the leading receiver on the team, and second in the NFL in all-purpose yards.
Did anyone foresee this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ramonesfan
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 1389
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Notorious genius and avid gambler Norm Macdonald has stated that the NFC North will be won by the Chicago Bears.
He also said the Philadelphia Eagles will win the East.
_________________
| Title Town USA wrote: | I doubt Ted gets any sleep tonight. He'll still be working the phones. Obviously nobody will be answering.
|
NFC North Champions once again! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PossibleCabbage
Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 2450
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Really, if we argued about every uncalled OPI foul, we'd have no time to talk about anything else regarding football.
It's the only foul in the rulebook that is actually chronically under-officiated, but the NFL won't make it a POI because it would inhibit scoring. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ramonesfan
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 1389
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ramonesfan wrote: | Notorious genius and avid gambler Norm Macdonald has stated that the NFC North will be won by the Chicago Bears.
He also said the Philadelphia Eagles will win the East. |
He also picked Minnesota and Seattle as the wild cards. So he's not a good gambler.
_________________
| Title Town USA wrote: | I doubt Ted gets any sleep tonight. He'll still be working the phones. Obviously nobody will be answering.
|
NFC North Champions once again! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AtariB20
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 3188
Location: The Real Titletown, USA
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| PossibleCabbage wrote: |
Really, if we argued about every uncalled OPI foul, we'd have no time to talk about anything else regarding football.
It's the only foul in the rulebook that is actually chronically under-officiated, but the NFL won't make it a POI because it would inhibit scoring. |
The guy isn't using it as an excuse... It was an OPI. Just like when Nick Perry had a sack that caused a fumble recovery Vs. the Colts and they called a penalty on it. We lost because of it, and we ate that **** up. Not like he's in here saying "OMG the refs are why we lost, this was an OPI and if not for that TD, we would have won"
Give him some slack, he's a Cards fan (Just messing khodder  ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PossibleCabbage
Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 2450
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| AtariB20 wrote: | | PossibleCabbage wrote: |
Really, if we argued about every uncalled OPI foul, we'd have no time to talk about anything else regarding football.
It's the only foul in the rulebook that is actually chronically under-officiated, but the NFL won't make it a POI because it would inhibit scoring. |
The guy isn't using it as an excuse... It was an OPI. Just like when Nick Perry had a sack that caused a fumble recovery Vs. the Colts and they called a penalty on it. We lost because of it, and we ate that **** up. Not like he's in here saying "OMG the refs are why we lost, this was an OPI and if not for that TD, we would have won"
Give him some slack, he's a Cards fan (Just messing khodder :wink: ) |
Well, you can never say you lost because a penalty on the offense went uncalled. Were OPI called (as it should have been) on that play, it's not like it wouldn't still be third and goal, and we can't say for certain whether or not they would have scored a touchdown on third and goal from 10 yards back (or maybe there would have been an automatic first down penalty on the defense, leading to a new set of downs and a touchdown.) You can never say that had that drive not resulted in a touchdown that either side wouldn't have adjusted their playcalling later in the game, etc.
But that was OPI, and every single game I've seen this season has had multiple uncalled instances of offensive pass interference on both teams. It's chronically under-officiated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
