| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
alfalcone 
Joined: 25 Apr 2009 Posts: 970 Location: Brother Jimmy's
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SnA ExclusiVe 
Joined: 01 Jun 2011 Posts: 10629 Location: Spokane, WA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Anything less than a 1st rounder and Daryl Washington we should say no to
Let's play the "who's more desperate" game! _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bmore4life815 
Joined: 22 Nov 2010 Posts: 3427 Location: Climbing up M&T
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SnA ExclusiVe wrote: | Anything less than a 1st rounder and Daryl Washington we should say no to
Let's play the "who's more desperate" game! |
You tell 'em! D-Wash or it's a wash! _________________
Bernard "Crush Boy" Pollard- Forever a Raven
El Ramster on the sig that isn't going anywhere |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coordinator0
Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 5873
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Meh, Bradley wouldn't be much of an upgrade over McClain or Ellerbe. Just more average/below-average thrown into the mix. I doubt the Ravens trade McKinnie because there isn't anybody else to play LT if Oher goes down. Harewood could get thrown there but I really don't think that would end well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bmore4life815 
Joined: 22 Nov 2010 Posts: 3427 Location: Climbing up M&T
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| coordinator0 wrote: | | Meh, Bradley wouldn't be much of an upgrade over McClain or Ellerbe. Just more average/below-average thrown into the mix. I doubt the Ravens trade McKinnie because there isn't anybody else to play LT if Oher goes down. Harewood could get thrown there but I really don't think that would end well. |
Did Ramon Harewood play LT at Morehouse? _________________
Bernard "Crush Boy" Pollard- Forever a Raven
El Ramster on the sig that isn't going anywhere |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coordinator0
Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 5873
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Yep. I wouldn't want him there in the NFL though. In my opinion he probably wouldn't be any worse than McKinnie but I doubt the team thinks the same way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnnyV 
Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 2205 Location: Chicago, Illinois
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mancunian Raven
Joined: 09 Oct 2012 Posts: 512
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I can't imagine the Cardinals would offer any decent players in a trade for McKinnie. Just get a 4th round pick, maybe something in the 2014 draft as well.
That would give the Ravens a bit more to play with if they wanted to trade up in the draft.
Harewood or Osemele could fill in at LT for Oher, in an emergency. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnnyV 
Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 2205 Location: Chicago, Illinois
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Mancunian Raven wrote: | I can't imagine the Cardinals would offer any decent players in a trade for McKinnie. Just get a 4th round pick, maybe something in the 2014 draft as well.
That would give the Ravens a bit more to play with if they wanted to trade up in the draft.
Harewood or Osemele could fill in at LT for Oher, in an emergency. |
I'd imagine if it wasn't somone like Bradley, who would make a lot of sense because of his familiarity with Harbaugh in Philly, then it will be a future pick.
We don't really have a surplus of depth on defense. Our starters might be good, but we're pretty thin after that especially in our front seven.
I know he's 33, but isn't he locked in after this year as well? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SnA ExclusiVe 
Joined: 01 Jun 2011 Posts: 10629 Location: Spokane, WA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I wouldn't even trade Bradley for McKinnie unless it came with a 4th rounder or something like that. Bradley is washed up and we don't need that mess around here, especially with how our D is right now. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bmore4life815 
Joined: 22 Nov 2010 Posts: 3427 Location: Climbing up M&T
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SnA ExclusiVe wrote: | | I wouldn't even trade Bradley for McKinnie unless it came with a 4th rounder or something like that. Bradley is washed up and we don't need that mess around here, especially with how our D is right now. |
Did you get rid of the Skittles avi because the 'Niners fans on here have been giving you so much flak for it? _________________
Bernard "Crush Boy" Pollard- Forever a Raven
El Ramster on the sig that isn't going anywhere |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SnA ExclusiVe 
Joined: 01 Jun 2011 Posts: 10629 Location: Spokane, WA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bmore4life815 wrote: | | SnA ExclusiVe wrote: | | I wouldn't even trade Bradley for McKinnie unless it came with a 4th rounder or something like that. Bradley is washed up and we don't need that mess around here, especially with how our D is right now. |
Did you get rid of the Skittles avi because the 'Niners fans on here have been giving you so much flak for it? |
Yes, and moreso to prevent future confusion as to who my #1 team is, since apparently EVERYONE has to bring it up inside GDT's every...freaking...week. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diamondbull424 
 Joined: 02 Dec 2007 Posts: 10018 Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SnA ExclusiVe wrote: | | bmore4life815 wrote: | | SnA ExclusiVe wrote: | | I wouldn't even trade Bradley for McKinnie unless it came with a 4th rounder or something like that. Bradley is washed up and we don't need that mess around here, especially with how our D is right now. |
Did you get rid of the Skittles avi because the 'Niners fans on here have been giving you so much flak for it? |
Yes, and moreso to prevent future confusion as to who my #1 team is, since apparently EVERYONE has to bring it up inside GDT's every...freaking...week. |
Speaking of your new Avi... I love it and it looks awesome, but it also looks a little too big, if you could shrank it down to 80x80 that'd be great. _________________
Blind arrogance sows the field of it's own destruction. - Commander Greil, Fire Emblem |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diamondbull424 
 Joined: 02 Dec 2007 Posts: 10018 Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:58 am Post subject: Re: Apparantly the Cardinals might be interested in Bryant |
|
|
|
Well today is the deadline but I honestly wouldn't want to trade McKinnie. Depth is key. We've been hit with a string of injuries and you never know when a guy might go down. A 4th round pick is great and everything... and you all know how much I love picks, but that being said, we should have enough compensatory picks to provide us a nice haul of picks either way.
McKinnie's value as a competent backup on a veteran team looking to win a Championship is simply too great.
That said, I wouldn't be too against the trade if it happened. If Oher went down at LT, I'd think it's possible we might move Jah Reid over to LT... or Marshal Yanda to LT and Reid into RG. I don't think we'd go with Ramon Harewood as the LT in such a scenario... he probably barely practiced there (to be considered over more talented players) anyway with him being on injured reserve for the past two seasons and being switched to LG this season. _________________
Blind arrogance sows the field of it's own destruction. - Commander Greil, Fire Emblem |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SnA ExclusiVe 
Joined: 01 Jun 2011 Posts: 10629 Location: Spokane, WA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| diamondbull424 wrote: | | SnA ExclusiVe wrote: | | bmore4life815 wrote: | | SnA ExclusiVe wrote: | | I wouldn't even trade Bradley for McKinnie unless it came with a 4th rounder or something like that. Bradley is washed up and we don't need that mess around here, especially with how our D is right now. |
Did you get rid of the Skittles avi because the 'Niners fans on here have been giving you so much flak for it? |
Yes, and moreso to prevent future confusion as to who my #1 team is, since apparently EVERYONE has to bring it up inside GDT's every...freaking...week. |
Speaking of your new Avi... I love it and it looks awesome, but it also looks a little too big, if you could shrank it down to 80x80 that'd be great. |
Ahhh, you're gonna be that guy, huh? I would love to shrink it, but unfortunately I don't have the editing skills to do so, so if someone wants to do that and PM me, feel free.
I've seen people who have slightly larger than 80x80 avi's so I figured this one was fine since it's not "eye popping" big. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|