| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
shadow walker
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 11848
Location: Groton CT
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:37 pm Post subject: u know- |
 |
|
|
u know u guys are gonna be in cap hell....u guys should have gone after moose....
curry is really coming around...jerry porter is beginning to establish himself to the rest of the country and u wouldnt have to trade a top ten pick for a WR...u could have signed one from FA!
_________________
one of the great ones on this site |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wjb5020
Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I disagree. We gave up a 7th overall pick, and an underachieving linebacker for the best receiver in the league. That's a steal in anyone's book. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shadow walker
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 11848
Location: Groton CT
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
the best headache in the league...u guys are gonne be in cap hell though..u guys should have stayed where yall were at...
_________________
one of the great ones on this site |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hartgobluehenne
Joined: 30 Nov 2004
Posts: 67
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| With the restructuring of contracts and releases the Raiders are already able to fit under the cap with Lamont Jordan (signing tomarrow) and Moss. And once we find a sucker to take Woodson's B**** A*** 10.5 there will be a few more moves. It may seem like stupid moves but I'll take quality players any day when you're scraping the bottom of the barrel two years in a row following a Super Bowl |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RabidRaider
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Posts: 27
Location: NJ
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| looks like Moss restructured also...he's at 2.75 million for 2005... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SuppaMan
Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 999
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nobody wants Woodson. Sportsline even quoted a PD as saying that if the Raiders don't want him that tells everybody something. It was along those lines, his points were if the Raiders are trying to get rid of him no one is going to touch him, especially with his history of problems and wanting big money. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MNBuff
Joined: 08 Feb 2005
Posts: 370
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SuppaMan wrote: | | Nobody wants Woodson. Sportsline even quoted a PD as saying that if the Raiders don't want him that tells everybody something. It was along those lines, his points were if the Raiders are trying to get rid of him no one is going to touch him, especially with his history of problems and wanting big money. |
I don't buy that one. If NO ONE wanted C-Wood, why would they have to franchise him??? I'm not saying he's not a pain in the A$$, because we all know he is. But he is a good coverman, and he would get snatched up quickly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
